bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/461715

Human papillomavirus 16 E2 regulates keratinocyte gene expression relevant to cancer and the viral life cycle

Abstract

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are causative agents in ano-genital and oropharyngeal cancers. The virus must reprogram host gene expression to promote infection, and E6 and E7 contribute to this via targeting of cellular transcription factors including p53 and pRb, respectively. The HPV16 E2 protein regulates host gene expression in U2OS cells and in this study we extend these observations into TERT immortalized oral keratinocytes (NOKs) that are capable of supporting late stages of the HPV16 life cycle. We observed repression of innate immune genes by E2 that are also repressed by the intact HPV16 genome in NOKs. RNA-seq data identified 167 up and 395 downregulated genes by E2; there was a highly significant overlap of the E2 regulated genes with those regulated by the intact HPV16 genome in the same cell type. siRNA targeting of E2 reversed repression of E2 targeted genes. The ability of E2 to repress innate immune genes was confirmed in an ano-genital immortalized keratinocyte cell line, N/Tert-1. We present analysis of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for HPV16 positive and negative head and neck cancers (HNC) suggesting that E2 plays a role in regulation of the host genome in cancers. Patients with HPV16 positive HNC with a loss of E2 expression exhibit a worse clinical outcome and we discuss how this could, at least partially, be related to the loss of E2 host gene regulation.\n\nImportanceHPV16 positive tumors that retain expression of E2 have a better clinical outcome than those that have lost E2 expression. It has been suggested that this is due to a loss of E2 repression of E6 and E7 expression but this is not supported by data from tumors where there is not more E6 and E7 expression in the absence of E2. Here we report that E2 regulates host gene expression and place this regulation in context of the HPV16 life cycle and HPV16 positive head and neck cancers (the majority of which retain E2 expression). We propose that this E2 function may play an important part in the increased response of HPV16 positive cancers to radiation therapy. Therefore, host gene regulation by E2 may be important for promotion of the HPV16 life cycle, and also for the response of HPV16 positive tumors to radiation therapy.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Evans, M. R., James, C. D., Bristol, M., Nulton, T. J., Wang, X., Kaur, N., White, E. A., Windle, B., Morgan, I. M.. 2018-11-05. Human papillomavirus 16 E2 regulates keratinocyte gene expression relevant to cancer and the viral life cycle. https://doi.org/10.1101/461715

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Genomic features and instability of linezolid resistance in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis ST525

This study investigated the mechanisms of oxazolidinone resistance and genomic background in clinical ST525 Enterococcus faecalis isolates, a poorly characterized lineage reported in Brazilian hospitals as either vancomycin-resistant (VRE) or linezolid- and vancomycin-resistant (LVRE). Five LVREfs from intensive care unit patients (linezolid MICs, 8-32 mg/L; vancomycin MICs, >256 mg/L) carried only G2576T and G2505A (in three of four rrl copies) as known linezolid resistance determinants, despite variable linezolid MICs. During serial in vitro passages without antibiotic pressure, isolates with initial MICs of 8-16 mg/L exhibited progressive MIC reductions accompanied by reversion of mutant to wild-type rrl copies, whereas the isolate with an initial MIC of 32 mg/L maintained high-level resistance without reversion. Additional domain V substitutions emerged during MIC decline, while growth kinetics remained broadly similar. Whole-genome sequencing of a representative isolate (LVREfs L7) revealed a ~2.8-Mb chromosome enriched in mobile genetic elements (~8.6%), lacking a functional CRISPR-Cas system. A plasmid-borne prototype Tn1546 carrying vanA, devoid of internal insertion sequences, was found inserted into a Tn3-family transposase gene, a platform not typically associated with vanA mobilization. Together, these findings indicate that ST525 LVREfs, whose genomic features are consistent with long-term persistence in hospitals, may pose a challenge to routine susceptibility testing. A single mutational mechanism can yield variable linezolid MICs, and the ratio of mutated vs wild-type rrl copies can become heterogeneous in the absence of antibiotic pressure, without correlating directly with these values, contrary to the well-documented copy number-MIC correlation.

molecular biology↗

Global repression of mesenchymal genes in epithelial cells by the histone demethylase LSD1

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an essential process in development, tissue repair, and tumour metastasis, and is triggered by SNAI, ZEB and TWIST transcription factors, that recruit lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) to repress epithelial genes such as E-cadherin. In mesenchymal cells, LSD1 inhibition restores E-cadherin expression and reduces migration and invasion, consistent with LSD1 inhibition reverting EMT, and offering a therapeutic modality for EMT-associated disease. Recent data, however, suggest context-dependent roles for LSD1, as its inhibition in epithelial cells increases mesenchymal marker expression, potentially promoting EMT. To investigate this discrepancy, we mapped genome-wide binding of LSD1 in HCT116 epithelial cells and used rapid degron-mediated ablation of endogenous LSD1 to measure changes in nascent and steady-state transcription and chromatin accessibility. In epithelial cells, LSD1 binds constitutively-accessible, primed mesenchymal promoters. These are rapidly derepressed after LSD1 ablation, with activation of SNAI2 and ZEB1, which repress epithelial hallmarks such as E-cadherin. Re-introduction of LSD1 downregulates SNAI2 and ZEB1 but, surprisingly, further represses E-cadherin, indicating sustained loss of epithelial characteristics. Collectively, our results show that LSD1 maintains epithelial identity by repressing mesenchymal genes, questioning the therapeutic utility of LSD1 inhibition for EMT control.

molecular biology↗

The long noncoding RNA FOSIL shapes the dynamics of FOS induction

Immediate-early genes require rapid, transient, and precisely tuned transcriptional activation in response to extracellular signals, yet how this kinetic precision is achieved remains poorly understood. We characterize FOSIL (LINC01220), an inducible lncRNA locus downstream of FOS. Depleting FOSIL RNA delays heregulin (HRG)-induced FOS mRNA and protein accumulation and prolongs the response, indicating that FOSIL sharpens both the onset and the shutoff of the induction wave. Capture Micro-C maps show that FOSIL depletion weakens the chromatin boundary between FOS and FOSIL and increases local compaction across the pre-assembled FOS-FOSIL neighborhood during serum starvation, demonstrating that basal FOSIL production maintains a locally insulated, poised conformation prior to signal arrival. Upon HRG stimulation, FOSIL depletion blunts the rapid movement of the locus toward nuclear speckles, diminishes early speckle-proximal FOS transcription, and extends late firing at speckle-distant alleles. At single transcription active sites, nascent FOSIL activity correlates with closer speckle proximity and higher FOS output, and activating the endogenous FOSIL promoter by CRISPRa, but not supplying FOSIL RNA in trans, enhances both speckle association and FOS induction. Together, these findings support a mechanism where endogenous FOSIL activity coordinates pre-stimulus chromatin folding with dynamic nuclear speckle positioning to fine-tune the onset, amplitude, and resolution of immediate-early gene expression.

molecular biology↗