bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fufachev, I.

Publications and source records attributed to Fufachev, I..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Conserving bird populations in the Anthropocene: the significance of non-breeding movements

Advances in tracking technologies have revealed the diverse migration patterns of birds, which are critical for range mapping and population estimation. Population trends are usually estimated in breeding ranges where birds remain stationary, but for species that breed in remote areas like the Arctic, these trends are often assessed in over-wintering ranges. Evaluating population trends during the wintering season is challenging due to the extensive movements of birds in these ranges, which require a deep understanding of the movement dynamics. However, these movements remain understudied, particularly in the mid-latitudes, where many Arctic breeders overwinter, increasing uncertainty in their ranges and numbers. Here, we show that the Arctic breeding raptor Rough-legged buzzard, which overwinters in the mid-latitudes, has a specific wintering strategy. After migrating ca 1,500 km from the Arctic to mid-latitudes, the birds continue to move throughout the entire over-wintering period, covering an additional 1,000 km southwestward and then back northeastward as the snowline advances. This ongoing movement makes their wintering range dynamic over the course of the season. In essence, this movement represents an extension of the quick migration process, albeit at a slower pace, and we have termed this migration pattern foxtrot migration, drawing an analogy to the alternating fast and slow movements of the foxtrot dance. These results highlight the potential errors in range mapping from single mid-winter surveys and emphasize the importance of this migration pattern in assessing the conservation status of bird species. Understanding this migration pattern could help to correctly estimate bird populations in over-wintering ranges, which is especially important for species that nest in hard-to-reach regions such as the Arctic.

ecology↗

A versatile semiautomated image analysis workflow for time-lapsed camera trap image classification.

O_LICamera trap arrays can generate thousands to millions of images that require exorbitant time and effort to classify and annotate by trained observers. Computer vision has evolved as an automated alternative to manual classification. The most popular computer vision solution is the supervised Machine Learning technique, which uses labeled images to train automated classification algorithms. C_LIO_LIWe propose a multi-step semi-automated workflow that consists of (1) identifying and separating bad-from good-quality images, (2) parsing good images into animals, humans, vehicles, and empty, and (3) cropping animals from images and classifying them into species for manual inspection. We trained, validated, and evaluated this approach using 548,627 images from 46 cameras in two regions of the Arctic (northeastern Norway, and Yamal Peninsula, Russia). C_LIO_LIWe obtained an accuracy of 0.959 for all three steps combined with the complete year test data set at Varanger and 0.922 at Yamal, reducing the number of images that required manual inspection to 7.9% of the original set from Varanger and 3.2% from Yamal. C_LIO_LIResearchers can modify this multi-step process to meet their specific needs for monitoring and surveying wildlife, providing greater flexibility than current options available for image classification. C_LI

ecology↗