bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Maeda, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Maeda, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Local membrane charge regulates β2 adrenergic receptor coupling to Gi

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane receptors that signal through heterotrimeric G proteins. Lipid modifications anchor G proteins to the plasma membrane; however, little is known about the effect of phospholipid composition on GPCR-G protein coupling. The {beta}2 adrenergic receptor ({beta}2AR) signals through both Gs and Gi in cardiac myocytes where studies suggest that Gi signaling may be cardioprotective. However, Gi coupling is much less efficient than Gs coupling in most cell-based and biochemical assays, making it difficult to study {beta}2AR-Gi interactions. To investigate the role of phospholipid composition on Gs and Gi coupling, we reconstituted {beta}2AR in detergent/lipid mixed micelles and found that negatively charged phospholipids (PS and PG) inhibit {beta}2AR-Gi3 coupling. Replacing negatively charged lipids with neutral lipids (PC or PE) facilitated the formation of a functional {beta}2AR-Gi3 interaction that activated Gi3. Ca2+, known to interact with negatively charged PS, facilitated {beta}2AR-Gi3 interaction in PS. Mutational analysis suggested that Ca2+ interacts with the negatively charged EDGE motif on the carboxyl-terminal end of the N helix of Gi3 and coordinates an EDGE-PS interaction. These results were confirmed in {beta}2AR reconstituted into nanodisc phospholipid bilayers. {beta}2AR-Gi3 interaction was favored in neutral lipids (PE and PC) over negatively charged lipids (PG and PS). In contrast, basal {beta}2AR-Gs interaction was favored in negatively charged lipids over neutral lipids. In negatively-charged lipids, Ca2+ and Mg2+ facilitated {beta}2AR-Gi3 interaction. Taken together, our observations suggest that local membrane charge modulates the interaction between {beta}2AR and competing G protein subtypes.

biochemistry

Development of honeybee waggle dance and its differences between recruits and scouts

The lifetime development of the waggle dance of 14 honeybees was automatically recorded just after the imaginal molt using high-definition camera modules connected with a Raspberry Pi computer and numbered radio-frequency identification tags fitted to the back of each bee. For most honeybees, waggle dance follow preceded the appearance of the first waggle dance from 1 week after the imaginal molt. The duration per trip increased just after waggle dance follow. Before the appearance of the first waggle dance, the honeybee repeatedly follows waggle dances that indicate a limited number (2-6) of food source locations. We discriminated between two types of foragers with different roles, recruits and novice scouts, by comparing the vectors indicated by the bees first waggle dance (sending vectors) with dances they had previously followed (received vectors). Of 14 tagged honeybees, 11 were categorized as recruits and 2 as novice scouts. For recruits (but not for novice scouts), the duration per trip increased significantly after waggle dances follow and substantially increased just before the appearance of the first waggle dance. Moreover, recruits increased the number of times they followed waggle dances indicating the same location, and their first waggle dance indicated this location. These results suggest that the differentiation of these two types of foragers is partly related to behavioral differences after waggle dance follows: whether trip is activated or not by follows a waggle dance.\n\nSummary statementBecause of technological difficulties, there are no studies comparing the development of recruit and scout waggle dances. Using miniature radio frequency identification tags, we observed and clarified these developmental processes.\n\nList of Abbreviations

animal behavior and cognition