bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ruff, D. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Ruff, D. A..

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Progressive loss of independence in neuronal representations predicts cognitive decline

Intelligent behavior depends on the brains ability to represent multiple features of the environment simultaneously while keeping those representations independent1,2. Patients with Alzheimers disease often mix up objects, people, and events3-7, raising the possibility that disease mixes up the way that information is represented in the brain. Here we show that the independence of visual representations progressively breaks down during early stages of disease progression in a rhesus macaque model of Alzheimers disease and related dementias8-10. In visual area V4, representations of different visual features become progressively less independent, such that the representation of one feature is increasingly influenced by the value of another. We term this loss of independence neuronal feature confusion. This neuronal change predicts a specific behavioral consequence: because feature representations become less independent, preferences associated with one visual feature increasingly influence visually guided choices associated with other, independent features. Using an analogous image-selection task, we found the same behavioral signature in people with mild cognitive impairment, distinguishing them from age-matched controls. These results identify a specific and measurable alteration in neuronal population representations that predicts a behavioral change observed across species. More broadly, these findings demonstrate that neuronal population representations can guide the development of sensitive, non-invasive behavioral methods for early detection of functional changes associated with Alzheimers disease.

neuroscience↗

Loss of neuronal population organization links pathology to behavior in a model of Alzheimer's disease

Alzheimers disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) are defined by molecular and cellular pathology and cognitive decline, but linking these levels requires understanding how pathology alters large-scale neuronal activity. We longitudinally tracked behavior, multi-area neuronal population activity, and fluid and histological biomarkers in a macaque model of early-stage ADRD. As pathology progressed, visually guided behavior became increasingly disorganized, reflected in less structured exploration despite preserved task performance. Guided by systems neuroscience principles linking neuronal population activity with organized goal-directed behavior, we found progressive reductions in coordinated neuronal population activity within and between visual and parietal cortices, even as single-neuron tuning and basic feature encoding remained stable. These changes emerged when tau pathology was largely confined to regions providing feedback to visual cortex. This disorganized state appears modifiable: proof-of-concept methylphenidate administration was associated with transient improvement in behavioral organization. Together, these findings identify disruption of neuronal population organization as a defining feature of early-stage ADRD and frame early dysfunction as a disorder of coordinated population activity.

neuroscience↗

Behavioural and neuronal insights into multisensory combination of unpracticed cues.

Effective decision-making requires integrating multiple information sources, weighted by their reliability and context. While classic studies show near-optimal cue combination in extensively controlled laboratory settings and lengthy inperson experiments, everyday choices often occur in less controlled environments. We examined cue combination under these conditions using an online perceptual estimation task in large and diverse participant cohorts. Participants combined cues, including visual motion direction, spatial visual information, and sound. We investigated cue combination with and without cue conflict. Performance varied with age and self-reported ADHD or Autism. Visual cues were combined more optimally than audio-visual combinations. We observed qualitative similarities in an analagous task with non-human primates. We used electrical microstimulation in non-human primates, targeting unimodal or cross-modal association areas. Stimulation of visual cortex was integrated with sensory motion cues, while stimulation of prefrontal cortex promoted winner-take-all choices. These findings suggest distinctions between within- and across-modality integration, with deviations potentially informative of age or neurodiversity.

neuroscience↗

Guided by Noise: Correlated Variability Channels Task-Relevant Information in Sensory Neurons

Shared trial-to-trial variability across sensory neurons is reliably reduced when perceptual performance improves, yet this variability is low-dimensional, so it could be ignored by an optimal readout mechanism. Why then is it so consistently related to behavior? We propose that shared variability both reflects circuit structure and reveals the information communicated to downstream areas. In this framework, the same connectivity that shapes signal propagation also shapes shared variability. Using a circuit model, we show that when sensory signals align with shared variability, behaviorally relevant information is amplified without compromising coding fidelity. Analyses of neural population recordings from multiple brain areas and tasks reveal that the dominant axis of shared variability consistently aligns with task-relevant stimulus features and action plans. Finally, the behavioral impact of microstimulation can be explained by the extent to which it changes projections onto the shared variability axis. These findings suggest that shared variability may illuminate, rather than obscure, the neural dimensions that guide behavior. Significance StatementThe brains ability to use different features of sensory information flexibly across many tasks is essential for complex decision-making. Our study reveals that the correlated variability in neural responses in mid-level visual areas indicates the visual feature that is relevant for behavior. Our biologically plausible network model predicted that it is beneficial for the representation of behaviorally relevant visual information to be aligned with the correlated variability in neurons. We tested and confirmed this in five independent neural data sets. Our results suggest that trial-by-trial variability does not affect the information encoded in sensory neurons but instead is a valuable signal for us to understand which combination of the encoded features is being used by the brain to guide choices.

neuroscience↗

Linking neural population formatting to function

Animals capable of complex behaviors tend to have more distinct brain areas than simpler organisms, and artificial networks that perform many tasks tend to self-organize into modules (1-3). This suggests that different brain areas serve distinct functions supporting complex behavior. However, a common observation is that essentially anything that an animal senses, knows, or does can be decoded from neural activity in any brain area (4-6). If everything is everywhere, why have distinct areas? Here we show that the function of a brain area is more related to how different types of information are combined (formatted) in neural representations than merely whether that information is present. We compared two brain areas: the middle temporal area (MT), which is important for visual motion perception (7, 8), and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), which is linked to decision-making and reward expectation (9, 10)). When monkeys based decisions on a combination of motion and reward information, both types of information were present in both areas. However, they were formatted differently: in MT, they were encoded separably, while in dlPFC, they were represented jointly in ways that reflected the monkeys decision-making. A recurrent neural network (RNN) model that mirrored the information formatting in MT and dlPFC predicted that manipulating activity in these areas would differently affect decision-making. Consistent with model predictions, electrically stimulating MT biased choices midway between the visual motion stimulus and the preferred direction of the stimulated units (11), while stimulating dlPFC produced winner-take-all decisions that sometimes reflected the visual motion stimulus and sometimes reflected the preference of the stimulated units, but never in between. These results are consistent with the tantalizing possibility that a modular structure enables complex behavior by flexibly reformatting information to accomplish behavioral goals.

neuroscience↗

Multiple objects evoke fluctuating responses in several regions of the visual pathway

How neural representations preserve information about multiple stimuli is mysterious. Because tuning of individual neurons is coarse (for example, visual receptive field diameters can exceed perceptual resolution), the populations of neurons potentially responsive to each individual stimulus can overlap, raising the question of how information about each item might be segregated and preserved in the population. We recently reported evidence for a potential solution to this problem: when two stimuli were present, some neurons in the macaque visual cortical areas V1 and V4 exhibited fluctuating firing patterns, as if they responded to only one individual stimulus at a time (Jun et al., 2022). However, whether such an information encoding strategy is ubiquitous in the visual pathway and thus could constitute a general phenomenon remains unknown. Here we provide new evidence that such fluctuating activity is also evoked by multiple stimuli in visual areas responsible for processing visual motion (middle temporal visual area, MT), and faces (middle fundus and anterolateral face patches in inferotemporal cortex - areas MF and AL), thus extending the scope of circumstances in which fluctuating activity is observed. Furthermore, consistent with our previous results in the early visual area V1, MT exhibits fluctuations between the representations of two stimuli when these form distinguishable objects but not when they fuse into one perceived object, suggesting that fluctuating activity patterns may underlie visual object formation. Taken together, these findings point toward an updated model of how the brain preserves sensory information about multiple stimuli for subsequent processing and behavioral action. Impact StatementNeural fluctuations in multiple areas along the visual cortical hierarchy could allow the brain to represent distinct co-occurring visual stimuli.

neuroscience↗

Methylphenidate as a causal test of translational and basic neural coding hypotheses

Most systems neuroscience studies fall into one of two categories: basic science work aimed at understanding the relationship between neurons and behavior, or translational work aimed at developing treatments for neuropsychiatric disorders. Here we use these two approaches to inform and enhance each other. Our study both tests hypotheses about basic science neural coding principles and elucidates the neuronal mechanisms underlying new, clinically relevant behavioral effects of systemically administered methylphenidate (Ritalin). We discovered that orally administered methylphenidate, used clinically to treat Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and generally to enhance cognition (Lakhan & Kirchgessner, 2012; Maher, 2008), increases spatially selective visual attention, enhancing visual performance at only the attended location. And as predicted by our previous work (Ni et al., 2018), we found that this causal manipulation enhances vision in rhesus macaques specifically when it decreases the mean correlated variability of neurons in visual area V4. Our findings demonstrate that the visual system is a platform for understanding the neural underpinnings of both complex cognitive processes (basic science) and neuropsychiatric disorders (translation). Addressing basic science hypotheses, our results are consistent with a scenario in which methylphenidate has cognitively specific effects by working through naturally selective cognitive mechanisms. Clinically, our findings suggest that the often staggeringly specific symptoms of neuropsychiatric disorders may be caused and treated by leveraging general mechanisms.

neuroscience↗

Attention improves information flow between neuronal populations without changing the communication subspace

Visual attention allows observers to flexibly use or ignore visual information, suggesting that information can be flexibly routed between visual cortex and neurons involved in decision-making. We investigated the neural substrate of flexible information routing by analyzing the activity of populations of visual neurons in the medial temporal area (MT) and oculomotor neurons in the superior colliculus (SC) while rhesus monkeys switched spatial attention. We demonstrated that attention increases the efficacy of visuomotor communication: trial-to-trial variability of the population of SC neurons was better predicted by the activity of MT neurons (and vice versa) when attention was directed toward their joint receptive fields. Surprisingly, this improvement in prediction was not explained or accompanied by changes in the dimensionality of the shared subspace or in local or shared pairwise noise correlations. These results suggest a mechanism by which visual attention can affect perceptual decision-making without altering local neuronal representations.

neuroscience↗

Targeted comodulation supports flexible and accurate decoding in V1

Sensory-guided behavior requires reliable encoding of stimulus information in neural populations, and task-specific readout through a selective combination of these responses. The former has been the topic of extensive study, but the means by which the brain achieves the latter remain poorly understood, especially when adapting to changing task demands. Here we introduce a novel theory for adaptive sensory processing based on functionally-targeted stochastic modulation. We find that responses of neurons in area V1 of monkeys performing a visual orientation discrimination task exhibit low-dimensional, rapidly fluctuating gain modulation, which is stronger in neurons that are most informative for the current behavioral task. We propose that this modulation serves as a label that supports adaptive downstream readout. Our theoretical and experimental results show that V1 modulation can be used to decode from neural activity after only a small number of training trials, consistent with observed behavior. In a hierarchical visual neural network model, the modulator-induced labels are learned quickly and accompany task information across several processing stages to finally guide decisions. Consistent with this model, we find that the V1 modulatory signal is also present in the activity of simultaneously recorded MT units, and that its label of task information is preserved. Our findings provide evidence for a novel mechanism for task-adaptive information routing in the brain, through targeted co-modulation.

neuroscience↗

Patterns of neural correlations in V1 vary with the number of objects

Sensory receptive fields are large enough that they can contain more than one perceptible stimulus. How, then, can the brain encode information about each of the stimuli that may be present at a given moment? We recently showed that when more than one stimulus is present, single neurons can fluctuate between coding one vs. the other(s) across some time period, suggesting a form of neural multiplexing of different stimuli (Caruso et al., 2018). Here we investigate (a) whether such coding fluctuations occur in early visual cortical areas; (b) how coding fluctuations are coordinated across the neural population; and (c) how coordinated coding fluctuations depend on the parsing of stimuli into separate vs. fused objects. We found coding fluctuations do occur in macaque V1 but only when the two stimuli form separate objects. Such separate objects evoked a novel pattern of V1 spike count ("noise") correlations involving distinct distributions of positive and negative values. This bimodal correlation pattern was most pronounced among pairs of neurons showing the strongest evidence for coding fluctuations or multiplexing. Whether a given pair of neurons exhibited positive or negative correlations depended on whether the two neurons both responded better to the same object or had different object preferences. Distinct distributions of spike count correlations based on stimulus preferences were also seen in V4 for separate objects but not when two stimuli fused to form one object. These findings suggest multiple objects evoke different response dynamics than those evoked by single stimuli, lending support to the multiplexing hypothesis and suggesting a means by which information about multiple objects can be preserved despite the apparent coarseness of sensory coding. Significance StatementHow the brain separates information about multiple objects despite overlap in the neurons responsive to each item is not well understood. Here we show that some neurons in V1 exhibit coding fluctuations in response to two objects, and that these coding fluctuations are coordinated at the population level in ways that are not observed for single objects. Broadly similar results were obtained in V4. These response dynamics lend support to the hypothesis that information about individual objects may be multiplexed across the neural population, preserving information about each item despite the coarseness of sensory coding.

neuroscience↗

Low rank mechanisms underlying flexible visual representations

Neuronal population responses to sensory stimuli are remarkably flexible. The responses of neurons in visual cortex depend on stimulus properties (e.g. contrast), processes that affect all stages of visual processing (e.g. adaptation), and cognitive processes (e.g attention or task switching). The effects of all of these processes on trial-averaged responses of individual neurons are well-described by divisive normalization, in which responses are scaled by the total stimulus drive. Normalization describes how a staggering variety of sensory, cognitive, and motor processes affect individual neurons (1), but whether different normalization processes could be mediated by the same mechanism remains poorly understood. We and others recently showed that attention has low rank effects on the covariability of populations of neurons in visual area V4 (2-4), which strongly constrains mechanistic models mechanism (2). We hypothesized that measuring changes in population covariability associated with other normalization processes could clarify whether they might share a mechanism. Our experimental design included measurements in multiple visual areas using four normalization processes. We found that contrast, adaptation, attention, and task switching affect the responses of populations of neurons in primate visual cortex in a similarly low rank way. These results suggest that a given circuit uses a common mechanism to perform many forms of normalization and likely reflect a general principle that applies to a wide range of brain areas and sensory, cognitive, or motor processes.

neuroscience↗

Simultaneous multi-area recordings suggest a novel hypothesis about how attention improves performance

Visual attention dramatically improves subjects ability to see and also modulates the responses of neurons in every known visual and oculomotor area, but whether those modulations can account for perceptual improvements remains unclear. We measured the relationship between populations of visual neurons, oculomotor neurons, and behavior during detection and discrimination tasks. We found that neither of the two prominent hypothesized neuronal mechanisms underlying attention (which concern changes in information coding and the way sensory information is read out) provide a satisfying account of the observed behavioral improvements. Instead, our results are more consistent with the novel hypothesis that attention reshapes the representation of attended stimuli to more effectively influence behavior. Our results suggest a path toward understanding the neural underpinnings of perception and cognition in health and disease by analyzing neuronal responses in ways that are constrained by behavior and interactions between brain areas.

neuroscience↗

Learning And Attention Reveal A General Relationship Between Neuronal Variability And Perception

The trial-to-trial response variability that is shared between pairs of neurons (termed spike count correlations1 or rSC) has been the subject of many recent studies largely because it might limit the amount of information that can be encoded by neuronal populations. Spike count correlations are flexible and change depending on task demands2-7. However, the relationship between correlated variability and information coding is a matter of current debate2-14. This debate has been difficult to resolve because testing the theoretical predictions would require simultaneous recordings from an experimentally unfeasible number of neurons. We hypothesized that if correlated variability limits population coding, then spike count correlations in visual cortex should a) covary with subjects performance on visually guided tasks and b) lie along the dimensions in neuronal population space that contain information that is used to guide behavior. We focused on two processes that are known to improve visual performance: visual attention, which allows observers to focus on important parts of a visual scene15-17, and perceptual learning, which slowly improves observers ability to discriminate specific, well-practiced stimuli18-20. Both attention and learning improve performance on visually guided tasks, but the two processes operate on very different timescales and are typically studied using different perceptual tasks. Here, by manipulating attention and learning in the same task, subjects, trials, and neuronal populations, we show that there is a single, robust relationship between correlated variability in populations of visual neurons and performance on a change-detection task. We also propose an explanation for the mystery of how correlated variability might affect performance: it is oriented along the dimensions of population space used by the animal to make perceptual decisions. Our results suggest that attention and learning affect the same aspects of the neuronal population activity in visual cortex, which may be responsible for learning- and attention-related improvements in behavioral performance. More generally, our study provides a framework for leveraging the activity of simultaneously recorded populations of neurons, cognitive factors, and perceptual decisions to understand the neuronal underpinnings of behavior.

neuroscience↗