bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sones, J. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Sones, J. E..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Is there a fly in my soup? To what extent do metabarcoding and individual barcoding tell the same story?

O_LIMetabarcoding has become the method of choice for characterising complex arthropod communities. The extent to which metabarcoded bulk samples will recover the same community composition as individual sequencing of all individuals in the sample remains poorly quantified. Biases such as unequal extraction of DNA from different taxa, primer mismatches and non-random PCR may cause the selective drop-out of species from metabarcoding data. At the same time, DNA metabarcoding may reveal arthropod taxa present not as individuals, but as DNA residues on the surface or in the gut of insects. C_LIO_LITo quantify the consistency in sample contents established by different means, we metabarcoded 45 bulk insect samples, then extracted all arthropods and sequenced them individually. Metabarcoding targeted 418 bp at the 3 end of the Folmer barcoding region, while individual barcodes captured the entire 658 bp Folmer region. The metabarcoding workflow, including PCR amplification, sequencing, and bioinformatics, was performed in three replicates from three separate lysate aliquots per sample. Sequences were assigned to Barcode Index Numbers (BINs) as identical taxonomic categories across data types. C_LIO_LIWe found that metabarcoding is replicable, as different replicates of the same sample recover similar species richness and composition. Individual barcoding and metabarcoding provide the same impression of relative differences in community structure: estimates of relative species richness and relative dissimilarity between sample pairs are congruent among data types. Dissimilarity between data types varies with BIN richness in the sample, but this relationship reflects nestedness rather than turnover: metabarcoding recovers the same set of core species as individual barcoding but adds hundreds of species on top. Any BIN recovered as an individual occurred with high probability in the metabarcoding data, and any BIN found in high read abundances by metabarcoding was likely found as an individual. C_LIO_LIOur analysis suggests that metabarcoding data will closely mimic the sample contents in terms of arthropod species richness and composition. Taxa recovered in low copy numbers in metabarcoding sequence data will typically represent DNA left as residues from past biotic interactions. Barring sequencing errors, both types of data yield biologically relevant insights into the taxa present in the source community. C_LI

ecology↗

Common to rare transfer learning (CORAL) enables inference and prediction for a quarter million rare Malagasy arthropods

Modern DNA-based biodiversity surveys result in massive-scale data, including up to millions of species - of which most are rare. Making the most of such data for inference and prediction requires modelling approaches that can relate species occurrences to environmental and spatial predictors, while incorporating information about their taxonomic or phylogenetic placement. Even if the scalability of joint species distribution models to large communities has greatly advanced, incorporating hundreds of thousands of species has not been feasible to date, leading to compromised analyses. Here we present a novel "common to rare transfer learning" approach (CORAL), based on borrowing information from the common species to enable statistically and computationally efficient modelling of both common and rare species. We illustrate that CORAL leads to much improved prediction and inference in the context of DNA metabarcoding data from Madagascar, comprising 255,188 arthropod species detected in 2874 samples.

ecology↗

Message in a Bottle, Metabarcoding Enables Biodiversity Comparisons Across Ecoregions

BackgroundTraditional biomonitoring approaches have delivered a basic understanding of biodiversity, but they cannot support the large-scale assessments required to manage and protect entire ecosystems. This study employed DNA metabarcoding to assess spatial and temporal variation in species richness and diversity in arthropod communities from 52 protected areas spanning three Canadian ecoregions. ResultsThis study revealed the presence of 26,263 arthropod species in the three ecoregions and indicated that at least another 3,000-5,000 await detection. Results further demonstrate that communities are more similar within than between ecoregions, even after controlling for geographical distance. Overall -diversity declined from east to west, reflecting a gradient in habitat disturbance. Shifts in species composition were high at every site with turnover greater than nestedness, suggesting the presence of many transient species. ConclusionsDifferences in species composition among their arthropod communities confirm that ecoregions are a useful synoptic for biogeographic patterns and for structuring conservation efforts. The present results also demonstrate that metabarcoding enables large-scale monitoring of shifts in species composition, making it possible to move beyond the biomass measurements that have been the key metric employed in prior efforts to track change in arthropod communities.

ecology↗

A reference library for the identification of Canadian invertebrates: 1.5 million DNA barcodes, voucher specimens, and genomic samples

The reliable taxonomic identification of organisms through DNA sequence data requires a well parameterized library of curated reference sequences. However, it is estimated that just 15% of described animal species are represented in public sequence repositories. To begin to address this deficiency, we provide DNA barcodes for 1,500,003 animal specimens collected from 23 terrestrial and aquatic ecozones at sites across Canada, a nation that comprises 7% of the planets land surface. In total, 14 phyla, 43 classes, 163 orders, 1123 families, 6186 genera, and 64,264 Barcode Index Numbers (BINs; a proxy for species) are represented. Species-level taxonomy was available for 38% of the specimens, but higher proportions were assigned to a genus (69.5%) and a family (99.9%). Voucher specimens and DNA extracts are archived at the Centre for Biodiversity Genomics where they are available for further research. The corresponding sequence and taxonomic data can be accessed through the Barcode of Life Data System, GenBank, the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, and the Global Genome Biodiversity Network Data Portal.\n\n\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=61 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/701805v1_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (17K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5c6449org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bc0224org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@309dddorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc2cc8_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

ecology↗

Revealing the Complexities of Metabarcoding with a Diverse Arthropod Mock Community

DNA metabarcoding is an attractive approach for monitoring biodiversity. However, it is subject to biases that often impede detection of all species in a sample. In particular, the proportion of sequences recovered from each species depends on its biomass, mitome copy number, and primer set employed for PCR. To examine these variables, we constructed a mock community of terrestrial arthropods comprised of 374 BINs, a species proxy. We used this community to examine how species recovery was impacted when amplicon pools were constructed in four ways. The first two protocols involved the construction of bulk DNA extracts from different body partitions (Bulk Abdomen, Bulk Leg). The other protocols involved the production of DNA extracts from single legs which were then merged prior to PCR (Composite Leg) or PCR-amplified separately (Single Leg) and then pooled. The amplicon generated by these four treatments were then sequenced on three platforms (Illumina MiSeq, Ion Torrent PGM and Ion Torrent S5). The choice of sequencing platform did not substantially influence species recovery, other variables did. As expected, the best recovery was obtained from the Single Leg treatment, but the Bulk Abdomen produced a more uniform read abundance than the Bulk Leg or Composite Leg samples. Primer choice also influenced species recovery. Our results reveal how variation in protocols can have substantive impacts on perceived diversity unless sequencing coverage is sufficient to reach an asymptote. Although metabarcoding is a powerful approach, further optimization of analytical protocols is crucial to obtain reproducible results and increase its cost-effectiveness.

ecology↗

Expedited Assessment of Terrestrial Arthropod Diversity by Coupling Malaise Traps with DNA Barcoding

O_LIMonitoring changes in terrestrial arthropod communities over space and time requires a dramatic increase in the speed and accuracy of processing samples that cannot be achieved with morphological approaches.\nC_LIO_LIThe combination of DNA barcoding and Malaise traps allows expedited, comprehensive inventories of species abundance whose cost will rapidly decline as high-throughput sequencing technologies advance.\nC_LIO_LIAside from detailing protocols from specimen sorting to data release, this paper describes their use in a survey of arthropod diversity in a national park that examined 20,000 specimens representing 2200 species.\nC_LIO_LIThese protocols can support arthropod monitoring programs at regional, national, and continental scales.\nC_LI

ecology↗

A Sequel to Sanger: Amplicon Sequencing That Scales

Although high-throughput sequencers (HTS) have largely displaced their Sanger counterparts, the short read lengths and high error rates of most platforms constrain their utility for amplicon sequencing. The present study tests the capacity of single molecule, real-time (SMRT) sequencing implemented on the SEQUEL platform to overcome these limitations, employing 658 bp amplicons of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene as a model system. By examining templates from more than 5,000 species and 20,000 specimens, the performance of SMRT sequencing was tested with amplicons showing wide variation in GC composition and varied sequence attributes. SMRT and Sanger sequences were very similar, but SMRT sequencing provided more complete coverage, especially for amplicons with homopolymer tracts. Because it can characterize amplicon pools from 10,000 DNA extracts in a single run, the SEQUEL reduces costs 40-fold from Sanger analysis. Reflecting the capacity of each instrument to recover sequences from more than five million DNA extracts a year, this platform facilitates massive amplicon characterization.

molecular biology↗