bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Potter, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Potter, T..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Competition among kin generates balancing selection in a wild population

If an individuals niche is determined by its genotype, then competition for limiting resources should be most intense among individuals of the same genotype. Theory predicts this will act to maintain genetic variation, but whether this mechanism operates under natural conditions is unclear. Using long-term observations of a population of free-living Trinidadian guppies, we asked (i) whether competition was strongest between kin, and (ii) whether this process maintained genetic variation. Competition between kin was 1.5-1.8 times stronger than that between non-kin. This contributed to balancing selection: after [~]10 generations, variation was 29% higher than expected under drift. Our results show that relatedness can play a major role in structuring ecological competition, with broader consequences for theories of inclusive fitness. One-sentence summaryHeritable variation is maintained due to resource competition being more intense among kin.

evolutionary biology↗

Polygyny carries costs in both sexes in Trinidadian guppies

According to sexual selection theory, males should benefit more from mating with multiple partners than females do, as male investment into offspring production is typically lower. For females, empirical evidence indeed often shows diminishing returns or even costs of mating multiply. For males, the assumption often seems to be "the more, the better" - i.e., a steady increase of male reproductive success with mate number - but experimental tests of it are rare. Here we used a laboratory experiment with Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata), known for being promiscuous, to assess how pairing males weekly with 4 vs. 7 females affects both sexes reproductive performance (n = 32 polygynous males and 170 monogamous females). Increased polygyny delayed females reproductive onset by 9% and tripled their risk of reproductive failure. High-polygyny males fathered offspring with 49% more females and had 73% higher daily reproductive output. Yet, they needed 19% longer to initiate pregnancy, and only accumulated more offspring than low-polygyny males after two months. This study suggests that male mating performance is not unlimited. Especially when high extrinsic mortality selects for fast reproduction, less polygyny might be advantageous, and the strength of sexual selection perhaps more similar between the sexes than often assumed.

evolutionary biology↗

Rpadrino: an R package to access and use PADRINO, an open access database of Integral Projection Models

O_LIDiscrete time structured population projection models are an important tool for studying population dynamics. Within this field, Integral Projection Models (IPMs) have become a popular method for studying populations structured by continuously distributed traits (e.g. height, weight). Databases of discrete time, discrete state structured population models, for example DATLife (life tables) and COMPADRE & COMADRE (matrix population models), have made quantitative syntheses straightforward to implement. These efforts allow researchers to address questions in both basic and applied ecology and evolutionary biology. There are now over 300 peer-reviewed publications containing IPMs. We describe a novel framework to quickly reconstruct these models for subsequent analyses using Rpadrino R package, which serves as an interface to PADRINO, a new database of structured population models. C_LIO_LIWe introduce an R package, Rpadrino, which enables users to download, subset, reconstruct, and extend published IPMs. Rpadrino makes use of recently created software, ipmr, to provide an engine to reconstruct a wide array of IPMs from their symbolic representations and conduct subsequent analyses. Rpadrino and ipmr are extensively documented to help users learn their usage. C_LIO_LIRpadrino currently enables users to reconstruct 280 IPMs from 40 publications that describe the demography of 14 animal and 26 plant species. All of these IPMs are tested to ensure they reproduce published estimates. Rpadrino provides an interface to augment PADRINO with external data and modify parameter values, creating a platform to extend models beyond their original purpose while retaining full reproducibility. C_LIO_LIPADRINO and Rpadrino provide a toolbox for asking new questions and conducting syntheses with peer-reviewed published IPMs. Rpadrino provides a user-friendly interface so researchers do not need to worry about the database structure or syntax, and can focus on their research questions and analyses. Additionally, Rpadrino is thoroughly documented, and provides numerous examples of how to perform analyses which are not included in the packages functionality. C_LI

ecology↗

Density dependent environments can select for extremes of body size

Body size variation is an enigma. We do not understand why species achieve the sizes they do, and this means we also do not understand the circumstances under which gigantism or dwarfism is selected. We develop size-structured integral projection models to explore evolution of body size and life history speed. We make few assumptions and keep models simple: all functions remain constant across models except for the one that describes development of body size with age. We set sexual maturity to occur when size attains 80% of the asymptotic size, which is typical of a large mammal, and allow negative density dependence to only affect either reproduction or juvenile survival. Fitness - the quantity that is maximized by adaptive evolution - is carrying capacity in our models, and we are consequently interested in how it changes with size at sexual maturity, and how this association varies with development rate. The simple models generate complex dynamics while providing insight into the circumstances when extremes of body size evolve. The direction of selection leading to either gigantism or dwarfism crucially depends on the proportion of the population that is sexually mature, which in turn depends on how the development function determines the survivorship schedule. The developmental trajectories consequently interact with size-specific survival or reproductive rates to determine the best life history and the optimal body size emerges from that interaction. These dynamics result in trade-offs between different components of the life history, with the form of the trade-off that emerges depending upon where in the life history density dependence operates most strongly. Empirical application of the approach we develop has potential to help explain the enigma of body size variation across the tree of life.

evolutionary biology↗

The evolution of size-dependent competitive interactions promotes species coexistence

O_LITheory indicates that competing species coexist in a community when intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. When body size determines the outcome of competitive interactions between individuals, coexistence depends also on how resource use and the ability to compete for these resources change with body size. Testing coexistence theory in size-structured communities, therefore, requires disentangling the effects of size-dependent competitive abilities and niche shifts. C_LIO_LIHere, we tested the hypothesis that the evolution of species and size-dependent competitive asymmetries increased the likelihood of coexistence between interacting species. C_LIO_LIWe experimentally estimated the effects of size-dependent competitive interactions on somatic growth rates of two interacting fish species, Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) and killifish (Rivulus hartii). We controlled for the effects of size-dependent changes in the niche at two competitive settings representing the early (allopatric) and late (sympatric) evolutionary stages of a killifish-guppy community. We fitted the growth data to a model that incorporates species and size-dependent competitive asymmetries to test whether changes in the competitive interactions across stages increased the likelihood of species coexistence from allopatry to sympatry. C_LIO_LIWe found that guppies are competitively superior to killifish but were less so in sympatric populations. The decrease in the effects of interspecific competition on the fitness of killifish and increase in the interspecific effect on guppies fitness increased the likelihood that sympatric guppies and killifish will coexist. However, while the competitive asymmetries between the species changed consistently between allopatry and sympatry between drainages, the size-dependent competitive asymmetries varied between drainages. C_LIO_LIThese results demonstrate the importance of integrating evolution and trait-based interactions into the research of how species coexistence. C_LI

ecology↗

An ecological explanation for hyperallometric scaling of reproduction

In wild populations, large individuals have disproportionately higher reproductive output than smaller individuals. Some theoretical models explain this pattern - termed reproductive hyperallometry - by individuals allocating a greater fraction of available energy towards reproductive effort as they grow. Here, we propose an ecological explanation for this observation: differences between individuals in rates of resource assimilation, where greater assimilation causes both increased reproduction and body size, resulting in reproductive hyperallometry at the level of the population. We illustrate this effect by determining the relationship between size and reproduction in wild and lab-reared Trinidadian guppies. We show that (i) reproduction increased disproportionately with body size in the wild but not in the lab, where resource competition was eliminated and food availability restricted; (ii) in the wild, hyperallometry was greatest during the wet season, when resource competition is strongest; and (iii) detection of hyperallometric scaling of reproduction at the population level was inevitable if individual differences in assimilation were ignored. We propose that ecologically-driven variation in assimilation - caused by size-dependent resource competition, niche expansion, and chance - contributes substantially to hyperallometric scaling of reproduction in natural populations. We recommend that mechanistic models incorporate such ecologically-caused variation when seeking to explain reproductive hyperallometry.

ecology↗

Life histories as mosaics: plastic and genetic components differ among traits that underpin life-history strategies

Life-history variation reflects phenotypic variation across suites of traits. Differences among life-history strategies result from genetic differentiation, phenotypic plasticity, and genotype-by-environment interactions. If the relative strength and direction of these components differed among traits underlying a strategy, life histories might not evolve as a cohesive unit. We tested this hypothesis on the high- and low-predation ecotypes of Trinidadian guppies, defined by distinct life-history strategies. Using common garden experiments, we assessed how strongly 36 traits were determined by ancestral habitat (i.e., ecotype) or food availability, a key environmental difference between ecotypes. Our dataset was large (1178 individuals) and included six putatively independent origins of the derived ecotype. Traits could be confidently assigned to four groups, defined by highly significant effects of only food (13 traits), only habitat (6), both (6), or neither (11), revealing substantial variation among traits in levels of genetic and environmental control. Ecotype-food (i.e., genotype-by-environment) interactions were negligible. The directions of plastic and genetic effects were usually aligned. This suggests that life histories are mosaics with unequal rates of phenotypic and evolutionary change. Broadly speaking of "life-history evolution" masks a complex interplay of genes and environment on the multiple traits that underpin life-history strategies.

evolutionary biology↗

Substantial intraspecific variation in energy budgets: biology or artefact?

O_LIDynamic energy budget (DEB) models provide a mechanistic description of life-histories in terms of fluxes of energy through biological processes. In these models, life-histories are a function of environmental conditions and of fundamental traits of the organism relating to the acquisition, allocation, and use of energy. C_LIO_LIThese traits are described by the parameters of the DEB model, which have been estimated for over 2500 species. Recent work has aimed to compare species on the basis of differences in DEB parameters. C_LIO_LIWe show that caution is required in such analyses, because (i) parameter estimates vary considerably as an artefact of the types of data used to fit the models, and (ii) there is substantial intraspecific variation in parameter values, reflecting biological differences among populations. C_LIO_LIWe show that similar patterns of growth and reproduction can be reproduced with very different parameter sets. Our results imply that direct comparison of DEB parameters across populations or species may be invalid. However, valid comparisons are possible if differences in the types of data used to fit the models are taken into account. C_LIO_LIWe estimated DEB parameters for 16 populations of Trinidadian guppy, identifying differences in resource allocation and metabolic rate consistent with evolved life-history differences among these populations. C_LIO_LIVariation in parameter values was substantial: if intraspecific variation in DEB parameters is greater than currently measured levels of interspecific variation, the detection of broad-scale patterns in energy budgets across species will be challenging. C_LI

evolutionary biology↗

Fitness functions, genetic and non-genetic inheritance, and why ecological dynamics and evolution are inevitably linked

The Breeders and Price equations are static models of evolution. Recent work has demonstrated how components of these equations, such as selection differentials and heritabilities, can be calculated for each time-step from dynamic, evolutionarily-explicit, structured population models. These dynamic models consist of functions that describe how environmental factors impact associations of genotypes and phenotypic traits with survival, reproduction, development, and non-genetic inheritance. Because evolutionarily explicit versions of these structured models can include feedbacks and can capture all the routes via which environmental variation can impact evolution, they i) provide a more powerful predictive tool for modelling eco-evolution in natural settings than existing approaches, and ii) reveal how key evolutionary parameters incorporated into static models change with time as evolution, or environmental change, proceeds.

evolutionary biology↗