Biology subjects

Sandve, G. K.

Publications and source records attributed to Sandve, G. K..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) is the most popular assay to identify genomic regions, called ChIP-seq peaks, that are bound in vivo by transcription factors (TFs). These regions are derived from direct TF-DNA interactions, indirect binding of the TF to the DNA (through a co-binding partner), nonspecific binding to the DNA, and noise/bias/artifacts. Delineating the bona fide direct TF-DNA interactions within the ChIP-seq peaks remains challenging. We developed a dedicated software, ChIP-eat, that combines computational TF binding models and ChIP-seq peaks to automatically predict direct TF-DNA interactions. Our work culminated with predicted interactions covering >4% of the human genome, obtained by uniformly processing 1,983 ChIP-seq peak data sets from the ReMap database for 232 unique TFs. The predictions were a posteriori assessed using protein binding microarray and ChIP-exo data, and were predominantly found in high quality ChIP-seq peaks. The set of predicted direct TF-DNA interactions suggested that high-occupancy target regions are likely not derived from direct binding of the TFs to the DNA. Our predictions derived co-binding TFs supported by protein-protein interaction data and defined cis-regulatory modules enriched for disease- and trait-associated SNPs. Finally, we provide this collection of direct TF-DNA interactions and cis-regulatory modules in the human genome through the UniBind web-interface (http://unibind.uio.no).

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

NucBreak: Location of structural errors in a genome assembly by using paired-end Illumina reads

BackgroundAdvances in whole genome sequencing strategies have provided the opportunity for genomic and comparative genomic analysis of a vast variety of organisms. The analysis results are highly dependent on the quality of the genome assemblies used. Assessment of the assembly accuracy may significantly increase the reliability of the analysis results and is therefore of great importance.\n\nResultsHere, we present a new tool called NucBreak aimed at detecting structural errors in assemblies, including insertions, deletions, duplications, inversions, and different inter-and intra-chromosomal rearrangements. NucBreak analyses the alignments of reads properly mapped to an assembly and exploits information about the alternative read alignments. We have compared NucBreak with other existing assembly accuracy assessment tools, namely Pilon, REAPR, and FRCbam as well as with several structural variant detection tools, including BreakDancer, Lumpy, and Wham, by using both simulated and real datasets.\n\nConclusionsThe benchmarking results have shown that NucBreak in general predicts assembly errors of different types and sizes with relatively high sensitivity and with higher precision than the other tools. Such a balance between sensitivity and precision makes NucBreak a good alternative to the existing assembly accuracy assessment tools and SV detection tools. NucBreak is freely available at https://github.com/uio-bmi/NucBreak under the MPL license.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Graph Peak Caller: calling ChIP-Seq Peaks on Graph-based Reference Genomes

Graph-based representations are considered to be the future for reference genomes, as they allow integrated representation of the steadily increasing data on individual variation. Currently available tools allow de novo assembly of graph-based reference genomes, alignment of new read sets to the graph representation as well as certain analyses like variant calling and haplotyping. We here present a first method for calling ChIP-Seq peaks on read data aligned to a graph-based reference genome. The method is a graph generalization of the peak caller MACS2, and is implemented in an open source tool, Graph Peak Caller. By using the existing tool vg to build a pan-genome of Arabidopsis thaliana, we validate our approach by showing that Graph Peak Caller with a pan-genome reference graph can trace variants within peaks that are not part of the linear reference genome, and find peaks that in general are more motif-enriched than those found by MACS2.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2018

Mind your gaps: Overlooking assembly gaps confounds statistical testing in genome analysis

BackgroundThe difficulties associated with sequencing and assembling some regions of the DNA sequence result in gaps in the reference genomes that are typically represented as stretches of Ns. Although the presence of assembly gaps causes a slight reduction in the mapping rate in many experimental settings, that does not invalidate the typical statistical testing comparing read count distributions across experimental conditions. However, we hypothesize that not handling assembly gaps in the null model may confound statistical testing of co-localization of genomic features.\n\nResultsFirst, we performed a series of explorative analyses to understand whether and how the public genomic tracks intersect the assembly gaps track (hg19). The findings rightly confirm that the genomic regions in public genomic tracks intersect very little with assembly gaps and the intersection was observed only at the beginning and end regions of the assembly gaps rather than covering the whole gap sizes. Further, we simulated a set of query and reference genomic tracks in a way that nullified any dependence between them to test our hypothesis that not avoiding assembly gaps in the null model would result in spurious inflation of statistical significance. We then contrasted the distributions of test statistics and p-values of Monte Carlo simulation-based permutation tests that either avoided or not avoided assembly gaps in the null model when testing for significant co-localization between a pair of query and reference tracks. We observed that the statistical tests that did not account for the assembly gaps in the null model resulted in a distribution of the test statistic that is shifted to the right and a distribu tion of p-values that is shifted to the left (leading to inflated significance).\n\nConclusionOur results shows that not accounting for assembly gaps in statistical testing of co-localization analysis may lead to false positives and over-optimistic findings.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Genome Build Information Is An Essential Part Of Genomic Track Files

Genomic locations are represented as coordinates on a specific genome build version, but the build information is frequently missing when coordinates are provided. It is essential to correctly interpret and analyse the genomic intervals contained in genomic track files. Here, we demonstrate that this crucial metadatum (or rather datum) is often isolated from the genomic track files in public repositories and journal articles, which could be a major time thief. We propose best practices to ensure that genome build version is always carried along with genomic track files. Although not a substitute to the best practices, we also provide a tool to predict the genome build version of genomic track files.

bioinformatics↗