bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Hennig, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Hennig, H..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Label-free assessment of red blood cell storage lesions by deep learning

Blood transfusion is a life-saving clinical procedure. With millions of units needed globally each year, it is a growing concern to improve product quality and recipient outcomes.\n\nStored red blood cells (RBCs) undergo continuous degradation, leading to structural and biochemical changes. To analyze RBC storage lesions, complex biochemical and biophysical assays are often employed.\n\nWe demonstrate that label-free imaging flow cytometry and deep learning can characterize RBC morphologies during 42-day storage, replacing the current practice of manually quantifying a blood smear from stored blood units. Based only on bright field and dark field images, our model achieved 90% accuracy in classifying six different RBC morphologies associated with storage lesions versus human-curated manual examination. A model fitted to the deep learning-extracted features revealed a pattern of morphological changes within the aging blood unit that allowed predicting the expiration date of stored blood using solely morphological assessment.\n\nDeep learning and label-free imaging flow cytometry could therefore be applied to reduce complex laboratory procedures and facilitate robust and objective characterization of blood samples.

bioinformatics

Revisiting the General Concept of Network Centralities: A Propose for Centrality Analysis in Network Science

BackgroundNumerous centrality measures have been introduced to identify \"central\" nodes in large networks. The availability of a wide range of measures for ranking influential nodes leaves the user to decide which measure may best suit the analysis of a given network. The choice of a suitable measure is furthermore complicated by the impact of the network topology on ranking influential nodes by centrality measures. To approach this problem systematically, we examined the centrality profile of nodes of yeast protein-protein interaction networks (PPINs) in order to detect which centrality measure is succeeding in predicting influential proteins. We studied how different topological network features are reflected in a large set of commonly used centrality measures.\n\nResultsWe used yeast PPINs to compare 27 common of centrality measures. The measures characterize and assort influential nodes of the networks. We applied principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering and found that the most informative measures depend on the networks topology. Interestingly, some measures had a high level of contribution in comparison to others in all PPINs, namely Latora closeness, Decay, Lin, Freeman closeness, Diffusion, Residual closeness and Average distance centralities.\n\nConclusionsThe choice of a suitable set of centrality measures is crucial for inferring important functional properties of a network. We concluded that undertaking data reduction using unsupervised machine learning methods helps to choose appropriate variables (centrality measures). Hence, we proposed identifying the contribution proportions of the centrality measures with PCA as a prerequisite step of network analysis before inferring functional consequences, e.g., essentiality of a node.

systems biology