Biology subjects

Eilertsen, E. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Eilertsen, E. M..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

LT-FGRS: a unifying R-package for the estimation of family-based genetic liabilities at population-scale

Estimates of per-individual genetic liability from large-scale family data are routinely used in biomedical research to describe genetic etiology of traits and disorders, boost the power of gene-mapping studies, and improve risk predictions. Here we present LT-FGRS, an R package for handling population-scale pedigrees and implementing multiple state-of-the-field methods for estimating genetic liability from such data. Benchmarking in population-scale Nordic registry data demonstrates that LT-FGRS reproduces estimates from existing implementations at manageable computational cost. LT-FGRS unifies previous parallel implementations into a single framework, lowering barriers for methodological comparison and applied use. Availability and ImplementationLT-FGRS is available as an R-package on CRAN. (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=LTFGRS) Contactemp@au.dk; morten.dybdahl.krebs@regionh.dk Supplementary informationhttps://emilmip.github.io/LTFGRS

genetics↗

bioRxiv2025

Parental Influence on Children's Educational Achievements: Analysing Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects through Trio-GCTA

Educational achievement is a key predictor of later-life outcomes, including financial security, social mobility, health, and mortality. Knowing its familial determinants, such as genetic predispositions, is crucial for understanding intergenerational educational mobility and addressing educational inequality. Here, we disentangle direct and indirect genetic effects on educational achievement using trio genome-wide complex trait analysis (Trio-GCTA). Leveraging up to 23,200 genotyped parent-offspring trios from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), we find that direct genetic effects explain 15-21% of the variance in educational achievements, including 8th-grade national assessments in Math, Reading, and English, and 10th-grade grade point average (GPA). Notably, indirect genetic effects additionally explain 7-15% of the variance. Both mothers and fathers exert notable influences, exceeding those suggested in previous studies. Moreover, positive gene-environment correlations between parents and offspring show that the intrafamilial environment and childrens genetic predisposition are dependent and mutually reinforcing.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2024

Understanding indirect assortative mating and its intergenerational consequences

We develop a framework for understanding indirect assortative mating and provide updated definitions of key terms. We then develop family models that use partners of twins and siblings to freely estimate the degree of genetic and social homogamy, and account for it when investigating sources of parent-offspring similarity. We applied the models to educational attainment using 1,545,444 individuals in 212,070 extended families in the Norwegian population and Norwegian Twin Registry. Partner similarity in education was better explained by indirect assortment than direct assortment on observed educational attainment, with social homogamy being particularly important. The implied genotypic partner correlation (r=.34) was comparable to earlier studies, and higher than expected under direct assortment. About 38% of the parent-offspring correlation (r=.34) was attributable to various forms of environmental transmission. Alternative models that assumed direct assortment estimated environmental transmission to be lower, but these did not fit the data well.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2023

Genetic and brain similarity independently predict childhood anthropometrics and socioeconomic markers

Linking the developing brain with individual differences in clinical and demographic traits is challenging due to the substantial interindividual heterogeneity of brain anatomy and organization. Here we employ a novel approach that parses individual differences in both cortical thickness and common genetic variants, and assess their effects on a wide set of childhood traits. The approach uses a linear mixed model framework to obtain the unique effects of each type of similarity, as well as their covariance, with the assumption that similarity in cortical thickness may in part be driven by similarity in genetic variants. We employ this approach in a sample of 7760 unrelated children in the ABCD cohort baseline sample (mean age 9.9, 46.8% female). In general, significant associations between cortical thickness similarity and traits were limited to anthropometrics such as height (r2 = 0.11, SE = 0.01), weight (r2 = 0.12, SE = 0.01), and birth weight (r2 = 0.19, SE = 0.01), as well as markers of socioeconomic status such as local area deprivation (r2 = 0.06, SE = 0.01). Analyses of the contribution from common genetic variants to traits revealed contributions across included outcomes, albeit somewhat lower than previous reports, possibly due to the young age of the sample. No significant covariance of the effects of genetic and cortical thickness similarity was found. The present findings highlight the connection between anthropometrics as well as socioeconomic factors and the developing brain, which appear to be independent from individual differences in common genetic variants in this population-based sample. The approach provides a promising framework for analyses of neuroimaging genetics cohorts, which can be further expanded by including imaging derived phenotypes beyond cortical thickness.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Genetic similarity between relatives provides evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating

Assortative mating - the non-random mating of individuals with similar traits - is known to increase trait-specific genetic variance and genetic similarity between relatives. However, empirical evidence is limited for many traits, and the implications hinge on whether assortative mating has started recently or many generations ago. Here we show theoretically and empirically that genetic similarity between relatives can provide evidence on the presence and history of assortative mating. First, we employed path analysis to understand how assortative mating affects genetic similarity between family members across generations, finding that similarity between distant relatives is more affected than close relatives. Next, we correlated polygenic indices of 47,135 co-parents from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and found genetic evidence of assortative mating in nine out of sixteen examined traits. The same traits showed elevated similarity between relatives, especially distant relatives. Six of the nine traits, including educational attainment, showed greater genetic variance among offspring, which is inconsistent with stable assortative mating over many generations. These results suggest an ongoing increase in familial similarity for these traits. The implications of this research extend to genetic methodology and the understanding of social and economic disparities.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2020

Direct and indirect effects of maternal, paternal, and offspring genotypes: Trio-GCTA

Indirect genetic effects from relatives may result in misleading quantifications of heritability, but can also be of interest in their own right. In this paper we propose Trio-GCTA, a model for separating direct and indirect genetic effects when genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism data have been collected from parent-offspring trios. The model is applicable to phenotypes obtained from any of the family members. We discuss appropriate parameter interpretations and apply the method to four exemplar phenotypes; offspring birth weight, offspring temperament, maternal relationship satisfaction, and paternal body-mass index, using real data from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa).

genetics↗