bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Triesch, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Triesch, J..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural oligarchy: how synaptic plasticity breeds neurons with extreme influence

Synapses between cortical neurons are subject to constant modifications through synaptic plasticity mechanisms, which are believed to underlie learning and memory formation. The strengths of excitatory and inhibitory synapses in the cortex follow a right-skewed long-tailed distribution. Similarly, the firing rates of excitatory and inhibitory neurons also follow a right-skewed long-tailed distribution. How these distributions come about and how they maintain their shape over time is currently not well understood. Here we propose a spiking neural network model that explains the origin of these distributions as a consequence of the interaction of spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) of excitatory and inhibitory synapses and a multiplicative form of synaptic normalisation. Specifically, we show that the combination of additive STDP and multiplicative normalisation leads to lognormal-like distributions of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic efficacies as observed experimentally. The shape of these distributions remains stable even if spontaneous fluctuations of synaptic efficacies are added. In the same network, lognormal-like distributions of the firing rates of excitatory and inhibitory neurons result from small variability in the spiking thresholds of individual neurons. Interestingly, we find that variation in firing rates is strongly coupled to variation in synaptic efficacies: neurons with the highest firing rates develop very strong connections onto other neurons. Finally, we define an impact measure for individual neurons and demonstrate the existence of a small group of neurons with an exceptionally strong impact on the network, that arise as a result of synaptic plasticity. In summary, synaptic plasticity and small variability in neuronal parameters underlie a neural oligarchy in recurrent neural networks.\n\nAuthor summaryOur brains neural networks are composed of billions of neurons that exchange signals via trillions of synapses. Are these neurons created equal, or do they contribute in similar ways to the network dynamics? Or do some neurons wield much more power than others? Recent experiments have shown that some neurons are much more active than the average neuron and that some synaptic connections are much stronger than the average synaptic connection. However, it is still unclear how these properties come about in the brain. Here we present a neural network model that explains these findings as a result of the interaction of synaptic plasticity mechanisms that modify synapses efficacies. The model reproduces recent findings on the statistics of neuronal firing rates and synaptic efficacies and predicts a small class of neurons with exceptionally high impact on the network dynamics. Such neurons may play a key role in brain disorders such as epilepsy.

neuroscience

EEG-triggered TMS reveals stronger brain state-dependent modulation of motor evoked potentials at weaker stimulation intensities

BackgroundCorticospinal excitability depends on the current brain state. The recent development of real-time EEG-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation (EEG-TMS) allows studying this relationship in a causal fashion. Specifically, it has been shown that corticospinal excitability is higher during the scalp surface negative EEG peak compared to the positive peak of {micro}-oscillations in sensorimotor cortex, as indexed by larger motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for fixed stimulation intensity.\n\nObjectiveWe further characterize the effect of {micro}-rhythm phase on the MEP input-output (IO) curve by measuring the degree of excitability modulation across a range of stimulation intensities. We furthermore seek to optimize stimulation parameters to enable discrimination of functionally relevant EEG-defined brain states.\n\nMethodsA real-time EEG-TMS system was used to trigger MEPs during instantaneous brain-states corresponding to {micro}-rhythm surface positive and negative peaks with five different stimulation intensities covering an individually calibrated MEP IO curve in 15 healthy participants.\n\nResultsMEP amplitude is modulated by {micro}-phase across a wide range of stimulation intensities, with larger MEPs at the surface negative peak. The largest relative MEP-modulation was observed for weak intensities, the largest absolute MEP-modulation for intermediate intensities. These results indicate a leftward shift of the MEP IO curve during the {micro}-rhythm negative peak.\n\nConclusionThe choice of stimulation intensity influences the observed degree of corticospinal excitability modulation by {micro}-phase. Lower stimulation intensities enable more efficient differentiation of EEG {micro}-phase-defined brain states.

neuroscience

Ongoing brain rhythms shape I-wave properties in a computational model

BackgroundResponses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are notoriously variable. Previous studies have observed a dependence of TMS-induced responses on ongoing brain activity, for instance sensorimotor rhythms. This suggests an opportunity for the development of more effective stimulation protocols through closed-loop TMS-EEG. However, it is not yet clear how features of ongoing activity affect the responses of cortical circuits to TMS.\n\nObjective/HypothesisHere we investigate the dependence of TMS-responses on power and phase of ongoing oscillatory activity in a computational model of TMS-induced I-waves.\n\nMethodsThe model comprises populations of cortical layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons and a population of cortical layer 5 (L5) neurons and generates I-waves in response to TMS. Oscillatory input to the L2/3 neurons induces rhythmic fluctuations in activity of L5 neurons. TMS pulses are simulated at different phases and amplitudes of the ongoing rhythm.\n\nResultsThe model shows a robust dependence of I-wave properties on phase and power of ongoing rhythms, with the strongest response occurring for TMS at maximal L5 depolarization. The amount of phase-modulation depends on stimulation intensity, with stronger modulation for lower intensity.\n\nConclusionThe model predicts that responses to TMS are highly variable for low stimulation intensities if ongoing brain rhythms are not taken into account. Closed-loop TMS-EEG holds promise for obtaining more reliable TMS effects.

neuroscience

Competition for a limited supply of synaptic building blocks predicts multiplicative synaptic normalization and heterosynaptic plasticity

Changes in the efficacies of synapses are thought to be the neurobiological basis of learning and memory. The efficacy of a synapse depends on its current number of neurotransmitter receptors. Recent experiments have shown that these receptors are highly dynamic, moving back and forth between synapses on time scales of seconds and minutes. This suggests spontaneous fluctuations in synaptic efficacies and a competition of nearby synapses for available receptors. Here we propose a mathematical model of this competition of synapses for neurotransmitter receptors from a local dendritic pool. Using minimal assumptions, the model produces a fast multiplicative scaling behavior of synapses. Furthermore, the model explains a transient form of heterosynaptic plasticity and predicts that its amount is inversely related to the size of the local receptor pool. Overall, our model reveals logistical tradeoffs during the induction of synaptic plasticity due to the rapid exchange of neurotransmitter receptors between synapses.

neuroscience

Learning of Active Binocular Vision in a Biomechanical Model of the Oculomotor System

We present a model for the autonomous learning of active binocular vision using a recently developed biome-chanical model of the human oculomotor system. The model is formulated in the Active Efficient Coding (AEC) framework, a recent generalization of classic efficient coding theories to active perception. The model simultaneously learns how to efficiently encode binocular images and how to generate accurate vergence eye movements that facilitate efficient encoding of the visual input. In order to resolve the redundancy problem arising from the actuation of the eyes through antagonistic muscle pairs, we consider the metabolic costs associated with eye movements. We show that the model successfully learns to trade off vergence accuracy against the associated metabolic costs, producing high fidelity vergence eye movements obeying Sherringtons law of reciprocal innervation.

neuroscience