bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/354282

A shared limiting resource leads to competitive exclusion in a cross-feeding system

Abstract

Species interactions and coexistence are often highly dependent upon environmental conditions. This is especially true for cross-feeding bacteria that rely on one another for essential nutrients. The addition of a cross-fed nutrient to the environment can release one species from its dependence on another, thereby altering the species interaction and potentially affecting coexistence. Using invasion-from-rare experiments with cross-feeding bacteria, genome-scale metabolic modeling, and classical ecological models, we explored the potential for coexistence when one cross-feeding mutualist becomes independent. We show that whether nutrient addition shifts an interaction from mutualism to commensalism or parasitism depends on whether the limiting nutrient can be metabolized by only one species or by both species. Furthermore, we show that coexistence is only lost when the interaction becomes parasitism, and the obligate species has a slower maximum growth rate. Surprisingly, models suggest that rates of cross-fed nutrient production have a negligible effect. These results contribute to an understanding of how resource changes, whether intentional or not, will manipulate interactions and coexistence in microbial communities.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hammarlund, S. P., Chacon, J. M., Harcombe, W. R.. 2018-06-22. A shared limiting resource leads to competitive exclusion in a cross-feeding system. https://doi.org/10.1101/354282

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Validating static food web model diet matrices using stable isotope simulation

End-to-end ecosystem models, such as Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE), are valuable tools for resource management. Within these frameworks, trophic interactions, typically derived from stomach contents analyses, govern system-wide energy flow via consumption. However, stomach contents data may be unrepresentative of long-term average diets and assimilated consumption due to factors including differential digestion rates and identifiability of prey, introducing model uncertainty. Because trophic interactions define model structure, variation in modeled diets can alter predictions and management conclusions. Consequently, evaluating and reducing uncertainty in diet matrix compositions is critical for operational acceptance of ecosystem models. Stable isotope analysis provides complementary, time-integrated insight into average diets, but its application for EwE validation has largely been limited to evaluating trophic levels and isotopic niche space. Here, we present a quantitative framework for simulating consumer stable isotope signatures across food webs from parent ecosystem models using a matrix-based mixing model. Using a published Northern Gulf of Mexico EwE model as a case study, we demonstrate Monte Carlo simulation to propagate uncertainty from basal source signatures and trophic discrimination factors. Comparison of predicted signatures with empirical {delta}13C and {delta}34S measurements enables validation of primary carbon sources and benthic-pelagic pathway contributions, revealing agreement in isotope space alongside mismatch in energy pathways. Diagnostic residuals identify discrepancies in diet composition. Model scoring provides a reproducible framework for ranking alternative diet configurations. Redundancy analysis further identifies within-group species coverage differences between stomach contents and isotope datasets as a primary driver of mismatch, highlighting an important consideration for sampling design.

ecology↗

Enhancing Germination and Assessing the Longevity of Native Plants' Seeds with Dormancy through Different Priming Techniques

Vachellia pachyceras and Convolvulus oxyphyllus are native species of arid and semi-arid desert regions, including Kuwait. They are inherently adapted to extreme conditions characterized by high temperature, prolonged drought and limited rainfall. They contribute significantly, to restore the ecosystem by providing food and shelter for wildlife. Despite their ecological importance, seed germination in both species is constrained by dormancy, and natural recruitment of seedlings is limited by narrow and unpredictable rainfall windows, severely restricting opportunities for establishment. In this context, seed priming is an effective pre-sowing technique that enables uniform and rapid germination within the short window of favorable conditions. This study aims to identify the optimal seed-priming techniques for these two keystone native species and to assess the effect of priming on seed longevity. The seeds were scarified to remove the physical dormancy prior to priming treatments. Relative seed longevity was measured for primed seeds through artificial ageing and analyzed using probit analysis and analysis of variance. Results showed that hormonal priming [(mechanical scarification + 100 ppm gibberellic acid (GA3)] for six hours and hydropriming (mechanical scarification + soaking in water) for 8 hours (h) were effective treatments among the tested priming treatments for V. pachyceras. The estimated p50 value (i.e., number of days to lose seed viability to 50%) was 22 days for hormonal priming and 21 days for hydropriming. Mechanical scarification followed by one and half hour of hydropriming was the most effective in C. oxyphyllus (p50 = 74 days). Based on these results, the longevity of V. pachyceras and C. oxyphyllus could be considered medium. Further studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of seed priming on additional ecologically and economically important native species to achieve success in revegetation programs.

ecology↗

Restoration decisions in highly variable systems: Whether, when, and how to enhance kelp

In highly variable ecosystems, natural variability can obscure signals of decline that warrant intervention, as there is often a lack of long-term data needed to distinguish between declines that are transient and likely to recover naturally and those that would be permanent without intervention. Implementing restoration for a species involves deciding on a threshold condition at which to intervene, duration that this threshold needs to be met before intervening, life stages at introduction, and amounts to introduce. Current bull and giant kelp restoration efforts in California were spurred by persistent kelp loss that started in 2013 following a disease outbreak among predators of the primary herbivore and a marine heatwave. We asked how decisions about intervention cue, threshold, wait time, life stage at introduction, and amount affect population outcomes against a backdrop of environmental variability. We analyzed additional context-dependencies on grazing and climate intensity. To address these questions, we built and parameterized a stochastic stage-structured model for bull and giant kelp, in which we simulated kelp enhancement approaches under a range of grazing and climate scenarios. In a global sensitivity analysis of kelp enhancement decisions, we found that grazing intensity and life stages at introduction were the most influential determinants of kelp biomass and persistence outcomes. The kelp enhancement approach involving temporarily introduced juveniles restored the germ banks of bull and giant kelp, but the two species differed in their responses to that intervention, highlighting that optimal intervention approach is species-dependent. Waiting longer for natural recovery before intervening reduced total intervention effort but also reduced biomass recovery potential. These results support empirical findings from kelp enhancement pilot projects in California and highlight context-dependencies that inform restoration decision-making in kelp forests and other highly variable ecosystems.

ecology↗