bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Tan, R. K. Y.

Publications and source records attributed to Tan, R. K. Y..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Bruch's Membrane Contributes to the Structural Integrity of the Human Eye

PurposeTo investigate the contribution of the Bruchs membrane and sclera tissues to the overall structural integrity of the ocular wall. MethodsTwenty-three human globes were subjected to biomechanical testing. A piece of sclera measuring 5 x 5 mm was carefully removed at the nasal region, 2 mm away from the optic nerve head. The intraocular pressure was increased at approximately 1 mmHg/s until Bruchs membrane-uvea-retina-tissue layer (BMUR) ruptured. Next, strips of sclera and Bruchs membrane-choriocapillaris (BMC) complex were isolated from the superior fundus region. Uniaxial tension tests were performed at a strain rate of 0.01/s and sampling rate of 15 Hz. The tangent moduli of the BMC and sclera at 0.01, 0.02 and 0.03 strains were compared. ResultsThe rupture pressure of the BMUR was 98.1 {+/-} 21.4 mmHg. The tangent moduli of the BMC at 0.01, 0.02 and 0.03 strains were 2.96 {+/-} 1.44 MPa, 7.68 {+/-} 1.78 MPa and 9.43 {+/-} 2.11 MPa, respectively, and the tangent moduli of the sclera at 0.01, 0.02 and 0.03 strains were 1.09 {+/-} 0.80 MPa, 2.72 {+/-} 1.67 MPa and 5.69 {+/-} 3.27 MPa, respectively. ConclusionThe BMUR was able to sustain relatively high IOP before rupturing. The uniaxial tensile tests showed that the BMC tangent moduli were about 3 times of those of the sclera at strains of 0.01 and 0.02. Although the sclera is approximately 47 times thicker, the BMC is still likely to make a significant contribution (3.51% to 7.42% at strain <0.03) to the overall structural strength of the ocular wall.

bioengineering↗

Iris Crypts Could Reduce the Chance of Angle Closure: A Computational Biomechanics Study Derived from Clinical and Human Iris Data

PurposeTo investigate the effect of crypts during pupil constriction and dilation on the potential for angle closure by performing finite element analysis using clinical and experimental data on human tissues. MethodsA computational model was developed to determine the influence of small crypts (surface area of [~]0.015 mm2) and large crypts (surface area of 0.300 mm2) on the anterior chamber angles during pupil dilation. The model needed permeability data from human subjects, hence 21 enucleated human eyes (72 hours post-mortem) were procured and subjected to a flow set-up previously reported. Finally, 66 subjects were recruited to measure pupil constriction and dilation levels from optical coherence tomography (OCT) videos. ResultsThe hydraulic permeability of the human iris stroma was determined to be 2.55 {+/-} 1.93 x 10-5 mm2/Pa{middle dot}s. The average iris constriction and dilation durations were 0.710 {+/-} 0.213 seconds and 1.24 {+/-} 0.401 seconds, respectively, with pupil diameter changes of 1.16 {+/-} 0.39 mm and 0.75 {+/-} 0.27 mm, respectively. The computational models had starting anterior chamber angles of 51.30{degrees} and final anterior chamber angles of 26.81{degrees} once steady state has been reached. In an extreme case with decreased anterior border layer (ABL) permeability, the anterior chamber angle narrowed to 12.37{degrees}, but the presence of crypts kept the angle above 20.36{degrees}, highlighting the potential of crypts in preventing angle closure. ConclusionsOur findings on the biomechanics of crypts in the iris may drive the development of novel treatments by altering ABL morphology, providing an alternative bypass for angle closure prevention in high-risk patients.

bioengineering↗

Iris Morphological and Biomechanical Factors Influencing Angle Closure During Pupil Dilation

PurposeTo use finite element (FE) analysis to assess what morphological and biomechanical factors of the iris and of the anterior chamber are more likely to influence angle narrowing during pupil dilation. MethodsThe study consisted of 1,344 FE models comprising of the cornea, sclera, lens and iris (stroma, sphincter and dilator tissues) to simulate pupil dilation and to assess changes in angle. For each model, we varied the following parameters: anterior chamber depth (ACD = 2 -4 mm) and width (ACW = 10-12 mm), iris convexity (IC = 0-0.3 mm), thickness (IT = 0.3-0.5 mm), stiffness (E = 4-24 kPa) and Poissons ratio (v = 0-0.3), and simulated pupil dilation. We evaluated for the change in anterior chamber angle ({bigtriangleup}{angle}) and the final dilated anterior chamber angles ({angle}f) from baseline to dilation for each parameter. ResultsThe final dilated AC angles decreased with a smaller ACD ({angle}f = 53.4{degrees}{+/-}12.3{degrees} to 21.3{degrees}{+/-}14.9{degrees}), smaller ACW ({angle}f = 48.2{degrees}{+/-}13.5{degrees} to 26.2{degrees}{+/-}18.2{degrees}), larger IT ({angle}f = 52.6{degrees}{+/-}12.3{degrees} to 24.4{degrees}{+/-}15.1{degrees}), larger IC ({angle}f = 45.0{degrees}{+/-}19.2{degrees} to 33.9{degrees}{+/-}16.5{degrees}), larger E ({angle}f = 40.3{degrees}{+/-}17.3{degrees} to 37.4{degrees}{+/-}19.2{degrees}) and larger v ({angle}f = 42.7{degrees}{+/-}17.7{degrees} to 34.2{degrees}{+/-}18.1{degrees}). The change in AC angle increased with larger ACD ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 9.37{degrees}{+/-}11.1{degrees} to 15.4{degrees}{+/-}9.3{degrees}), smaller ACW ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 7.4{degrees}{+/-}6.8{degrees} to 16.4{degrees}{+/-}11.5{degrees}), larger IT ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 5.3{degrees}{+/-}7.1{degrees} to 19.3{degrees}{+/-}10.2{degrees}), smaller IC ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 5.4{degrees}{+/-}8.2{degrees} to 19.5{degrees}{+/-}10.2{degrees}), larger E ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 10.9{degrees}{+/-}12.2{degrees} to 13.1{degrees}{+/-}8.8{degrees}) and larger v ({bigtriangleup}{angle} = 8.1{degrees}{+/-}9.4{degrees} to 16.6{degrees}{+/-}10.4{degrees}). ConclusionsThis parametric study offered valuable insights into the factors that could influence angle closure. The morphology of the iris (IT and IC) and its innate biomechanical behavior (E and v) were crucial in influencing the way the iris deformed during dilation, and angle closure was further exacerbated by decreased AC biometry (ACD and ACW).

bioengineering↗

A duration-dependent interaction between high-intensity light and optical refocus in the drive for myopia control

PURPOSETo evaluate the duration-dependent and synergetic impact of high-intensity light (HL) and optical refocus (RF) on lens-induced myopia (LIM) development in chickens. METHODSMyopia was induced in one eye in chicks (10 groups, n=126) from day 1 post- hatching (D1) until D8 using -10D lenses. Fellow eyes remained uncovered as controls. Nine groups were exposed daily to continuous 2 hours (h), 4h, or 6h of either HL (15,000 lux); RF (removal of -10D lens); or both (HL+RF). One group served as the LIM group without any interventions. Ocular axial length (AL), refractive error, and choroidal thickness were measured on D1, D4, and D8. Outcome measures are expressed as inter-ocular difference (IOD= experimental - control eye) {+/-}SEM. RESULTSBy D8, LIM increased AL (0.36{+/-}0.04 mm), myopic refraction (-9.02{+/-}0.37D), and choroidal thinning (-90.27{+/-}16.44 {micro}m) in the LIM group (all, P<0.001). Compared to the LIM group, exposure to 2h, 4h, or 6h of HL, RF, or HL+RF reduced myopic refraction in a duration-dependent manner, with RF being more effective than HL (P<0.05). Only 6h of HL+RF (not 2h or 4h) prevented LIM and was more effective than RF (P=0.004) or HL (P<0.001) in reducing myopic refraction, and more effective than HL (P<0.001) in reducing axial elongation. CONCLUSIONDaily exposure to 2h, 4h, or 6h of HL, RF, or HL+RF reduced lens-induced myopic refraction in a duration-dependent manner in chickens. Only 6h of HL+RF completely stopped LIM development. The synergetic effect of HL and RF is dependent on the duration of the interventions.

neuroscience↗

The Structural Layers of the Porcine Iris Exhibit Inherently Different Biomechanical Properties

PurposeTo isolate the structural components of the ex vivo porcine iris tissue and to determine their biomechanical properties. MethodsThe porcine stroma and dilator tissues were separated, and their dimensions were assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The stroma underwent flow test (n = 32) to evaluate for permeability using Darcys Law ({Delta}P = 2000 Pa, A = 0.0391 mm2), and both tissues underwent stress relaxation experiments ({varepsilon} = 0.5 with initial ramp of {delta}{varepsilon} = 0.1) to evaluate for their viscoelastic behaviours (n = 28). Viscoelasticity was characterised by the parameters {beta} (half width of the Gaussian distribution), {tau}m(mean relaxation time constant), E0 (instantaneous modulus) and E{infty} (equilibrium modulus). ResultsFor the stroma, the hydraulic permeability was 9.49 {+/-} 3.05 x 10-6 mm2/Pa{middle dot}s, and the viscoelastic parameters were {beta} = 2.50 {+/-} 1.40, and {tau}m = 7.43 {+/-} 4.96 s, with the two moduli calculated to be E0= 14.14 {+/-} 6.44 kPa and E{infty} = 6.08 {+/-} 2.74 kPa. For the dilator tissue, the viscoelastic parameters were {beta} = 2.06 {+/-} 1.33 and {tau}m = 1.28 {+/-} 1.27 s, with the two moduli calculated to be E0 = 9.16 {+/-} 3.03 kPa and E{infty} = 5.54 {+/-} 1.98 kPa. ConclusionWe have established a new protocol to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the structural layers of the iris. Overall, the stroma was permeable and exhibited smaller moduli than those of the dilator muscle. An improved characterisation of iris biomechanics may form the basis to further our understanding of angle closure glaucoma.

bioengineering↗

Changes in Iris Stiffness and Permeability in Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma

PurposeTo evaluate the biomechanical properties of the iris by evaluating iris movement during pupil constriction and to compare such properties between healthy and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) subjects. MethodsA total of 140 subjects were recruited for this study. In a dark room, the anterior segments of one eye per subject were scanned using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT, SS-1000 CASIA, Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan) imaging during induced pupil constriction with an external white light source of 1700 lux. Using a custom segmentation code, we automatically isolated the iris segments from the AS-OCT images, which were then discretized and transformed into a three-dimensional point cloud. For each iris, a finite element (FE) mesh was constructed from the point cloud, and an inverse FE simulation was performed to match the clinically observed iris constriction in the AS-OCT images. Through this optimization process, we were able to identify the elastic modulus and permeability of each iris. ResultsFor all 140 subjects (95 healthy and 45 PACG of Indian/Chinese ethnicity, Age: 60.2{+/-}8.7 for PACG subjects and 57.7{+/-}10.1 for healthy subjects), the simulated deformation pattern of the iris during pupil constriction matched well with OCT images. We found that the iris stiffness was higher in PACG than in healthy controls (24.5{+/-}8.4 kPa vs 17.1{+/-}6.6 kPa with 40 kPa of active stress specified in the sphincter region; p < 0.001), whereas iris permeability was lower (0.41{+/-}0.2 mm2/kPa.s vs 0.55{+/-}0.2 mm2/kPa.s; p = 0.142). ConclusionThis study suggests that the biomechanical properties of the iris in PACG are different from those in healthy controls. An improved understanding of the biomechanical behavior of the iris may have implications for the understanding and management of angle-closure glaucoma.

bioengineering↗