bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Evans, M. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Evans, M. R..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Context-dependent modulation of social space by dopamine receptors in the Drosophila melanogaster mushroom body

Social behavior takes many forms, yet the fundamental principles of social circuit function are thought to be evolutionarily conserved. Foundational behaviors that precede more complex interactions can reveal the mechanisms underlying these circuits. Social spacing, the regulation of preferred inter-individual distances, is one such behavior and can be quantified in the genetically tractable model Drosophila melanogaster. Dopamine and the mushroom body brain region regulate spacing in Drosophila, and extensive dopaminergic signaling occurs within this structure, but receptor-level contributions remain unclear. This report examines how the four dopamine receptors (DopEcR, Dop1R1, Dop1R2, Dop2R) mediate mushroom body-targeted dopaminergic signaling during spacing. Manipulating receptor expression in the entire mushroom body or specific lobes revealed spacing effects that depended on genetic background, receptor identity, sex, and lobe. Receptors could be organized into two opposing pairs: DopEcR and Dop1R1 manipulations increased inter-individual distance, whereas Dop1R2 and Dop2R manipulations decreased inter-individual distance. However, each receptor produced a distinct pattern of effects when male and female data were analyzed across all three mushroom body lobes. These findings support a model in which distributed dopaminergic input engages all four receptors to shape context-dependent spacing decisions, offering insight into social circuit organization in Drosophila and beyond. Article SummaryThis study examined how dopamine receptors in the mushroom body (MB) of Drosophila melanogaster regulate social spacing, the distance between individuals in groups. The expression of four dopamine receptors was manipulated in different MB lobes to identify their contributions to spacing behavior. The receptors showed distinct effects that depended on receptor type, sex, and MB region. Two receptors increased spacing between flies, while two decreased spacing. These findings support a circuit model in which distributed dopaminergic signals are differentially weighted to generate context-dependent spacing decisions. This work may provide insight into regulation of social spacing in other organisms.

neuroscience↗

Neuroligin 3 highlights sexually dimorphic circuitry in Drosophila social spacing

In Drosophila melanogaster, the autism-related Neuroligin 3 (Nlg3) protein is a postsynaptic membrane protein important for synapse development and regulation, which plays a role in social spacing behaviour. Here, we report the localization of Nlg3 to the calyx of the mushroom bodies (MB), optic lobes (OL), and protocerebral bridge (PB). Using RNA interference, nlg3 knockdown in each of these structures recapitulated the effect of knocking down it in all nlg-3 neurons. Hyperactivation and silencing of these neurons in the MB, but not the PB, controls social space in males and females, while hyperactivating and silencing of all nlg3-expressing neurons, including within the MB, PB, and OL, regulates male and female social space. Knocking down neurotransmitter biosynthesis enzymes, which decreases the amount of neurotransmitter release, showed that reducing acetylcholine release from the MB decreased female social space, whereas knocking down any dopamine receptor in the MB increased male social space. Lastly, to investigate the sexually dimorphic effects on social spacing previously seen in nlg3 mutants, we examined a subset of sexually dimorphic fruitless-expressing (fru)P1 neurons known to regulate sexually dimorphic behaviours. Hyperactivation of those fruP1 neurons decreased social space in both sexes, while silencing those fruP1 neurons specifically increased male social space without affecting females. Our findings highlight a sex-specific social space neural circuitry that includes the OL, MB, and fruP1 neurons, while uncovering the underlying basis of some of the sex differences in this behaviour. Article SummaryIn vinegar flies (Drosophila melanogaster), the autism-related Neuroligin 3 protein (Nlg3) controls neuronal development and regulation but also affects fly social behaviour. Nlg3 is localized to the mushroom bodies (MB), protocerebral bridge, and the optic lobes. We show that those structures are important in determining social space in a sex dependant manner. In addition, reducing acetylcholine release from the MB affects female social space, while reducing dopamine receptors of the MB only affect male behaviour. Finally, the fruitless sexually dimorphic neurons control social behavior differently in males and females.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Transient power-law behaviour following induction distinguishes between competing models of stochastic gene expression

What features of transcription can be learnt by fitting mathematical models of gene expression to mRNA count data? Given a suite of models, fitting to data selects an optimal one, thus identifying a probable transcriptional mechanism. Whilst attractive, the utility of this methodology remains unclear. Here, we sample steady-state, single-cell mRNA count distributions from parameters in the physiological range, and show they cannot be used to confidently estimate the number of inactive gene states, i.e. the number of rate-limiting steps in transcriptional initiation. Distributions from over 99% of the parameter space generated using models with 2, 3, or 4 inactive states can be well fit by one with a single inactive state. However, we show that for many minutes following induction, eukaryotic cells show an increase in the mean mRNA count that obeys a power law whose exponent equals the sum of the number of states visited from the initial inactive to the active state and the number of rate-limiting post-transcriptional processing steps. Our study shows that estimation of the exponent from eukaryotic data can be sufficient to determine a lower bound on the total number of regulatory steps in transcription initiation, splicing, and nuclear export.

systems biology↗

SAMHD1 regulates human papillomavirus 16 induced cell proliferation and viral replication during differentiation of oral keratinocytes.

Human papillomaviruses induce a host of anogenital cancers, and also oropharyngeal cancer (HPV+OPC); HPV16 is causative in around 90% of HPV+OPC. Using TERT immortalized \"normal\" oral keratinocytes (NOKs) we have identified significant host gene reprogramming by HPV16 (NOKs+HPV16), and demonstrated that NOKs+HPV16 support late stages of the viral life cycle. Expression of the cellular dNTPase and homologous recombination factor SAMHD1 is transcriptionally regulated by HPV16 in NOKs, and here we demonstrate that E6 and E7 regulate expression of SAMHD1 at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. CRISPR/Cas9 removal of SAMHD1 from NOKs and NOKs+HPV16 demonstrate that SAMHD1 controls cell proliferation of NOKs only in the presence of HPV16; deletion of SAMHD1 promotes hyper-proliferation of NOKs+HPV16 cells in organotypic raft cultures but has no effect on NOKs. Viral replication is also elevated in the absence of SAMHD1. This new system has allowed us to identify a specific interaction between SAMHD1 and HPV16 that regulates host cell proliferation and viral replication; such studies are problematic in non-immortalized primary oral keratinocytes due to their limited lifespan. To confirm the relevance of our results we repeated the analysis with human tonsil keratinocytes immortalized by HPV16 (HTK16) and observe the same hyper-proliferative phenotype following CRISPR/Cas9 editing of SAMHD1. Identical results were obtained with three independent CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNAs. The isogenic pairing of NOKs with NOKs+HPV16, combined with HTK16, presents a unique system to identify host genes whose products functionally interact with HPV16 to regulate host cellular growth in oral keratinocytes.\n\nImportanceHead and neck cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide. The incidence of HPV+OPC has been rising steadily since the 1970s and has recently reached epidemic proportions, according to the WHO. Upwards of 70% of the 600,000 new OPC cases per year are HPV positive, with high-risk type 16 present in 90% of those incidences. A better understanding of the viral life cycle will facilitate the development of novel therapeutics to combat this ongoing epidemic, as well as other HPV positive cancers. Here we present a unique oral keratinocyte model to identify host proteins that specifically interact with HPV16. Using this system, we report that a cellular gene, SAMHD1, is regulated by HPV16 at the RNA and protein level in oral keratinocytes. Elimination of SAMHD1 from these cells using CRISPR/Cas9 editing promotes enhanced cellular proliferation by HPV16 in oral keratinocytes and elevated viral replication, but not in keratinocytes that do not have HPV16. Our study demonstrates a specific intricate interplay between HPV16 and SAMHD1 during the viral life cycle and establishes a unique model system to assist exploring host factors critical for HPV pathogenesis.

cancer biology↗

Human papillomavirus 16 E2 regulates keratinocyte gene expression relevant to cancer and the viral life cycle

Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are causative agents in ano-genital and oropharyngeal cancers. The virus must reprogram host gene expression to promote infection, and E6 and E7 contribute to this via targeting of cellular transcription factors including p53 and pRb, respectively. The HPV16 E2 protein regulates host gene expression in U2OS cells and in this study we extend these observations into TERT immortalized oral keratinocytes (NOKs) that are capable of supporting late stages of the HPV16 life cycle. We observed repression of innate immune genes by E2 that are also repressed by the intact HPV16 genome in NOKs. RNA-seq data identified 167 up and 395 downregulated genes by E2; there was a highly significant overlap of the E2 regulated genes with those regulated by the intact HPV16 genome in the same cell type. siRNA targeting of E2 reversed repression of E2 targeted genes. The ability of E2 to repress innate immune genes was confirmed in an ano-genital immortalized keratinocyte cell line, N/Tert-1. We present analysis of data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for HPV16 positive and negative head and neck cancers (HNC) suggesting that E2 plays a role in regulation of the host genome in cancers. Patients with HPV16 positive HNC with a loss of E2 expression exhibit a worse clinical outcome and we discuss how this could, at least partially, be related to the loss of E2 host gene regulation.\n\nImportanceHPV16 positive tumors that retain expression of E2 have a better clinical outcome than those that have lost E2 expression. It has been suggested that this is due to a loss of E2 repression of E6 and E7 expression but this is not supported by data from tumors where there is not more E6 and E7 expression in the absence of E2. Here we report that E2 regulates host gene expression and place this regulation in context of the HPV16 life cycle and HPV16 positive head and neck cancers (the majority of which retain E2 expression). We propose that this E2 function may play an important part in the increased response of HPV16 positive cancers to radiation therapy. Therefore, host gene regulation by E2 may be important for promotion of the HPV16 life cycle, and also for the response of HPV16 positive tumors to radiation therapy.

molecular biology↗