bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/577031

Evolution of Phototransduction Genes in Lepidoptera

Abstract

Vision is underpinned by phototransduction, a signaling cascade that converts light energy into an electrical signal. Among insects, phototransduction is best understood in Drosophila melanogaster. A survey of phototransduction genes in four insect genomes found gains and losses between D. melanogaster and other insects; this study did not include lepidopterans. Diurnal butterflies and nocturnal moths occupy different light environments and have distinct eye morphologies, which might impact the expression of their phototransduction genes. Here, we used transcriptomics and phylogenetics to identify phototransduction genes that vary between D. melanogaster and Lepidoptera, and between moths and butterflies. Most phototransduction genes were conserved between D. melanogaster and Lepidoptera, with some exceptions. We found two lepidopteran opsins lacking a D. melanogaster ortholog, and using antibodies found that one, a candidate retinochrome which we name unclassified opsin (UnRh), is expressed in the crystaline cone cells and the pigment cells of the butterfly Heliconius melpomene. We also found differences between Lepidoptera and D. melanogaster phototransduction in diacylglycerol regulation where a lepidopteran paralog, DAG{beta}, may be taking on a role in vision. Lastly, butterflies express similar amounts of trp and trpl channel mRNAs, while moths express approximately 50x less trp. Since TRP/TRPL channels allow Ca2+ and Na+ influx this might explain why moths appear to express less Calx and Nckx30C Na+/Ca2+ channel mRNAs. Our findings suggest that while many single-copy D. melanogaster phototransduction genes are conserved in lepidopterans, phototransduction gene expression differences exist between moths and butterflies that may be linked to their visual light environment.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Macias-Munoz, A., Rangel Olguin, A. G., Briscoe, A. D.. 2019-03-15. Evolution of Phototransduction Genes in Lepidoptera. https://doi.org/10.1101/577031

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

A timeline for evolution of metabolism in early microbes

The metabolism of early microbes shaped our planet's chemistry and enabled more life to evolve. However, it remains uncertain when many forms of metabolism arose and which organisms carried them out. Here we combine machine learning, metabolic networks, and phylogenomics of microbes to date 14 forms of metabolism and 6 other traits. We find that metabolism evolved in three waves, starting >3.4 billion years ago (Ga) with fermentation and sulfur compound respiration. A second wave began ~3.2 Ga with aerobic respiration and growth, while a third began ~1.4 Ga with further specialization. We compared these predictions with independent dates from the geochemical record, and agreement with conservative dates was good (CCC = 0.81 to 0.89). Several forms of metabolism are invisible in the geochemical record, and our approach dates these forms, too. Our results reconcile different lines of evidence for microbial evolution and provide a fuller picture of early Earth.

evolutionary biology↗

Sexual interactions and local selection shape reproductive gene diversity and divergence

Genes involved in genotype x genotype coevolution display unique patterns of nucleotide diversity and population divergence. In Drosophila melanogaster, Sex Peptide is a key sperm competition gene that is an outlier for both pi within populations and Fst between populations. This pattern is not predicted by current theoretical expectations of selective sweeps highlighting the need to develop predictions to identify genes experiencing balancing selection. We compared pi and FST in D. melanogaster populations to identify other genes following a co-evolutionary model that generates divergence and diversity. Multiple male and female genes that interact with Sex Peptide exhibited elevated FST x pi values. Genome-wide analyses also revealed an enrichment of genes critical for neuronal development, pointing to courtship evolution. Specifically, fruitless, its interacting genes, and a female behavior gene were identified as outliers. These parallel findings indicate that both sperm competition and mating behaviors are subject to co-evolutionary selection.

evolutionary biology↗

How Fisherian runaway halts: Genomic architecture determines the long-term evolutionary consequences of sexual selection.

Sexual selection explains the evolution of exaggerated sexual displays, but less obvious is why biased mate preferences--a requirement for sexual selection--evolve. Fisher (1930) proposed that biased mate preferences can spark self-reinforcing evolutionary process (runaway) that drives their own evolution. This occurs because mate choice imposes sexual selection on sexual displays and links them genetically to mate preferences, producing indirect selection on the preferences themselves. While mathematical models have demonstrated the plausibility of the runaway theory, they rely on several idealized assumptions. Consequently, it remains poorly understood how runaway halts once populations deviate from these idealized conditions as a consequence of evolution via runaway, and how the genetic architecture underlying sexual displays influences the resulting evolutionary dynamics. Here, we address these gaps using two complementary approaches. First, we review and synthesize existing theories to classify the mechanisms that halt runaway into four categories, based on which idealized assumptions of Lande's (1981) classic model are violated during evolution via runaway. Second, we conduct individual-based evolutionary simulations varying the genetic architecture of sexual displays from conventional additive to omnigenic inheritance models. Our results show that genetic architecture determines how runaway process halts, thereby governing long-term evolutionary dynamics under sexual selection.

evolutionary biology↗