bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.11.10.687598

Decoupling badger and sett distributions for improved bovine tuberculosis management

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), a zoonotic disease caused by Mycobacterium bovis, continues to challenge eradication efforts in Ireland and the UK, partly due to the role of the European badger (Meles meles) as a wildlife reservoir. Traditional management strategies often rely on sett (burrow) locations to infer badger distribution, which implicitly assumes a correlation with abundance. This study uses data from Irelands national badger culling and vaccination programme (2019-2025) to decouple badger and sett distributions using spatial point process modelling via log-Gaussian Cox processes. By separately modelling the environmental drivers of main sett and badger distributions, and validating outputs for ecological realism with independent badger body weight data, we demonstrate that sett and badger densities are governed by distinct ecological processes. Sett densities are driven by landscape features such as elevation, slope, and proximity to forest edges, while badger densities are more influenced by recent culling history and pasture availability. Our results reveal a spatial mismatch between high-density sett areas and high-density badger areas, highlighting the need for refined metrics in wildlife-based bTB management. These findings underscore the importance of integrating independently derived wildlife distribution models into disease control policies for more sustainable and effective bTB management.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Morera-Pujol, V., Byrne, A. W., Barret, D., Breslin, P., McGrath, G., Quinn, D. J., Ciuti, S.. 2025-11-11. Decoupling badger and sett distributions for improved bovine tuberculosis management. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.11.10.687598

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Increasing threat: Rhynchophorus ferrugineus invaded mainland America through Uruguay.

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is one of the most dangerous palm pests worldwide. Here we report the invasion process of R. ferrugineus in Uruguay. Beyond morphological and molecular identification, we infer the geographic origin of the invasive population, describe the succession of introduced and native palms attacked, provide an easy-to-use key to differentiate the invader R. ferrugineus from the native Rhynchophorus palmarum, and model the ecological niche of R. ferrugineus in Uruguay and neighboring countries. First detected in 2022, the Uruguayan population of the weevil is the first to establish on mainland America, following the earlier island records from Curacao and Aruba. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the Uruguayan R. ferrugineus sequences clustered within a single clade, most closely related to sequences from southern China, and clearly distinct from the sequences of Curacao and Aruba, indicating at least two independent introduction events into the Americas from different source regions. After four years, R. ferrugineus has spread across an area of nearly 80,000 square kilometers and in January 2026 it reached Argentina, invading two points near the border with Uruguay. Over the first two years after the invasion, attacks focused on Phoenix canariensis, yet the three most common native palms in Uruguay, Butia odorata, Butia yatay, and Syagrus romanzoffiana, are currently being attacked. The diagnostic key to differentiate the pair R. palmarum / R. ferrugineus is based on three characters: the tip of the rostrum, the tegminal plate, and the ratio between the interocular space and the width of the rostrum at the base. Niche models showed that Uruguay and the neighboring areas of Argentina and Brazil are suitable for R. ferrugineus, and these are precisely the areas where both the highly susceptible P. canariensis and the native B. odorata, B. yatay, and S. romanzoffiana are present. Neighboring countries should therefore be prepared for the expansion of R. ferrugineus in the short term.

zoology↗

The evaluation of the SumiOne™ spatial emanators against wild Anopheles funestus in experimental huts in Siaya County, western Kenya

Background Spatial Emanators (SEs) are a promising tool for complementing existing malaria vector control interventions. In 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a conditional recommendation for SEs, and two transfluthrin-based products were added to the WHO Prequalification List. As SEs are scaled up, additional products are needed to ensure reliable supply, competitive pricing, and continued innovation. Methods This study evaluated the efficacy of SumiOne SE, containing 10% metofluthrin, in experimental huts in Siaya County, western Kenya. SumiOne SE efficacy was evaluated in six experimental huts, three intervention and three control, using human landing catches (HLCs) and aspiration. Collections were conducted in two 12-night phases, alternating between HLC and aspiration every six nights. Outcomes included reductions in human landing rates, density, exophily and blood feeding inhibition of Anopheles mosquitoes. Results SumiOne SE significantly reduced indoor densities of An. funestus with 63% protective effect (IRR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.20-0.69, p = 0.0087). Overall An. funestus density (indoor and outdoor combined) was reduced by 58% (IRR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.22-0.79; p=0.0222). The rate of exophily of An. funestus exiting was 34% (95% CI: 27-42) in the intervention huts compared to 2% (95% CI: 1-4) in the control huts (p< 0.0001). Blood feeding inhibition for An. funestus was 46% with 44% (95% CI: 36-51) of the collected mosquitoes being blood fed in the intervention huts compared to 81% (95% CI: 76-86) blood fed in the control huts, (p<0.0001). Conclusion These findings support SumiOne SEs potential as a complementary vector control tool, alongside existing core interventions such as Insecticide Treated Nets and Indoor Residual Spraying, particularly in contexts where additional protection is needed.

zoology↗

Phylogeny is not taxonomy: lessons on higher classification from turtle and whale barnacles (Cirripedia: Coronuloidea)

Phylogeny and taxonomy are related but not identical: phylogeny estimates common ancestry, whereas taxonomy must also provide diagnosable, stable, informative, and useful classifications. We examine this distinction using turtle and whale barnacles of the superfamily Coronuloidea, a group with an extensive fossil record, marked ecological specialization, a long history of morphology-based classification, and a recent topology-driven reclassification that merged recognized higher taxa to preserve monophyly. These changes reduced diagnosability and biological coherence, weakened historical continuity, and relied on placements insufficiently tested against morphological and phylogenetic evidence. Our reanalysis of published molecular datasets shows that critical relationships are sensitive to marker composition and taxon sampling. Together with morphological considerations on extant and fossil forms, these results indicate that topology alone is insufficient for coherent higher classification. We argue that higher taxa should be evaluated using complementary criteria: diagnosability, stability, utility, and monophyly, rather than by mechanically translating a preferred tree into Linnaean ranks.

zoology↗