Biology subjects

Hampe, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Hampe, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Insect herbivory and avian insectivory in novel native oak forests: divergent effects of stand size and connectivity

The value of novel native broadleaf woodlands for biodiversity conservation is important to consider for adequate forest management in rural landscapes. Passive reforestation has been proposed as a cost-efficient tool for creating networks of novel native forest stands that would help restoring biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. Yet to date the ecological functioning of such stands remains strongly understudied compared to forest remnants resulting from longer-term fragmentation. We assessed how the size and connectivity of newly established Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) stands in rural landscapes of SW France affect rates of herbivory by different insect guilds as well as rates of avian insectivory and the abundance and richness of insectivorous birds. Comparing 18 novel forest stands along a gradient of size (0.04-1.15 ha) and cover of broadleaf forests in the surroundings (0-30% within a 500 radius), we found that even the smallest stands are colonised by leaf miners and chewers/skeletonizers, and that rates of herbivory are globally comparable to those reported from older and larger oak forests. The size of stands had a relatively minor effect on herbivory, whereas it increased the abundance of insectivorous bird. It also determined rates of avian insectivory as estimated by an experiment with plasticine caterpillars. These rates were however rather low and unrelated with the extent of herbivory in the stand. Overall, our study indicates that insect herbivores tend to react more rapidly to the establishment of novel native forests than their avian predators as the latter may depend on the development of larger patches of suitable habitat in the surrounding landscape. To favour a rapid build-up of diverse, and hence stable, trophic networks involving insect herbivores and their predators, woodland creation schemes should therefore primarily focus on habitat size and quality.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

Drivers of individual oak tree selection by acorn dispersing animals inferred from a genotyped seedling cohort

Seed-dispersing animals can strongly influence plant reproductive success and resulting population structures. Few studies have disentangled different drivers of disperser foraging behavior in natural settings and their actual relevance for plant fitness. Here we adopt a novel approach to investigate the drivers of individual trees dispersal success in a mixed Pedunculate oak-Pyrenean oak (Quercus robur and Q. pyrenaica) forest stand. We genotyped a seedling cohort (n = 825) upon emergence and performed Bayesian parentage analyses to infer the acorn dispersal success of each oak tree in the stand. We then modeled this estimate as a function of six tree characteristics. The absolute number of animal-dispersed seedlings was exclusively predicted by crop size and the proportion of dispersed seedlings by the number of fruiting oaks in the neighborhood. Neither the oak species nor tree height, acorn size or shape played any role. Our findings contrast with results from experimental studies and suggest that effective acorn dispersers, despite being scatter-hoarders, behaved much like avian dispersers of fleshy-fruited species when selecting trees to forage on. Their behavior should favor the dominance of large, prolific trees for the dynamics and genetic composition of naturally regenerating oak stands.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

Asymmetry in marginal population performance foreshadows widespread species range shifts

AimRange shifts are expected to occur when populations at one range margin perform better than those at the other margin, yet no global trend in population performances at range margins has been demonstrated empirically across a wide range of taxa and biomes. Here we test the prediction that, if impacts of ongoing climate change on population performance are widespread, then populations from the high-latitude margin (HLM) should perform as well as or better than central populations, whereas populations at low-latitude margins (LLM) populations should perform worse. LocationGlobal Time period1898-2020 Major taxa studiedPlants and animals MethodsTo test our prediction, we used a meta-analysis quantifying the empirical support for asymmetry in the performance of high- and low-latitude margin populations compared to central populations. Performance estimates were derived from 51 papers involving 113 margin-centre comparisons from 54 species and 705 populations. We then related these performance differences to climatic differences among populations. We also tested whether patterns are consistent across taxonomic kingdoms (plants vs. animals) and across habitats (marine vs. terrestrial). ResultsPopulations at margins performed significantly worse than central populations and this trend was primarily driven by the low-latitude margin. Although the difference was of small magnitude, it was largely consistent across biological kingdoms and habitats. The differences in performance were positively related to the difference in average temperatures between populations during the period 1985-2016. Major conclusionsThe observed asymmetry in marginal population performance confirms predictions about the effects of global climate change. It indicates that changes in demographic rates in marginal populations, despite extensive short-term variation, can serve as early-warning signals of impending range shifts.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

Range-wide variation in local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity of fitness-related traits in Fagus sylvatica and their implications under climate change

AimTo better understand and more realistically predict future species distribution ranges, it is critical to account for local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity in populations responses to climate. This is challenging because local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity are trait-dependent and traits co-vary along climatic gradients, with differential consequences for fitness. Our aim is to quantify local adaptation and phenotypic plasticity of vertical and radial growth, leaf flushing and survival across Fagus sylvatica range and to estimate each trait contribution to explain the species occurrence.\n\nLocationEurope\n\nTime period1995 - 2014; 2070\n\nMajor taxa studiedFagus sylvatica L.\n\nMethodsWe used vertical and radial growth, flushing phenology and mortality of Fagus sylvatica L. recorded in BeechCOSTe52 (>150,000 trees). Firstly, we performed linear mixed-effect models that related trait variation and co-variation to local adaptation (related to the planted populations climatic origin) and phenotypic plasticity (accounting for the climate of the plantation), and we made spatial predictions under current and RCP 8.5 climates. Secondly, we combined spatial trait predictions in a linear model to explain the occurrence of the species.\n\nResultsThe contribution of plasticity to intra-specific trait variation is always higher than that of local adaptation, suggesting that the species is less sensitive to climate change than expected; different traits constrain beechs distribution in different parts of its range: the northernmost edge is mainly delimited by flushing phenology (mostly driven by photoperiod and temperature), the southern edge by mortality (mainly driven by intolerance to drought), and the eastern edge is characterised by decreasing radial growth (mainly shaped by precipitation-related variables in our model); considering trait co-variation improved single-trait predictions.\n\nMain conclusionsPopulation responses to climate across large geographical gradients are trait-dependent, indicating that multi-trait combinations are needed to understand species sensitivity to climate change and its variation across distribution ranges.

ecology↗