bioRxiv · 10.1101/572974
A response to Zhang et al. (2018), \"Can Mouse-tracking Reveal Attribute Processing Speeds in Dietary Self-control? Commentary on Sullivan et al. (2015) and Lim et al. (2018)\"
Abstract
Introduction Introduction References In Sullivan et al. (2015), mouse-tracking was used in a food choice paradigm to test two related hypotheses: 1) that there are differences in the relative speed with which the decision-making circuitry computes and weights the value of attributes like health and taste; and, 2) that individual differences in these relative speeds are associated with individual differences in the ability to make healthy dietary choices. Consistent with these hypotheses, a regression analysis of the mouse-tracking paths found that health became significantly predictive of the mouses angle of movement ~195 ms later than taste, on average. Moreover, individual dietary self-control varied with estimates of the individual differences in the relative speed with which taste (tTaste) and health (tHealth) entered the decision-making process. Similar results have ...
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Sullivan, N. J., Hutcherson, C., Harris, A. M., Rangel, A.. 2019-03-11. A response to Zhang et al. (2018), \"Can Mouse-tracking Reveal Attribute Processing Speeds in Dietary Self-control? Commentary on Sullivan et al. (2015) and Lim et al. (2018)\". https://doi.org/10.1101/572974
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.