Biology subjects

Macias-Munoz, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Macias-Munoz, A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Evolution of Phototransduction Genes in Lepidoptera

Vision is underpinned by phototransduction, a signaling cascade that converts light energy into an electrical signal. Among insects, phototransduction is best understood in Drosophila melanogaster. A survey of phototransduction genes in four insect genomes found gains and losses between D. melanogaster and other insects; this study did not include lepidopterans. Diurnal butterflies and nocturnal moths occupy different light environments and have distinct eye morphologies, which might impact the expression of their phototransduction genes. Here, we used transcriptomics and phylogenetics to identify phototransduction genes that vary between D. melanogaster and Lepidoptera, and between moths and butterflies. Most phototransduction genes were conserved between D. melanogaster and Lepidoptera, with some exceptions. We found two lepidopteran opsins lacking a D. melanogaster ortholog, and using antibodies found that one, a candidate retinochrome which we name unclassified opsin (UnRh), is expressed in the crystaline cone cells and the pigment cells of the butterfly Heliconius melpomene. We also found differences between Lepidoptera and D. melanogaster phototransduction in diacylglycerol regulation where a lepidopteran paralog, DAG{beta}, may be taking on a role in vision. Lastly, butterflies express similar amounts of trp and trpl channel mRNAs, while moths express approximately 50x less trp. Since TRP/TRPL channels allow Ca2+ and Na+ influx this might explain why moths appear to express less Calx and Nckx30C Na+/Ca2+ channel mRNAs. Our findings suggest that while many single-copy D. melanogaster phototransduction genes are conserved in lepidopterans, phototransduction gene expression differences exist between moths and butterflies that may be linked to their visual light environment.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Hybrid assembly of the genome of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae identifies the X-chromosome

Entomopathogenic nematodes from the genus Steinernema are lethal insect parasites that quickly kill their insect hosts with the help of their symbiotic bacteria. Steinernema carpocapsae is one of the most studied entomopathogens due to its broad lethality to diverse insect species and its effective commercial use as a biological control agent for insect pests, as well as a genetic model for studying parasitism, pathogenesis, and symbiosis. In this study, we used long-reads from the Pacific Biosciences platform and BioNano Genomics Irys system to assemble the best genome of S. carpocapsae ALL strain to date, comprising 84.5 Mb in 16 scaffolds, with an N50 of 7.36Mb. The largest scaffold, with 20.9Mb, was identified as chromosome X based on sex-specific genome sequencing. The high level of contiguity allowed us to characterize gene density, repeat content, and GC content. RNA-seq data from 17 developmental stages, spanning from embryo to adult, were used to predict 30,957 gene models. Using this new genome, we performed a macrosyntenic analysis to Caenorhabditis elegans and Pristionchus pacificus and found S. carpocapsaes chromosome X to be primarily orthologous to C. elegans and P. pacificus chromosome II and IV. We also investigated the expansion of protein families and gene expression differences between male and female stage nematodes. This new genome and more accurate set of annotations provide a foundation for new comparative genomic and gene expression studies within the Steinernema clade and across the Nematoda phylum.\n\nArticle SummaryThe insect killing worms Steinernema carpocapsae is a model organism for parasitism and symbiosis. The authors have used long reads and optical mapping to generate substantially contiguous assembly and a new set of gene annotations. They have identified the X chromosome as well as expansions in specific family proteases found in the venom of this worm. A macrosyntenic analysis with C. elegans shows a broad conservation of ancestral chromosomes with the exception of chromosome X. This new assembly will be useful to the Steinernema community and the broader nematode genomics community.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

Integrative analysis of Hydra head regeneration reveals activation of distal enhancer-like elements

The cnidarian model organism Hydra has long been studied for its remarkable ability to regenerate its head, which is controlled by a head organizer located near the hypostome. Cnidarians and bilaterians diverged about 600 millions years ago but the gene contents of species of both phyla are surprisingly similar despite divergent morphologies and functions. While little is known about the role of cis-regulatory elements in cnidarians, understanding gene regulatory mechanisms in cnidarians can potentially shed light on metazoan evolution. The canonical Wnt pathway plays a central role in head organizer function during regeneration and during bud formation, which is the asexual mode of reproduction in Hydra. However, it is unclear how shared the developmental programs of head organizer genesis are in budding and regeneration. Time-series analysis of gene expression changes during head regeneration and budding revealed a set of 298 differentially expressed genes during the 48-hour head regeneration and 72-hour budding time-courses. In order to understand the regulatory elements controlling hydra head regeneration, we first identified 27,137 open-chromatin elements that are open in one or more sections of organism. We used histone modification ChIP-seq to identify 9998 candidate proximal promoter and 3018 candidate enhancer-like regions respectively. We show that a subset of these regulatory elements is dynamically remodeled during head regeneration and identify a set of transcription factor motifs that are enriched in the enhancer regions activated during head regeneration. Our results show that Hydra displays complex gene regulatory structures of developmentally dynamic enhancers, which suggests that the evolution of complex developmental enhancers predates the split of cnidarians and bilaterians.

genomics↗