bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/369975

How molecular mechanisms of resistance affect resistance evolution

Abstract

Combatting antibiotic resistance will require both new antibiotics and strategies to preserve the effectiveness of existing drugs. Both approaches would benefit from predicting optimal dosing of antibiotics based on drug-target binding parameters that can be measured early in drug development and that can change when bacteria become resistant. This would avoid the currently frequently employed trial-and-error approaches and might reduce the number of antibiotic candidates that fail late in drug development.\n\nHere, we describe a computational model (COMBAT-COmputational Model of Bacterial Antibiotic Target-binding) that leverages accessible biochemical parameters to quantitatively predict antibiotic dose-response relationships. We validate our model with MICs of a range of quinolone antibiotics in clinical isolates demonstrating that antibiotic efficacy can be predicted from drug-target binding (R2 > 0.9). To further challenge our approach, we do not only predict antibiotic efficacy from biochemical parameters, but also do the reverse: estimate the magnitude of changes in drug-target binding based on antibiotic dose-response curves. We experimentally demonstrate that changes in drug-target binding can be predicted from antibiotic dose-response curves with 92-94 % accuracy by exposing bacteria overexpressing target molecules to ciprofloxacin. To test the generality of COMBAT, we apply it to a different antibiotic class, the beta-lactam ampicillin, and can again predict binding parameters from dose-response curves with 90 % accuracy. We then apply COMBAT to predict antibiotic concentrations that can select for resistance due to novel resistance mutations.\n\nOur goal here is dual: First, we address a fundamental biological question and demonstrate that drug-target binding determines bacterial response to antibiotics, although antibiotic action involves many additional effects downstream of drug-target binding. Second, we create a tool that can help accelerate drug development by predicting optimal dosing and preserve the efficacy of existing antibiotics by predicting optimal treatment for possible resistant mutants.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Clarelli, F., Singh, B., Palmer, A., Abel, S., Cohen, T., Abel zur Wiesch, P.. 2018-07-16. How molecular mechanisms of resistance affect resistance evolution. https://doi.org/10.1101/369975

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Structure of influenza D virus NS1 reveals a novel Zn-binding site and ssRNA-binding activity

Influenza D virus (IDV) is an emerging pathogen associated with bovine respiratory disease and has potential for zoonotic transmission. Although nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) is a major virulence factor in influenza A and B viruses, the structure and function of IDV NS1 remain poorly defined. Here, we determined crystal structures of the IDV NS1 N-terminal RNA-binding domain (NTD) and C-terminal effector domain (CTD). The NTD retains the conserved homodimeric six-helix fold, whereas the CTD adopts a distinct architecture containing a novel Zn2+-binding site. IDV NS1 CTD preferentially binds single-stranded RNA, and mutagenesis identified lysine and arginine residues critical for this activity. Single-residue substitutions disrupting either the Zn2+-binding site or RNA-binding interface prevented recovery of infectious recombinant IDV. These findings reveal distinct structural and functional features of IDV NS1 and establish the importance of CTD integrity for viral replication. Conservation of key CTD residues in influenza C virus NS1 suggests shared structural features that distinguish influenza C and D virus NS1 proteins from their influenza A and B counterparts.

biochemistry↗

Recognition of the centromere-binding protein Ndc10 by Scm3HJURP directs Cse4CENP-A deposition at native centromeres

Kinetochores connect centromeres to spindle microtubules, ensuring accurate chromosome segregation. Kinetochore assembly at centromeres depends on deposition of CENP-A, a histone H3 variant. Despite considerable progress, how CENP-A is specifically assembled on native centromeres remains an open question. Centromere-specific assembly of CENP-A occurs spontaneously in a cell-free extract system from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but with low efficiency, suggesting that one or more factors are limiting. Here, we show Scm3HJURP, a specific chaperone for the centromeric histone Cse4CENP-A, is one such limiting component. The addition of a complex of Scm3, Cse4 and histone H4 strongly stimulates Cse4 assembly in a centromeric DNA sequence- and dose-dependent manner; in addition, improvements in both Cse4 and kinetochore assembly were more prominent in mitotic versus interphase (G1) extracts. Using the complemented cell-free reconstitution system, we show that distinct Scm3 interfaces with Cse4 and with the Ndc10 subunit of the yeast centromere DNA sequence-recognizing CBF3 complex are essential for centromere-specific Cse4 assembly and cell viability. Thus, recognition of Ndc10 directs Scm3-dependent and locus-specific centromeric histone deposition.

biochemistry↗

Heterogeneous primary nucleation determines Aβ42 fibrilstructure.

The current developments in the field of amyloid fibril structure determination has revealed multiple structures for peptides of identical sequence. This may reflect variations in sample environment or similar nucleation barriers for multiple folds. Here we investigate the influence of aggregating surface and during fibril formation from monomeric amyloid {beta} peptide (A{beta}42). The fibril structures formed in identical solutions in glass vials / bottles and PEGylated polystyrene 96-well plates display very different monomer fold within the fibrils. This is a clear indication of extremely slow homogeneous primary nucleation. Instead, heterogeneous primary nucleation at vessel walls or at the three-line interface between air, water and vessel wall dictate the outcome in each solution, where the initially formed structure is propagated through elongation and secondary nucleation. The results further imply that the conversion towards the thermodynamically stable fibril structure one is slow for A{beta}42.

biochemistry↗