bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ozmeral, E. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Ozmeral, E. J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Classification of Communication and Head Movement Behaviors during Multi-Person Conversations using Deep Learning

Head movements play a pivotal role while engaged in multi-talker conversation by providing non-verbal feedback to partners and enhancing a listeners ability to separate sound sources. Commercial hearing-aids with an on-board IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit, i.e., accelerometers) typically use that information for step-counting and activity levels. At least one device uses it as an input to their environment classifier and integrated directional microphone. None, however, use the IMU to detect specific patterns of head movements to predict behaviors such as nodding, head shaking, listening to a person versus a video, or talking. Training an automatic classifier to accurately detect these behaviors first requires collecting head movement data during multi-person conversation and laboriously annotating each behavior-type for each participant with high temporal precision. From that point, with the goal of training the most accurate model and integrating with the hardware in the hearing aid to improve device performance, the question is how best to model the data. To address this gap, we collected accelerometer data during natural multi-person conversations and paired it with detailed human annotations of communication and head-movement behaviors. Head-movement data was collected from three cohorts of young, normal-hearing individuals (three per cohort) in a controlled, conference-room setting during 50-minute multi-talker conversations. Participants wore hearing aids with on-board accelerometers, and audio-video was recorded for each talker. Videos were manually annotated for communication and head-movement behaviors, including conversational turns and nonverbal cues such as tilts and nods. Temporal and spectral features were extracted from the accelerometer data (windowed into 1-second segments) corresponding to roll and pitch movements. These features, combined with the annotated behaviors, were used to train and test machine learning models. Models were trained on data from all but one participant and then tested on the held-out participant, repeating this procedure across all individuals. Several deep learning and classical machine learning models were compared for classifying communication behaviors (e.g., talking, listening, watching video) and head orientations (e.g., turning left or right, facing down, facing forward). More specifically, various sequence-to-sequence models, a state-of-the-art deep learning technique, were utilized. These models incorporated modern architectural components such as transformer networks. Multiple performance metrics were used to evaluate models, and results suggest that modern deep learning models outperform classical machine learning methods by significant margins. Classification performance improved further when temporal sequence information was incorporated. These results indicate that during multi-talker conversation, hearing-aid accelerometers can automatically classify stereotypical behaviors with high temporal resolution (1-second). Even when tested on unseen subjects, the models remained reliable. This establishes a foundation for more advanced approaches that combine behavioral and movement patterns, further integrate temporal dynamics, and incorporate additional inputs to improve accuracy and ecological validity.

biophysics↗

Selective auditory attention modulates cortical responses to sound location change for speech in quiet and in babble

Listeners use the spatial location or change in spatial location of coherent acoustic cues to aid in auditory object formation. From stimulus-evoked onset responses in normal-hearing listeners using electroencephalography (EEG), we have previously shown measurable tuning to stimuli changing location in quiet, revealing a potential window into cortical object formation. These earlier studies used non-fluctuating, spectrally narrow stimuli, so it was still unknown whether previous observations would translate to speech stimuli and whether responses would be preserved for stimuli in the presence of background maskers. To examine the effects that selective auditory attention and interferers have on object formation, we measured cortical responses to speech changing location in the free field with and without background babble (+6 dB SNR) during both passive and active conditions. Active conditions required listeners to respond to the onset of the speech stream when it occurred at a new location, explicitly indicating yes or no to whether the stimulus occurred at a block-specific location either 30 degrees to the left or right of midline. In the aggregate, results show similar evoked responses to speech stimuli changing location in quiet compared to babble background. However, the effect of the two background environments diverges when considering the magnitude and direction of the location change, in which there was a clear influence of change vector in quiet but not in babble. Therefore, consistent with challenges associated with cocktail party listening, directed spatial attention can be shunted in the presence of stimulus noise and likely leads to poorer use of spatial cues in auditory streaming.

neuroscience↗