bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

de Bruijne, M.

Publications and source records attributed to de Bruijne, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Automated Quantification of Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in Clinical Brain MRI across Sites

Enlarged perivascular spaces (PVS) are structural brain changes visible in MRI, and are a marker of cerebral small vessel disease. Most studies use time-consuming and subjective visual scoring to assess these structures. Recently, automated methods to quantify enlarged perivascular spaces have been proposed. Most of these methods have been evaluated only in high resolution scans acquired in controlled research settings. We evaluate and compare two recently published automated methods for the quantification of enlarged perivascular spaces in 76 clinical scans acquired from 9 different scanners. Both methods are neural networks trained on high resolution research scans and are applied without fine-tuning the networks parameters. By adapting the preprocessing of clinical scans, regions of interest similar to those computed from research scans can be processed. The first method estimates only the number of PVS, while the second method estimates simultaneously also a high resolution attention map that can be used to detect and segment PVS. The Pearson correlations between visual and automated scores of enlarged perivascular spaces were higher with the second method. With this method, in the centrum semiovale, the correlation was similar to the inter-rater agreement, and also similar to the performance in high resolution research scans. Results were slightly lower than the inter-rater agreement for the hippocampi, and noticeably lower in the basal ganglia. By computing attention maps, we show that the neural networks focus on the enlarged perivascular spaces. Assessing the burden of said structures in the centrum semiovale with the automated scores reached a satisfying performance, could be implemented in the clinic and, e.g., help predict the bleeding risk related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

neuroscience↗

Grey Matter Age Prediction as a Biomarker for Risk of Dementia: A Population-based Study

Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs the gap between brain age predicted from MRI and chronological age associated with incident dementia in a general population of Dutch adults?\n\nFindingsBrain age was predicted using a deep learning model, using MRI-derived grey matter density maps. In a population based study including 5496 participants, the observed gap was significantly associated with the risk of dementia.\n\nMeaningThe gap between MRI-brain predicted and chronological age is potentially a biomarker for dementia risk screening.\n\nAbstractO_ST_ABSImportanceC_ST_ABSThe gap between predicted brain age using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and chronological age may serve as biomarker for early-stage neurodegeneration and potentially as a risk indicator for dementia. However, owing to the lack of large longitudinal studies, it has been challenging to validate this link.\n\nObjectiveWe aimed to investigate the utility of such a gap as a risk biomarker for incident dementia in a general Dutch population, using a deep learning approach for predicting brain age based on MRI-derived grey matter maps.\n\nDesignData was collected from participants of the cohort-based Rotterdam Study who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging between 2006 and 2015. This study was performed in a longitudinal setting and all participant were followed up for incident dementia until 2016.\n\nSettingThe Rotterdam Study is a prospective population-based study, initiated in 1990 in the suburb Ommoord of in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.\n\nParticipantsAt baseline, 5496 dementia- and stroke-free participants (mean age 64.67{+/-}9.82, 54.73% women) were scanned and screened for incident dementia. During 6.66{+/-}2.46 years of follow-up, 159 people developed dementia.\n\nMain outcomes and measuresWe built a convolutional neural network (CNN) model to predict brain age based on its MRI. Model prediction performance was measured in mean absolute error (MAE). Reproducibility of prediction was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) computed on a subset of 80 subjects. Logistic regressions and Cox proportional hazards were used to assess the association of the age gap with incident dementia, adjusted for years of education, ApoE{varepsilon}4 allele carriership, grey matter volume and intracranial volume. Additionally, we computed the attention maps of CNN, which shows which brain regions are important for age prediction.\n\nResultsMAE of brain age prediction was 4.45{+/-}3.59 years and ICC was 0.97 (95% confidence interval CI=0.96-0.98). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models showed that the age gap was significantly related to incident dementia (odds ratio OR=1.11 and 95% confidence intervals CI=1.05-1.16; hazard ratio HR=1.11 and 95% CI=1.06-1.15, respectively). Attention maps indicated that grey matter density around the amygdalae and hippocampi primarily drive the age estimation.\n\nConclusion and relevanceWe show that the gap between predicted and chronological brain age is a biomarker associated with risk of dementia development. This suggests that it can be used as a biomarker, complimentary to those that are known, for dementia risk screening.

epidemiology↗