bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.10.09.757080

Active teaching-learning methodology in a non-formal teaching environment as a tool to mitigate the "plant awareness disparity" in public school students.

Abstract

Currently, a significant proportion of young people are discouraged by the teaching of botany and, consequently, show little interest in preserving local biodiversity. On the other hand, with the recurrent use of digital technologies (DTs), young people have shown significant interest in virtual devices. Our project's tested the hypothesis whether plants awareness disparity in public school students was overcome through active teaching and learning. Thus, the objective was to investigate the use of active methodology in a non-formal teaching environment (e.g., sensory garden, SG) in order to stimulate learning in plant organography based on its evaluation using digital games. Our proposal was investigated at the Lagoa do Sino campus (Buri/SP, Brazil) in partnership with the Public School System of the Municipality of Campina do Monte Alegre/SP, Brazil. Furthermore, students were divided into two teams, which applied qualitative methodologies, such as that one of these (Team A) had face-to-face contact with the SG, using the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) methodology, digital game and survey. Team B, on the other hand, will only have contact with the game. After collecting the data, we verified statistically significant differences between the teams using the Wilcoxon test and based on the latent traits evaluated. Given this, the literature points out that discouraging students influences their learning and, consequently, their education. In addition, our considerations are based on the latent trait knowledge of botany and, thus, we reject our null hypothesis and accept our alternative hypothesis. On the other hand, based on the latent trait of plant perception, we cannot affirm the acceptance or rejection of the hypotheses. It is worth noting that future studies should have a larger number of participants than this research in order to better evaluate what is intended.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Almeida-Miron-Soldi, D., Mesquita-de-Oliveira, I., Pimentel, F. S. C., Baron, D.. 2026-10-12. Active teaching-learning methodology in a non-formal teaching environment as a tool to mitigate the "plant awareness disparity" in public school students.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.09.757080

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

The Impact of Small-group Education on Student Wellbeing in Undergraduate Biology: a Student Perspective on Self-Determination Theory

Alarming reports about mental health have raised awareness of student wellbeing in STEM Education. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) implies that wellbeing can be improved by fulfilling the needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. Educational design elements such as small-group teaching, peer feedback and offering a low-stakes practice environment can help fulfill these SDT needs. These elements were applied in a new academic skills course in our undergraduate Biology program. Here, we investigated how this affected the students sense of autonomy, competence and relatedness, and whether this was related to wellbeing. First, a survey among 48 students confirmed that student wellbeing is positively correlated to SDT fulfillment. Next, group interviews with students revealed that wellbeing is mostly dependent on relatedness, which is facilitated through small-group teaching in the first semester. Furthermore, students reported that (1) relatedness evolves through bonding with peers over the shared experience of struggle, (2) competence requires (peer) feedback and opportunities for growth, especially in laboratory coursework and (3) a structured, low-stakes environment supports competence, but without optimal challenge, also undermines a sense of autonomy. This illustrates how students perceive the effects of small-group educational activities on their wellbeing through the lens of Self-Determination Theory.

scientific communication and education↗

It runs in the family: New extinct species from charismatic clades are more likely to be published in high-impact journals than those from non-charismatic clades

The cultural landscape of paleontology is dominated by dinosaurs and a few other charismatic clades that are more likely to be depicted in media and to be recognized by the public. There is a prevailing belief among researchers that these biases extend to scholarly publishing - that certain clades enjoy a 'taxonomic advantage' that renders them more likely to be published in high-impact journals like Nature and Science. Given the importance of publishing in high-impact journals for career advancement, quantitative testing of this hypothesis can inform on potential biases in this area. I examined articles describing new species that were published between 2000 and mid-2026 in one of thirteen journals (n = 4,248 articles, 8,331 new species), ranging from high-profile, multidisciplinary titles like Nature to lower-profile, specialist titles like the Journal of Paleontology. Comparisons of the taxonomic composition of new species between journals revealed a positive correlation between a journal's prestige (approximated by its impact factor) and the relative proportion of new species that belong to charismatic clades. Avemetatarsalians and mammaliamorphs represent more than 50% of new species in Nature and Science but less than 15% of new species in the control group of paleontological journals. These results provide support for the perception that there is a bias between extinct taxa as it relates to publication in high-impact journals. Given the potential for researchers to accrue cumulative advantage through publishing in prestigious journals, bias in favor of charismatic clades creates the potential for opportunities and knowledge generation to become increasingly skewed and consolidated towards these clades, at the expense of less charismatic clades and the people studying them. This threatens the discipline's ability to continue to construct a holistic understanding of the full history of life that can be disseminated to the public. Further attention should be directed towards examining potential biases in paleontological publications as the primary currency in academia.

scientific communication and education↗

NIH's dedicated K23 trial pathway was associated with more K-trial leadership but no detectable gain in new trials

Research funders often train investigators by funding a project, expecting the experience to produce leaders of the next one. Delivering the funded project and leading new work are different outcomes. In 2018 the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) created a dedicated clinical trial pathway for its K23 mentored career development awards. Using registry records for 1,847 K23 awardees and a language-model measurement corrected against blinded human review, we compared awardees whose awarded plans proposed their own trial with those whose plans did not, before and after the change. The pathway was followed by more leadership of the award-supported trial (difference in differences, 13.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 5.7 to 21.2) but no detectable gain in leadership of distinct new trials (-3.8; -14.4 to 6.9), including over seven years. The K-trial estimate exceeded the new-trial estimate by 17.4 points (5.3 to 29.7) under every measurement correction. The additional supported trials were registered with the awardee as principal investigator and started at rates similar to earlier ones, whereas whether more awardees led any trial depended on the correction. Because groups were defined by awarded plans, the design cannot fully separate changes in behaviour from changes in who was funded. A training pathway can raise delivery of the work it funds without a detectable increase in leadership of further trials. As NIH consolidates its career awards and ends K support for trial conduct, evaluations should measure both outcomes.

scientific communication and education↗