bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Villeneuve, A. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Villeneuve, A. M..

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Massive programmed DNA elimination during embryogenesis in the trioecious nematode Auanema rhodense

In animals, the germline is usually set aside early in development and its genome is protected to ensure faithful transmission of genetic information to future generations. Genetic alterations in somatic cells are not inherited by progeny, and the somatic genome does not have to be protected from change in the same way. In some species, programmed DNA elimination (PDE) results in the directed loss of genetic material from somatic cells. Here, we report extreme PDE in Auanema rhodense, a free-living nematode with a remarkable, trioecious life history and unusual patterns of sex chromosome inheritance. We find that nearly two thirds of the A. rhodense germline genome is eliminated from somatic cells, with DNA lost from chromosome ends as well as within chromosomes, resulting in fragmentation of the seven germline chromosomes into fourteen somatic chromosomes. Most eliminated DNA comprises multi-megabase tandem repeat blocks. Eliminated DNA on the X chromosome harbours germline-restricted repeats that are distinct from those on the autosomes. The eliminated DNA includes many highly-repeated non-coding RNA loci but few protein-coding genes. Elimination sites are strongly associated with a palindromic sequence motif that likely directs DNA breakage and new telomere repeat array addition. Cytologically, PDE begins at the 12-cell stage of embryogenesis, is synchronous across all chromosomes, and is characterised by the formation of transient micronucleus-like bodies. Together, these findings reveal unusually extensive PDE in a free-living nematode and raise the possibility that germline-restricted repeat architecture may contribute to the atypical sex chromosome inheritance observed in Auanema.

genomics↗

Disordered protein COSA-2 maintains crossover-specific repair compartments to ensure meiotic crossover maturation

Faithful genome inheritance during meiosis relies on crossover repair of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) to connect homologous chromosomes and direct their proper segregation. The formation of crossover-specific recombination intermediates and accumulation of pro-crossover factors occurs at an extremely limited subset of DSB sites, necessitating that the subset of recombination sites designated to become crossovers reliably mature into crossovers. Here we identify C. elegans disordered protein COSA-2 as crucial for meiotic crossover maturation. COSA-2 abruptly concentrates at crossover intermediates in late pachytene nuclei, where it colocalizes and associates with other pro-crossover factors. COSA-2 is dispensable for early loading of crossover factors and for crossover designation, but is required for maintenance of pro-crossover factors at crossover-designated sites and for focal enrichment of factors initially distributed throughout the synaptonemal complex. We define a COSA-2 execution point during late pachytene wherein crossover intermediates transition from a vulnerable state (in which they require COSA-2 to avoid being dismantled) to a state where COSA-2 and local crossover-factor enrichment are no longer required to connect homologs. We propose that COSA-2 scaffolds privileged DNA repair compartments that promote crossover-factor accumulation and protect crossover intermediates until completion of repair, thereby ensuring that crossover-designated sites reliably mature into crossovers.

developmental biology↗

Differential contributions of β tubulin isotypes to acentrosomal oocyte meiosis in C. elegans

Oocyte meiotic spindles must achieve bipolarity and segregate chromosomes in the absence of centrosomes. Here we use high-resolution immunofluorescence microscopy and live imaging to investigate the differential contributions of {beta}-tubulin isotypes (TBB-1 and TBB-2) to assembly and function of acentrosomal spindles in Caenorhabditis elegans oocytes. By combining strains with altered {beta}-tubulin isotype composition with mutations affecting microtubule-crosslinking motor KLP-18 and/or mutations affecting katanin-mediated microtubule severing, we show that TBB-1 and TBB-2 make distinct contributions to promoting spindle bipolarity. Further, by measuring multiple spindle features in wild-type and {beta}-tubulin isotype substitution strains, we reveal contributions of isotype composition to spindle morphology, kinetics of anaphase chromosome separation and maintenance of spindle structural integrity under stress. Together, our data support a model in which {beta}-tubulin isotype composition helps to maintain a balance between microtubule crosslinking and severing activities during oocyte meiosis. We further propose that this balance is crucial for establishing spindle bipolarity, maintaining spindle structures, and modulating the dynamics of chromosome separation.

cell biology↗

Multi-step implementation of meiotic crossover patterning

Crossover formation during meiosis is a tightly controlled process in which genetic information is exchanged between homologous chromosomes to increase the diversity of the progeny. In this process, an excess of double-strand breaks is introduced, but only a limited subset is ultimately processed into crossovers. Imbalances in the distribution of crossovers can lead to errors in chromosome segregation, with devastating consequences on the health of the progeny. However, the selection of which breaks are designated to become crossovers is still poorly understood, as both its timing and the ultimate molecular mechanisms are under debate. Here, we used 3D dual-color single-molecule localization microscopy and real-time confocal imaging, combined with advanced image analysis, to investigate the timing and mechanism of crossover designation in C. elegans. We show that meiotic crossover patterning is not established by a single decision point but depends on a dynamic, multi-layered regulation process. An initial, early selection process restricts potential crossovers to a small subset of double-strand break sites that already exhibit basic patterning features, including assurance and interference. A second, later step fine-tunes this pattern to ultimately ensure genome integrity and promote accurate chromosome segregation. Real-time imaging reveals that although the full process takes more than seven hours, key molecular events occur within minutes, high-lighting how rapid local dynamic changes can give rise to an overall slow but extremely robust crossover regulation program.

cell biology↗

Active maintenance of meiosis-specific chromosome structures in C. elegans by the deubiquitinase DUO-1

Meiotic prophase is characterized by a dynamic program in which germ cells undergo a complex series of associations and dissociations of protein complexes that drive assembly, remodeling, and disassembly of meiosis-specific chromosome structures and dramatic changes in chromosome compaction. Failure to properly coordinate these processes can result in improper chromosome segregation, producing aneuploid gametes and inviable zygotes. Here, we investigate the roles of C. elegans DUO-1, an ortholog of mammalian ubiquitin-specific proteases USP26 and USP29, in mediating these dynamic chromosomal events during meiotic prophase. Cytological analyses of duo-1 null mutants indicate that loss of DUO-1 function leads to impaired assembly of synaptonemal complexes (SCs), loss of integrity of meiotic chromosome axes, ineffective homolog pairing, premature separation of sister chromatids, and late-prophase chromosome decompaction. Further, SC instability in duo-1 mutants correlates with depletion of REC-8 cohesin complexes and is accompanied by massive accumulation of early DSB repair intermediates. By using a dual-AID-tagged allele to deplete DUO-1 during meiotic development, we demonstrate that DUO-1 is continually required throughout meiotic prophase progression, to promote proper axis/SC assembly in early prophase, to maintain axis/SC stability during the late pachytene stage, and to promote/maintain chromosome compaction at the end of meiotic prophase. Together, our data reveal that meiotic chromosome structure and meiosis-specific chromosome architecture require active maintenance throughout meiotic prophase, and that this maintenance is necessary for successful meiosis.

developmental biology↗

Disparate roles for C. elegans DNA translocase paralogs RAD-54.L and RAD-54.B in meiotic prophase germ cells

RAD54 family DNA translocases partner with RAD51 recombinases to ensure stable genome inheritance, exhibiting biochemical activities both in promoting recombinase removal and in stabilizing recombinase association with DNA. Understanding how such disparate activities of RAD54 paralogs align with their biological roles is an ongoing challenge. Here we investigate the in vivo functions of C. elegans RAD54 paralogs RAD-54.L and RAD-54.B during meiotic prophase, revealing distinct contributions to the dynamics of RAD-51 association with DNA and to the progression of meiotic double-strand break repair (DSBR). While RAD-54.L is essential for RAD-51 removal from meiotic DSBR sites to enable recombination progression, RAD-54.B is largely dispensable for meiotic DSBR. However, RAD-54.B is required to prevent hyperaccumulation of RAD-51 on unbroken DNA during a key meiotic sub-stage when protein kinase CHK-2 is active. Moreover, DSB-independent hyperaccumulation of RAD-51 foci in the absence of RAD-54.B is RAD-54.L-dependent, revealing a hidden activity of RAD-54.L in promoting promiscuous RAD-51 association that is antagonized by RAD-54.B. We propose a model wherein a division of labor among RAD-54 paralogs allows germ cells to ramp up their capacity for efficient homologous recombination that is crucial to successful meiosis while counteracting potentially deleterious effects of unproductive RAD-51 association with unbroken DNA.

genetics↗

Robust designation of meiotic crossover sites by CDK-2 through phosphorylation of the MutSγ complex

Crossover formation is essential for proper segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Here we show that C. elegans Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK-2) forms a complex with cyclin-like protein COSA-1 and supports crossover formation by promoting conversion of meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs) into crossover-specific recombination intermediates. Further, we identify MutS{gamma} component MSH-5 as a CDK-2 phosphorylation target. MSH-5 has a disordered C-terminal tail that contains 13 potential CDK phosphosites and is required to concentrate crossover-promoting proteins at recombination sites. Phosphorylation of the MSH-5 tail appears dispensable in a wild- type background, but when MutS{gamma} activity is partially compromised, crossover formation and retention of CDK-2/COSA-1 at recombination sites are exquisitely sensitive to phosphosite loss. Our data support a model in which robustness of crossover designation reflects a positive feedback mechanism involving CDK-2-mediated phosphorylation and scaffold-like properties of the MSH-5 C-terminal tail, features that combine to promote full recruitment and activity of crossover-promoting complexes.

cell biology↗

C. elegans DSB-3 Reveals Conservation and Divergence among Protein Complexes Promoting Meiotic Double-Strand Breaks

Meiotic recombination plays dual roles in the evolution and stable inheritance of genomes: recombination promotes genetic diversity by reassorting variants, and it establishes temporary connections between pairs of homologous chromosomes that ensure for their future segregation. Meiotic recombination is initiated by generation of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) by the conserved topoisomerase-like protein Spo11. Despite strong conservation of Spo11 across eukaryotic kingdoms, auxiliary complexes that interact with Spo11 complexes to promote DSB formation are poorly conserved. Here, we identify DSB-3 as a DSB-promoting protein in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Mutants lacking DSB-3 are proficient for homolog pairing and synapsis but fail to form meiotic crossovers. Lack of crossovers in dsb-3 mutants reflects a requirement for DSB-3 in meiotic DSB formation. DSB-3 concentrates in meiotic nuclei with timing similar to DSB-1 and DSB-2 (predicted homologs of yeast/mammalian Rec114/REC114), and DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 are interdependent for this localization. Bioinformatics analysis and interactions among the DSB proteins support the identity of DSB-3 as a homolog of MEI4 in conserved DSB-promoting complexes. This identification is reinforced by colocalization of pairwise combinations of DSB-1, DSB-2, and DSB-3 foci in structured illumination microscopy images of spread nuclei. However, unlike yeast Rec114, DSB-1 can interact directly with SPO-11, and in contrast to mouse REC114 and MEI4, DSB-1, DSB-2 and DSB-3 are not concentrated predominantly at meiotic chromosome axes. We speculate that variations in the meiotic program that have co-evolved with distinct reproductive strategies in diverse organisms may contribute to and/or enable diversification of essential components of the meiotic machinery. Significance StatementFaithful inheritance of chromosomes during meiosis depends on the formation and repair of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs), which are generated through the activity of a topoisomerase-like protein known as Spo11. Spo11 exhibits strong conservation throughout eukaryotes, presumably reflecting constraints imposed by its biochemical activity, but auxiliary proteins that collaborate with Spo11 to promote and regulate DSB formation are less well conserved. Here we investigate a cohort of proteins comprising a complex required for meiotic DSB formation in Caenorhabditis elegans, providing evidence for both conservation with and divergence from homologous complexes in other organisms. This work highlights the evolutionary malleability of protein complexes that serve essential, yet auxiliary, roles in fundamental biological processes that are central to reproduction.

genetics↗

Quantitative Cytogenetics Reveals the Longitudinal Architecture of Meiotic Chromosome Axes

During meiosis, chromosomes adopt a specialized organization involving assembly of a cohesin-based axis along their lengths, with DNA loops emanating from this axis. We applied novel, quantitative and widely applicable cytogenetic strategies to elucidate the molecular bases of this organization using C. elegans. Analyses of WT chromosomes and de novo circular mini-chromosomes revealed that meiosis-specific HORMA-domain proteins assemble into cohorts in defined numbers and co-organize the axis together with two functionally-distinct cohesin complexes (REC-8 and COH-3/4) in defined stoichiometry. We further found that REC-8 cohesins, which load during S phase and mediate sister chromatid cohesion, usually occur as individual complexes, supporting a model wherein sister cohesion is mediated locally by a single cohesin ring. REC-8 complexes are interspersed in an alternating pattern with cohorts of axis-organizing COH-3/4 complexes (averaging three per cohort), which are insufficient to confer cohesion but can bind to individual chromatids, suggesting a mechanism to enable formation of asymmetric sister chromatid loops. Indeed, immuno-FISH assays demonstrate frequent asymmetry in genomic content between the loops formed on sister chromatids. We discuss how features of chromosome axis/loop architecture inferred from our data can help to explain enigmatic, yet essential, aspects of the meiotic program.

cell biology↗

Interdependent and separable functions of C. elegans MRN-C complex members couple formation and repair of meiotic DSBs

Faithful inheritance of genetic information through sexual reproduction relies on the formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes during meiosis, which in turn relies on the formation and repair of numerous double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs). As DSBs pose a potential threat to the genome, mechanisms that ensure timely and error-free DSB repair are crucial for successful meiosis. Here we identify NBS-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of the NBS1 subunit of the conserved MRE11-RAD50-NBS1/Xrs2 (MRN) complex, as a key mediator of DSB repair via homologous recombination (HR) during meiosis. Loss of nbs-1 leads to: severely reduced loading of recombinase RAD-51, ssDNA binding protein RPA and pro-crossover factor COSA-1 during meiotic prophase progression; aggregated and fragmented chromosomes at the end of meiotic prophase; and 100% progeny lethality. These phenotypes reflect a role for NBS-1 in processing of meiotic DSBs for HR that is shared with its interacting partners MRE-11-RAD-50 and COM-1 (ortholog of Com1/Sae2/CtIP). Unexpectedly, in contrast to MRE-11 and RAD-50, NBS-1 is not required for meiotic DSB formation. Meiotic defects of the nbs-1 mutant are partially suppressed by abrogation of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, indicating a role for NBS-1 in antagonizing NHEJ during meiosis. Our data further reveal that NBS-1 and COM-1 play distinct roles in promoting HR and antagonizing NHEJ. We propose a model in which different components of the MRN-C complex work together to couple meiotic DSB formation with efficient and timely engagement of HR, thereby ensuring crossover formation and restoration of genome integrity prior to the meiotic divisions.\n\nSignificance StatementDouble-strand breaks (DSBs) are deleterious DNA lesions, and impairment of the DSB repair machinery can lead to devastating diseases such as the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome (NBS). During meiosis, DSBs represent a \"necessary evil\": they are required to promote formation of crossovers between homologous chromosomes. Crossovers in turn ensure correct chromosome inheritance during gamete formation, which is essential for viability and normal development of embryos. During meiosis, numerous DSBs are actively created, so meiotic cells must ensure that all breaks are properly repaired to ensure crossover formation and restore genomic integrity. Here we identify C. elegans NBS-1 as essential to properly process meiotic DSBs, both to promote crossover formation and antagonize an error-prone DSB repair pathway, thereby ensuring faithful chromosome inheritance.

genetics↗

Dynamic Architecture of DNA Repair Complexes and the Synaptonemal Complex at Sites of Meiotic Recombination

Meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs) are generated and repaired in a highly regulated manner to ensure formation of crossovers (COs) while also enabling efficient non-CO repair to restore genome integrity. Here we use Structured-Illumination Microscopy to investigate the dynamic architecture of DSB repair complexes at meiotic recombination sites in relationship to the synaptonemal complex (SC). DSBs resected at both ends are rapidly converted into inter-homolog repair intermediates harboring two populations of BLM helicase and RPA, flanking a single population of MutS{gamma} . These intermediates accumulate until late pachytene, when repair proteins disappear from non-CO sites and CO-designated sites become enveloped by SC-central region proteins, acquire a second MutS{gamma} population, and lose RPA. These and other data suggest that the SC protects CO intermediates from being dismantled inappropriately and promotes step-wise CO maturation by generating a transient CO-specific repair compartment, thereby enabling differential timing and outcome of repair at CO and non-CO sites

genetics↗

Time-Course Analysis Of Early Meiotic Prophase Events Informs Mechanisms Of Homolog Pairing And Synapsis In Caenorhabditis elegans

Segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis depends on their ability to reorganize within the nucleus, discriminate among potential partners, and stabilize pairwise associations through assembly of the synaptonemal complex (SC). Here we report a high-resolution time-course analysis of these key early events during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis. Labeled nucleotides are incorporated specifically into the X chromosomes during the last two hours of S phase, a property we exploit to identify a highly synchronous cohort of nuclei. By tracking X-labeled nuclei through early meiotic prophase, we define the sequence and duration of chromosome movement, nuclear reorganization, pairing at pairing centers (PCs), and SC assembly. Appearance of ZYG-12 foci (marking attachment of PCs to the nuclear envelope) and onset of active mobilization occur within an hour after S phase completion. Movement occurs for nearly 2 hours before stable pairing is observed at PCs, and autosome movement continues for roughly 4 hours thereafter. Chromosomes are tightly clustered during a 2-3 hour post-pairing window, during which the bulk of SC assembly occurs; however, initiation of SC assembly can precede evident chromosome clustering. SC assembly on autosomes begins immediately after PC pairing is detected and is completed within about 3.5 hours. For the X chromosomes, PC pairing is contemporaneous with autosomal pairing, but autosomes complete synapsis earlier (on average) than X chromosomes, implying that X chromosomes have a delay in onset and/or a slower rate of SC assembly. Additional evidence suggests that transient association among chromosomes sharing the same PC protein may contribute to partner discrimination.

genetics↗

Meiotic recombination modulates the structure and dynamics of the synaptonemal complex during C. elegans meiosis

During meiotic prophase, a structure called the synaptonemal complex (SC) assembles at the interface between aligned pairs of homologous chromosomes, and crossover recombination events occur between their DNA molecules. Here we investigate the inter-relationships between these two hallmark features of the meiotic program in the nematode C. elegans, revealing dynamic properties of the SC that are modulated by recombination. We demonstrate that the SC incorporates new subunits and switches from a more highly dynamic/labile state to a more stable state as germ cells progress through the pachytene stage of meiotic prophase. We further show that the more dynamic state of the SC is prolonged in mutants where meiotic recombination is impaired. Moreover, in meiotic mutants where recombination intermediates are present in limiting numbers, SC central region subunits become preferentially stabilized on the subset of chromosome pairs that harbor a site where pro-crossover factors COSA-1 and MutS{gamma} are concentrated. Polo-like kinase PLK-2 becomes preferentially localized to the SCs of chromosome pairs harboring recombination sites prior to the enrichment of SC central region proteins on such chromosomes, and PLK-2 is required for this enrichment to occur. Further, late pachytene nuclei in a plk-2 mutant exhibit the more highly dynamic SC state. Together our data demonstrate that crossover recombination events elicit chromosome-autonomous stabilizing effects on the SC and implicate PLK-2 in this process. We discuss how this recombination-triggered modulation of SC state might contribute to regulatory mechanisms that operate during meiosis to ensure the formation of crossovers while at the same time limiting their numbers.

genetics↗