bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Morvan, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Morvan, S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Fertilisation of agricultural soils with municipal biosolids: Part 1- Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid inputs to Quebec field crop soils

Municipal biosolids (MBS) are suggested to be abundant, sustainable, inexpensive fertilisers, rich in phosphorus and nitrogen. However, MBS can also contain glyphosate and phosphonates that can degrade to AMPA. Glyphosate-based herbicides (HBG) are used in field crops all over the world. Most glyphosate generally degrades within a few weeks, mainly as aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA). AMPA is more persistent than glyphosate, and can accumulate from one crop year to the next. AMPA is phytotoxic even to glyphosate-resistant crops. The aims of this study were to assess whether applications of MBS significantly contribute to: 1) glyphosate and AMPA contents of agricultural soils, 2) trace metal elements contents, and 3) partial replacement of mineral fertilisation while maintaining similar yields. To this end, four experimental agricultural sites were selected in Quebec (Canada). Soil samples (0-20 cm) were collected to estimate the as yet unmeasured contribution of BSM application to glyphosate and AMPA inputs in agricultural soils. MBS applied in 2021 and 2022 had mean concentrations of 0.69 {+/-} 0.53 {micro}g glyphosate/dry g and 6.26 {+/-} 1.93 {micro}g AMPA/dry g. Despite the presence of glyphosate and AMPA in MBS, monitoring of these two compounds in corn and soybean crops over two years showed no significant difference between plots treated with and without MBS applications. For the same site, yields measured at harvest were similar between treatments. MBS application could thus represent a partial alternative to mineral fertilisers for field crops, while limiting the economic and environmental costs associated with their incineration and landfilling. It is also an economic advantage for agricultural producers given the possibility of using fewer mineral fertilisers and therefore reducing the environmental impact of their use. HighlightsMunicipal biosolids (MBS) offer significant potential for fertilising field crops MBS contain significant amounts of both glyphosate and AMPA Soil chemistry and crop yields were followed in MBS treated and untreated plots Glyphosate and AMPA contents in soil do not increase with MBS treatment MBS are a good substitute for mineral fertilisers leading to similarly crop yields Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=78 SRC="FIGDIR/small/571753v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c77e75org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13f483dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19fbe42org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@83f04c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

ecology↗

Fertilisation of agricultural soils with municipal biosoilds: Part 2- Site properties, environmental factors, and crop identify influence soil bacterial communities more than municipal biosolid application

Reducing the environmental impact of Canadian field crop agriculture, including the reliance on conventional synthesised fertilisers, are key societal targets for establishing long-term sustainable practices. Municipal biosolids (MSB) are an abundant, residual organic material, rich in phosphate, nitrogen and other oligo-nutrients, that could be used in conjunction with conventional fertilisers to decrease their use. Though MBS have previously been shown to be an effective fertiliser substitute for different crops, including corn and soybean, there remain key knowledge gaps concerning the impact of MBS on the resident soil bacterial communities in agro-ecosystems. We hypothesised that the MBS fertiliser amendment would not significantly impact the structure or function of the soil bacterial communities, nor contribute to the spread of human pathogenic bacteria, in corn or soybean agricultural systems. In field experiments, fertiliser regimes for both crops were amended with MBS, and compared to corn and soybean plots with standard fertiliser treatments. We repeated this across four different agricultural sites in Quebec, over 2021 and 2022. We sampled MBS-treated, and untreated soils, and identified the composition of the soil bacterial communities via 16S rRNA metabarcoding. We found no indication that the MBS fertiliser amendment altered the structure of the soil bacterial communities, but rather that the soil type and crop identities were the most significant factors in structuring the bacterial communities. Moreover, there was no evidence that the MBS-treated soils experienced a shift in functions, nor contributed potential human bacterial pathogens over the two years of our study. Our analysis indicates that not only can MBS function as substitutes for conventional, synthesised fertilisers, but that they also do not disrupt the structure, or function, of the resident soil bacterial communities in the short term. Finally, we suggest that the use of MBS in agro-ecosystems poses no greater concern to the public than existing soil bacterial communities. HighlightsO_LIMunicipal biosolids may represent a sustainable fertiliser substitute C_LIO_LIBut, the impact of biosolids on soil bacteria in agricultural fields is unknown C_LIO_LIUsing 16S rRNA metabarcoding we analysed community structure and functions C_LIO_LIWe found no disruption of soil bacterial communities fertilised with biosolids C_LIO_LIBiosolids are safe, sustainable fertilisers with little impact on soil bacteria C_LI Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=115 SRC="FIGDIR/small/571735v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b9ca2corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8818d2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1158864org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ad952f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

microbiology↗

How does fertilization impact the wild blueberry microbiome

Wild blueberries production is regarded as less intensive than other agricultural systems, although several agricultural practices are commonly implemented to increase crop yields and to mitigate pets and pathogen attacks. Fertilization, organic or mineral, is used to increase soil nutrient availability and improve fruit yield. Wild blueberry plants are also known to depend on their microbiome to overcome the lack of nutrient availability in the soil and their symbiosis with ericoid mycorrhizal fungi is thought to be crucial in that regard. As fertilization can alter crop microbial communities, our study aimed to measure the impact of this practice in a wild blueberry setting, focusing on the bacterial and fungal communities found in the roots and rhizosphere of Vaccinium angustifolium Ait., both at the time of application and more than year later during the harvest season. Our study indicates that fertilization, whether mineral or organic, has a minimal effect on microbial communities. One year after application, fertilization does not seem to have a negative repercussion on the ericoid mycorrhizal (ErM) fungal community as no significant differences were observed in terms of relative abundance on known and putative ErM taxa between the control and the two fertilizer treatments. The fact that fertilization is applied at a low rate could explain this absence of effect on the microbial communities. However, longer-term studies are needed to ensure that repeated fertilization does not cause any shifts in microbial communities that could be detrimental to the wild blueberry nutrition. ImportanceThis study examines the impact of fertilization, whether organic or mineral, on microbial communities in the roots and rhizosphere of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). both Fertilization is commonly used to enhance soil nutrient availability and improve fruit yield, but its effects on the plants microbiome, particularly on the ericoid mycorrhizal fungi (ErM), are not well understood. The samples were taken both during the pruning season, 3 months after the treatment, and one year later, during harvest season. The results suggest that fertilization has minimal impact on the microbial communities. One year after application, no significant differences were observed in the relative abundance of known and putative ErM taxa between the control group and the two fertilizer-treated groups. The low amount of fertilization applied could explain these results. However, longer-term research are needed to ensure that repeated fertilization does not lead to detrimental shifts in microbial communities affecting wild blueberry nutrition.

microbiology↗