bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2025.10.13.680902

PEPE: Scalable extraction of multi-modal protein language model representations

Abstract

MotivationProtein language models (PLMs) capture intricate amino-acid dependencies, producing embeddings that encode rich structural, functional, and evolutionary information. Despite their potential, current extraction workflows rely on arbitrary choices, with respect to embedding layer, pooling, and padding, that frequently yield suboptimal representations for feature extraction and downstream analyses. Large-scale embedding generation is further limited by inefficiencies in computation and memory: (i) accumulating all model outputs in memory before writing to disk causes severe bottlenecks, and (ii) repeatedly embedding identical sequences to extract different modes introduces redundant computation and drastically reduces throughput and scalability. ResultsWe introduce PEPE (Parallel Extraction for Protein Embeddings), a command-line tool and Python library that enables efficient, high-throughput, and multimodal extraction from protein language models. PEPEs parallelized and streaming-based architecture achieves runtimes several orders of magnitude faster than sequential approaches. Unlike conventional methods--whose peak memory usage scales linearly with output size and fails when memory capacity is exceeded--PEPE maintains stable, low memory consumption, enabling multimodal embedding extraction even beyond available RAM. PEPE supports a wide range of state-of-the-art and custom PLMs through a simple, flexible interface. By combining scalability, robustness, and ease of use, PEPE allows researchers to generate massive, information-rich embedding datasets efficiently, and facilitate the discovery of optimal representations for structural, functional, and evolutionary downstream tasks. By streamlining the generation of diverse embedding configurations, PEPE provides researchers with the necessary data to identify high-performing latent states for specific biological contexts without requiring additional computational resources. Availability and ImplementationPEPE is a command-line tool written in Python and published under MIT license. The source code and documentation are available at https://github.com/csi-greifflab/pepe-cli. PEPE is also available for installation from PyPI under https://pypi.org/project/pepe-cli and deposited on Zenodo at https://zenodo.org/records/15912054.

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhong, J., Cardente, N., Bashour, H., Abbate, M. F., Sandve, G. K., Greiff, V.. 2025-10-14. PEPE: Scalable extraction of multi-modal protein language model representations. https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.13.680902

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗