bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.1101/170340

Using competition assays to quantitatively model cooperative binding by transcription factors and other ligands

Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe affinities of DNA binding proteins for target sites can be used to model the regulation of gene expression. These proteins can bind to DNA cooperatively, strongly impacting their affinity and specificity. However, current methods for measuring cooperativity do not provide the means to accurately predict binding behavior over a wide range of concentrations.\n\nMETHODSWe use standard computational and mathematical methods, and develop novel methods as described in Results.\n\nRESULTSWe explore some complexities of cooperative binding, and develop an improved method for relating in vitro measurements to in vivo function, based on ternary complex formation. We derive expressions for the equilibria among the various complexes, and explore the limitations of binding experiments that model the system using a single parameter. We describe how to use single-ligand binding and ternary complex formation in tandem to determine parameters that have thermodynamic relevance. We develop an improved method for finding both single-ligand dissociation constants and concentrations simultaneously. We show how the cooperativity factor can be found when only one of the single-protein dissociation constants can be measured.\n\nCONCLUSIONSThe methods that we develop constitute an optimized approach to accurately model cooperative binding.\n\nGENERAL SIGNIFICANCEThe expressions and methods we develop for modeling and analyzing DNA binding and cooperativity are applicable to most cases where multiple ligands bind to distinct sites on a common substrate. The parameters determined using these methods can be fed into models of higher-order cooperativity to increase their predictive power.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIHill plots remain prominent in biology, but can mask cooperativity\nC_LIO_LIEffective modeling of binding by two ligands requires the use of 3 parameters\nC_LIO_LIWe develop novel ways to find these parameters for two cooperating ligands\nC_LIO_LIWe show how they can be used to enhance the power of established methods\nC_LIO_LIWe describe how this framework can be extended to multiple cooperating ligands\nC_LI

Source connections

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peacock, J., Jaynes, J. B.. 2017-07-31. Using competition assays to quantitatively model cooperative binding by transcription factors and other ligands. https://doi.org/10.1101/170340

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Structure of influenza D virus NS1 reveals a novel Zn-binding site and ssRNA-binding activity

Influenza D virus (IDV) is an emerging pathogen associated with bovine respiratory disease and has potential for zoonotic transmission. Although nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) is a major virulence factor in influenza A and B viruses, the structure and function of IDV NS1 remain poorly defined. Here, we determined crystal structures of the IDV NS1 N-terminal RNA-binding domain (NTD) and C-terminal effector domain (CTD). The NTD retains the conserved homodimeric six-helix fold, whereas the CTD adopts a distinct architecture containing a novel Zn2+-binding site. IDV NS1 CTD preferentially binds single-stranded RNA, and mutagenesis identified lysine and arginine residues critical for this activity. Single-residue substitutions disrupting either the Zn2+-binding site or RNA-binding interface prevented recovery of infectious recombinant IDV. These findings reveal distinct structural and functional features of IDV NS1 and establish the importance of CTD integrity for viral replication. Conservation of key CTD residues in influenza C virus NS1 suggests shared structural features that distinguish influenza C and D virus NS1 proteins from their influenza A and B counterparts.

biochemistry↗

Recognition of the centromere-binding protein Ndc10 by Scm3HJURP directs Cse4CENP-A deposition at native centromeres

Kinetochores connect centromeres to spindle microtubules, ensuring accurate chromosome segregation. Kinetochore assembly at centromeres depends on deposition of CENP-A, a histone H3 variant. Despite considerable progress, how CENP-A is specifically assembled on native centromeres remains an open question. Centromere-specific assembly of CENP-A occurs spontaneously in a cell-free extract system from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but with low efficiency, suggesting that one or more factors are limiting. Here, we show Scm3HJURP, a specific chaperone for the centromeric histone Cse4CENP-A, is one such limiting component. The addition of a complex of Scm3, Cse4 and histone H4 strongly stimulates Cse4 assembly in a centromeric DNA sequence- and dose-dependent manner; in addition, improvements in both Cse4 and kinetochore assembly were more prominent in mitotic versus interphase (G1) extracts. Using the complemented cell-free reconstitution system, we show that distinct Scm3 interfaces with Cse4 and with the Ndc10 subunit of the yeast centromere DNA sequence-recognizing CBF3 complex are essential for centromere-specific Cse4 assembly and cell viability. Thus, recognition of Ndc10 directs Scm3-dependent and locus-specific centromeric histone deposition.

biochemistry↗

Heterogeneous primary nucleation determines Aβ42 fibrilstructure.

The current developments in the field of amyloid fibril structure determination has revealed multiple structures for peptides of identical sequence. This may reflect variations in sample environment or similar nucleation barriers for multiple folds. Here we investigate the influence of aggregating surface and during fibril formation from monomeric amyloid {beta} peptide (A{beta}42). The fibril structures formed in identical solutions in glass vials / bottles and PEGylated polystyrene 96-well plates display very different monomer fold within the fibrils. This is a clear indication of extremely slow homogeneous primary nucleation. Instead, heterogeneous primary nucleation at vessel walls or at the three-line interface between air, water and vessel wall dictate the outcome in each solution, where the initially formed structure is propagated through elongation and secondary nucleation. The results further imply that the conversion towards the thermodynamically stable fibril structure one is slow for A{beta}42.

biochemistry↗