Biology subjects

Lenstra, T. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Lenstra, T. L..

12 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

A Cooperative Mechanism of Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Target Search

Rapid gene activation requires transcription factors (TFs) to locate their target motifs within vast genomes. In bacteria, TF target search is accelerated by combining 3D diffusion with 1D sliding, called facilitated diffusion, yet whether eukaryotic TFs rely on similar strategies has remained unresolved due to the lack of direct measurements in living cells. Here, we directly visualize eukaryotic TF target search in living cells by labeling a single TF per nucleus and visualizing its binding to its endogenous locus. Using the budding yeast TF Gal4, we find that efficient target localization occurs near the diffusion limit and does not require facilitated diffusion. Instead, rapid association requires cooperative self-interactions mediated by an intrinsically-disordered central region (IDR), independent of the activation domain. Replacing the Gal4 IDR with human self-interacting IDRs (EWS or FUS) restores efficient search, demonstrating that self-interactions are a general and portable feature for search. A second structured dimerization domain further cooperatives with the IDR to stabilize binding at neighboring motifs, revealing two mechanistically separable forms of cooperativity that together govern TF function. These findings highlight that facilitated diffusion is not strictly required and establish cooperative IDR-driven self-interactions as a key mechanism to enable rapid target recognition in eukaryotic cells.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2025

Recruitment of Fpt1 to tRNA genes requires TFIIIB and the N-terminal TPR array of TFIIIC subunit {tau}131

Transfer-RNA genes (tDNAs) in budding yeast recruit varying amounts of Fpt1, a regulator of RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII) occupancy. Fpt1 occupancy resembles that of the general transcription factor TFIIIC but how Fpt1 is recruited to tDNAs remains unclear. Here we show that both TFIIIB and TFIIIC are required for Fpt1 binding under active as well as repressive RNAPIII conditions. Depletion of TFIIIB reduced Fpt1 occupancy without affecting TFIIIC. In contrast, TFIIIC depletion led to reduced Fpt1 and a gene-specific reduction in TFIIIB occupancy. Moreover, upon depletion of TFIIIC, Fpt1 and TFIIIB were lost to different extents. We identified the C-terminal intrinsically disordered region of Fpt1 as critical for increased Fpt1 binding under repressive conditions. Within this region, a short -helix was predicted to interact with the N-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat array of the TFIIIC subunit {tau}131, a region also known to interact with TFIIIB. Deletion of this -helix abrogated stress-induced Fpt1 recruitment to tDNAs, as did mutations in the predicted interaction surface of {tau}131, while having a milder effect on TFIIIB occupancy. Together, these findings uncovered a dual and dynamic mechanism of Fpt1 recruitment to tDNAs with independent contributions of TFIIIB and TFIIIC.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Transcription factor exchange enables prolonged transcriptional bursts

Single-molecule imaging inside living cells has revealed that transcription factors (TFs) bind to DNA transiently, but a long-standing question is how this transient binding is related to transcription activation. Here, we devised a microscopy method to simultaneously measure transient TF binding at a single locus and the effect of these binding events on transcription. We show that DNA binding of the yeast TF Gal4 activates transcription of a target gene within a few seconds, with at least [~]20% efficiency and with a high initiation rate of [~]1 RNA/s. Gal4 DNA dissociation decreases transcription rapidly. Moreover, at a gene with multiple binding sites, individual Gal4 molecules only rarely stay bound throughout the entire burst, but instead frequently exchange during a burst to increase the transcriptional burst duration. Our results suggest a mechanism for enhancer regulation in more complex eukaryotes, where TF cooperativity and exchange enable robust transcription activation.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2023

Competition between transcription and loop extrusion modulates promoter and enhancer dynamics

The spatiotemporal configuration of genes with distal regulatory elements, and the impact of chromatin mobility on transcription, remain unclear. Loop extrusion is an attractive model for bringing genetic elements together, but how this functionally interacts with transcription is also largely unknown. We combine live tracking of genomic loci and nascent transcripts with molecular dynamics simulations to assess the 4D arrangement of the Sox2 gene and its enhancer, in response to a battery of perturbations. We find that alterations in chromatin mobility, not promoter-enhancer distance, is more informative about transcriptional status. Active elements display more constrained mobility, consistent with confinement within specialized nuclear sites, and alterations in enhancer mobility distinguish poised from transcribing alleles. Strikingly, we find that whereas loop extrusion and transcription factor-mediated clustering contribute to promoter-enhancer proximity, they have antagonistic effects on chromatin dynamics. This provides an experimental framework for the underappreciated role of chromatin dynamics in genome regulation.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Transcription factor clusters enable target search but do not contribute to target gene activation

Many transcription factors (TFs) localize in nuclear clusters of locally increased concentrations, but how TF clustering is regulated and how it influences gene expression is not well understood. Here, we use quantitative microscopy in living cells to study the regulation and function of clustering of the budding yeast TF Gal4 in its endogenous context. Our results show that Gal4 cluster formation is facilitated by, but does not completely depend on DNA binding and intrinsically disordered regions. Gal4 cluster properties are regulated by the Gal4-inhibitor Gal80 and Gal4 concentration. Moreover, we discover that clustering acts as a double-edged sword: self-interactions aid TF recruitment to target genes, but recruited Gal4 molecules that are not DNA-bound do not contribute to, and may even inhibit, transcription activation. We propose that cells need to balance the different effects of TF clustering on target search and transcription activation to facilitate proper gene expression.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2022

A Telltale Sign of Irreversibility in Transcriptional Regulation

Transcription occurs in stochastic bursts, i.e., transcription events are temporally clustered. The clustering does not ensue from environmental fluctuations but springs from the intrinsically stochastic behavior of the regulatory process that controls transcription. Based on microscopic observations of transcription at a single gene copy of yeast, we show that the regulatory process is cyclic and irreversible, i.e., the process violates the detailed balance conditions for thermodynamic equilibrium. The theoretical significance of this finding is discussed.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2022

DNA supercoiling restricts the transcriptional bursting of neighboring eukaryotic genes

DNA supercoiling has emerged as a major contributor to gene regulation in bacteria. The impact of DNA supercoiling on transcription dynamics in eukaryotes is less clear. Here, using single-molecule dual-color RNA imaging in budding yeast, we show that transcriptional bursting of the divergent and tandem GAL genes is coupled. Upon topoisomerase degradation, supercoils that buildup from transcription inhibit subsequent transcription at neighboring genes, thereby reducing their simultaneous bursting. GAL gene transcription is inhibited more by negative than by positive supercoiling accumulation. Unlike bacteria, wildtype yeast has sufficient topoisomerase levels to minimize inhibition from supercoils at adjacent genes. Overall, we discover fundamental differences in supercoiling-mediated gene regulation between bacteria and yeast and show that rapid supercoiling release in eukaryotes ensures proper gene expression of neighboring genes. One sentence summaryTranscription causes twisting of the DNA double helix, which can inhibit transcription of adjacent genes.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Dynamic epistasis analysis reveals how chromatin remodeling regulates transcriptional bursting

Transcriptional bursting has been linked to the stochastic positioning of nucleosomes. However, how bursting is regulated by remodeling of promoter nucleosomes is unknown. Here, we use single-molecule live-cell imaging of GAL10 transcription in budding yeast to measure how transcriptional bursting changes upon single and double perturbations of chromatin remodeling factors, the transcription factor Gal4 and preinitiation complex (PIC) components. Using dynamic epistasis analysis, we reveal how remodeling of different nucleosomes regulates individual transcriptional bursting parameters. At the nucleosome covering the Gal4 binding sites, RSC acts synergistically with Gal4 binding to facilitate each burst. Conversely, nucleosome remodeling at the TATA box controls only the first burst upon galactose induction. In the absence of remodelers, nucleosomes at canonical TATA boxes are displaced by TBP binding to allow for transcription activation. Overall, our results reveal how promoter nucleosome remodeling, together with transcription factor and PIC binding regulates the kinetics of transcriptional bursting.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Accurate inference of stochastic gene expression from nascent transcript heterogeneity

Transcriptional rates are often estimated by fitting the distribution of mature mRNA numbers measured using smFISH (single molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization) with the distribution predicted by the telegraph model of gene expression, which defines two promoter states of activity and inactivity. However, fluctuations in mature mRNA numbers are strongly affected by processes downstream of transcription. In addition, the telegraph model assumes one gene copy, but in experiments cells may have two gene copies as cells replicate their genome during the cell cycle. Whilst it is often presumed that post-transcriptional noise and gene copy number variation affect transcriptional parameter estimation, the size of the error introduced remains unclear. To address this issue, here we measure both mature and nascent mRNA distributions of GAL10 in yeast cells using smFISH and classify each cell according to its cell cycle phase. We infer transcriptional parameters from mature and nascent mRNA distributions, with and without accounting for cell cycle phase and compare the results to live-cell transcription measurements of the same gene. We find that: (i) correcting for cell cycle dynamics decreases the promoter switching rates and the initiation rate, and increases the fraction of time spent in the active state, as well as the burst size; (ii) additional correction for post-transcriptional noise leads to further increases in the burst size and to a large reduction in the errors in parameter estimation. Furthermore, we outline how to correctly adjust for measurement noise in smFISH due to uncertainty in transcription site localisation when introns cannot be labelled. Simulations with parameters estimated from nascent smFISH data, which is corrected for cell cycle phases and measurement noise, leads to autocorrelation functions that agree with those obtained from live-cell imaging.

systems biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Hda1C restricts the transcription initiation frequency to limit divergent non-coding RNA transcription

Nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) at gene promoters support initiation of RNA Polymerase II transcription. Interestingly, transcription often initiates in both directions, resulting in an mRNA, and a divergent non-coding (DNC) transcript with an unclear purpose. Here, we characterized the genetic architecture and molecular mechanism of DNC transcription in budding yeast. We identified the Hda1 histone deacetylase complex (Hda1C) as a repressor of DNC in high-throughput reverse genetic screens based on quantitative single-cell fluorescence measurements. Nascent transcription profiling showed a genome-wide role of Hda1C in DNC repression. Live-cell imaging of transcription revealed that Hda1C reduced the frequency of DNC transcription. Hda1C contributed to decreased acetylation of histone H3 in DNC regions, supporting DNC repression by histone deacetylation. Our data support the interpretation that DNC results as a consequence of the NDR-based architecture of eukaryotic promoters, but that it is governed by locus-specific repression to maintain genome fidelity.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

RNA Pol II Length and Disorder Enable Cooperative Scaling of Transcriptional Bursting

RNA Polymerase II contains a disordered C-terminal domain (CTD) whose length enigmatically correlates with genome size. The CTD is crucial to eukaryotic transcription, yet the functional and evolutionary relevance of this variation remains unclear. Here, we use smFISH, live imaging, and RNA-seq to investigate how CTD length and disorder influence transcription. We find that length modulates the size and frequency of transcriptional bursting. Disorder is highly conserved and mediates CTD-CTD interactions, an ability we show is separable from protein sequence and necessary for efficient transcription. We build a data-driven quantitative model, simulations of which recapitulate experiments and support CTD length promotes initial polymerase recruitment to the promoter but slows down its release from it, and that CTD-CTD interactions enable promoter recruitment of multiple polymerases. Our results reveal how these tunable parameters provide access to a range of transcriptional activity, offering a new perspective for the mechanistic significance of CTD length and disorder in transcription across eukaryotes.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Single-molecule imaging reveals the interplay between transcription factors, nucleosomes, and transcriptional bursting

Transcription factors show rapid and reversible binding to chromatin in living cells, and transcription occurs in sporadic bursts, but how these phenomena are related is unknown. Using a combination of in vitro and in vivo single-molecule imaging approaches, we directly correlated binding of the transcription factor Gal4 with the transcriptional bursting kinetics of the Gal4 target genes GAL3 and GAL10 in living yeast cells. We find that Gal4 dwell times sets the transcriptional burst size. Gal4 dwell time depends on the affinity of the binding site and is reduced by orders of magnitude by nucleosomes. Using a novel imaging platform, we simultaneously tracked transcription factor binding and transcription at one locus, revealing the timing and correlation between Gal4 binding and transcription. Collectively, our data support a model where multiple polymerases initiate during a burst as long as the transcription factor is bound to DNA, and a burst terminates upon transcription factor dissociation.

molecular biology↗