Bridging the Python Training Gap for Bioscientists in Brazil: Improvements and Challenges

Crestana, G. S.; Batista, U. d. S.; Funnicelli, M. I. G.; Braga, L. G.; Zuvanov, L.; Bizarria, R.; de Sousa, R. M.; Ferreira, P. H. N.; Winck, F. V.; Margarido, G. R. A.; Varani, A. d. M.; Riano-Pachon, D. M.; Santos, R. A. C.

doi:10.1101/2024.11.25.624749

bioRxiv · 10.1101/2024.11.25.624749

Bridging the Python Training Gap for Bioscientists in Brazil: Improvements and Challenges

Crestana, G. S.·Batista, U. d. S.·Funnicelli, M. I. G.·Braga, L. G.·Zuvanov, L.·Bizarria, R.·de Sousa, R. M.·Ferreira, P. H. N.·Winck, F. V.·Margarido, G. R. A.·Varani, A. d. M.·Riano-Pachon, D. M.·Santos, R. A. C.

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The rapid evolution of high-throughput technologies in biosciences has generated diverse and voluminous datasets, requiring bioscientists to develop data manipulation and analysis skills. Python, known for its versatility and powerful libraries, has become a crucial tool for managing these datasets. However, there is a significant lack of programming training for bioscientists in many countries. To address this knowledge gap among scientists in Brazil, the Brazilian Python Workshop for Biological Data was introduced several years ago, focusing on basic programming concepts and data handling techniques using popular Python libraries. Despite the progress and positive feedback from earlier editions, challenges persisted, necessitating continuous adaptation and improvement to meet the evolving needs of bioscientists.This work describes the advancements made in the 2021 and 2022 editions of the workshop and discusses new suggestions for its ongoing enhancement. Key innovations were introduced in the workshop structure and coordination, including the creation of new committees and the establishment of a code of conduct. Feedback forms were updated to enable real-time adjustments during the event, improving its overall effectiveness. The workshop also expanded its reach by increasing geographical diversity among participants. New didactic strategies, such as pair-teaching, code clubs, and the integration of information and communication technologies (ICTs), were implemented to enhance learning outcomes. Programming best practices and scientific reproducibility were emphasized through talks and hands-on activities, guided by PEP8 conventions. Furthermore, efforts to enhance scientific dissemination were intensified, with an increased presence on social media and participation in international scientific events and communication networks. Finally, we present updated recommendations for students, researchers, and educators interested in organizing and promoting similar events, building on those previously described.

Source connections

Published article ↗

Explore related subjects

scientific communication and education Preprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Crestana, G. S., Batista, U. d. S., Funnicelli, M. I. G., Braga, L. G., Zuvanov, L., Bizarria, R., de Sousa, R. M., Ferreira, P. H. N., Winck, F. V., Margarido, G. R. A., Varani, A. d. M., Riano-Pachon, D. M., Santos, R. A. C.. 2024-11-26. Bridging the Python Training Gap for Bioscientists in Brazil: Improvements and Challenges. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.25.624749

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Evaluating Large Language Models as Tools to Navigate Researchers in Rapidly Evolving Research Landscapes: A Case Study in Cancer Drug Response Prediction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising tools for assisting researchers in automating and accelerating the synthesis of literature reviews. However, their reliability is a significant concern due to issues like factual inaccuracies and hallucinations. The key question is whether LLMs can reliably provide comprehensive, up-to-date overviews and analyses. This study evaluates the performance of three leading LLMs (OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and DeepSeek) on the complex task of generating a comprehensive survey paper on deep learning for cancer Drug Response Prediction (DRP). By testing both standard and Deep Research (DR) / Deep Think (DT) modes of LLMs with prompts of varying detail, this paper assesses key academic dimensions, including reference management, content quality, and analytical depth. Key findings reveal that while DR modes of LLMs significantly improve reliability by eliminating hallucinations, performance variations exist across models and prompts. A trade-off between reference quantity and integration quality was observed, and even the best-performing models lacked the analytical depth of human experts, often requiring extensive human supervision. The study concludes that LLMs currently serve as powerful assistive tools but still cannot replace the critical validation and synthesis provided by human researchers. Choosing the best LLM to use depends on the task in hand, while several strategies can be implemented to improve the produced output.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2026

Ethnobotanical survey of plant mosquito repellents: Knowledge, utilization, and application methods for malaria prevention in the Rwenzori Region, Western Uganda

BackgroundMalaria remains a major public health challenge in Uganda, particularly in rural areas where access to conventional vector control tools is limited. Communities often use locally available plants as mosquito repellents, but documentation of the specific plants used, their utilization levels, and application methods in the Rwenzori region are limited. This study aimed to identify the types of plants used locally to repel mosquitoes, assess the level of utilization of plant-based mosquito repellents, and determine the methods of application employed by communities. MethodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from June to December 2024 in the seven districts and one city of the Rwenzori region, Western Uganda. Multi-stage sampling was used to select 173 household heads. Data were collected using a pre-tested, translated (Runyoro, Rutooro, Lukonzo) KoboCollect questionnaire and analyzed descriptively with SPSS version 23. ResultsEighty-six percent of respondents reported using plant-based mosquito repellents, with 55% relying exclusively on plants. The most used plants were Cymbopogon citratus (citronella/lemon grass, 39.9%), Rosmarinus officinalis (rosemary, 25.7%), and Eucalyptus spp. (24.3%). The primary application method was planting repellent plants around the house (51.4%), followed by hanging injured plant parts in windows and doorways (28.4%). Other methods included burning or crushing plant parts and applying extracts/oils. ConclusionPlant-based mosquito repellents are widely used in the Rwenzori region. This study documents community knowledge and practices that could inform future integrated vector management strategies. Further research is needed to evaluate the entomological and epidemiological effectiveness of the plant repellents that are most used plants and the methods commonly applied.

scientific communication and education↗

bioRxiv2026

With great power comes great responsibility: how scientific supervisors shape the wellbeing of early-career researchers

Scientific supervision is central to the experience of early-career researchers (ECRs), yet its role in shaping wellbeing and retention remains underexamined from the ECR perspective. We analyzed 2,604 anonymous survey responses from predoctoral, postdoctoral and former researchers across 65 countries. Overall, 76% of respondents reported that their supervisors attitude had a moderate or severe impact on mental health. Although most entered academia for vocational reasons, negative experiences with supervisors were among the most frequently reported reasons for leaving among former researchers (48%), comparable to job insecurity and financial instability. Harm was most often associated with poor communication, disregard for wellbeing, micromanagement and competitiveness. In contrast, ECRs valued supportive rather than boss-like supervision, regular communication, realistic expectations and respect for personal time. These findings identify supervisory behavior as a major and modifiable determinant or ECRs wellbeing and retention, and highlight the need for stronger institutional accountability, mentor training and funding incentives that recognize mentorship as a core component of research culture.

scientific communication and education↗