bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Fuchs, S. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Fuchs, S. M..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Defining the role of the polyasparagine repeat domain of the S. cerevisiae transcription factor Azf1p

Across eukaryotes, homopolymeric repeats of amino acids are enriched in regulatory proteins such as transcription factors and chromatin remodelers. These domains play important roles in signaling, binding, prion formation, and functional phase separation. Azf1p is a prion-forming yeast transcription factor that contains two homorepeat domains, a polyglutamine and a polyasparagine domain. In this work, we report a new phenotype for Azf1p and identify a large set of genes that are regulated by Azf1p during growth in glucose. We show that the polyasparagine (polyN) domain plays a subtle role in transcription but is dispensable for Azf1p localization and prion formation. Genes upregulated upon deletion of the polyN domain are enriched in functions related to carbon metabolism and storage. This domain may therefore be a useful target for engineering yeast strains for fermentation applications and small molecule production. We also report that both the polyasparagine and polyglutamine domains vary in length across strains of S. cerevisiae and propose a model for how this variation may impact protein function.

molecular biology↗

Variation in repeat copy number of epithelial adhesin 1 tandem repeat region leads to variable protein display through multiple mechanisms

The pathogenic yeast Candida glabrata is reliant on a suite of cell surface adhesins that play a variety of roles necessary for transmission, establishment, and proliferation during infection. One particular adhesin, Epithelial Adhesin 1 [Epa1p], is responsible for binding to host tissue, a process which is essential for fungal propagation. Epa1p structure consists of three domains: an N-terminal intercellular binding domain responsible for epithelial cell binding, a C-terminal GPI anchor for cell wall linkage, and a serine / threonine-rich linker domain connecting these terminal domains. The linker domain contains a 40-amino acid tandem repeat region, which we have found to be variable in repeat copy number between isolates from clinical sources. We hypothesized that natural variation in Epa1p repeat copy may modulate protein function. To test this, we recombinantly expressed Epa1p with various repeat copy numbers in S. cerevisiae to determine how differences in repeat copy number affect Epa1p expression, surface display, and binding to human epithelial cells. Our data suggest that repeat copy number variation has pleiotropic effects, influencing gene expression, protein surface display, shedding from the cell surface, and host tissue adhesion of the Epa1p adhesin. Understanding these links between repeat copy number variants and mechanisms of infection provide new understanding of the variety of roles of repetitive proteins contribute to pathogenicity of C. glabrata.

cell biology↗

Tandem repeats drive variation of intrinsically disordered regions in budding yeast

Copy-number variation in tandem repeat coding regions is more prevalent in eukaryotic genomes than current literature suggests. We have reexamined the genomes of nearly 100 yeast strains looking to map regions of repeat variation. From this analysis we have identified that length variation is highly correlated to intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). Furthermore, the majority of length variation is associated with tandem repeats. These repetitive regions are rich in homopolymeric amino acid sequences but nearly half of the variation comes from longer-repeating motifs. Comparisons of repeat copy number and sequence between strains of budding yeast as well as closely related fungi suggest selection for and conservation of IDR-related tandem repeats. In some instances, repeat variation has been demonstrated to mediate binding affinity, aggregation, and protein stability. With this analysis, we can identify proteins for which repeat variation may play conserved roles in modulating protein function.

molecular biology↗

Saccharomyces cerevisiae H2A copies differentially contribute to recombination and CAG/CTG repeat maintenance, with a role for H2A.1 threonine 126

DNA are sites of genomic instability. Long CAG/CTG repeats form hairpin structures, are fragile, and can expand during DNA repair. The chromatin response to DNA damage can influence repair fidelity, but the knowledge of chromatin modifications involved in maintaining repair fidelity within repetitive DNA is limited. In a screen for CAG repeat fragility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, histone 2A copy 1 (H2A.1) was identified to protect the repeat from increased rates of breakage. To address the role of H2A in CAG repeat instability, we tested the effect of deleting each histone H2 subytpe. Whereas deletion of HTA2, HTZ1, HTB1, and HTB2 did not significantly affect CAG repeat maintenance, deletion of HTA1 resulted in increased expansion frequency. Notably, mutation of threonine 126, unique to H2A.1, to a non-phosphorylatable alanine increased CAG repeat instability to a similar level as the hta1{Delta} mutant. CAG instability in the absence of HTA1 or mutation to hta1-T126A was dependent on the presence of the homologous recombination (HR) repair proteins Rad51, Rad52, and Rad57, and the Pol{delta} subunit Pol32. In addition, sister chromatid recombination (SCR) was suppressed in the hta1{Delta} and hta1-T126A mutants and this suppression was epistatic to pol32{Delta}. Finally, break-induced replication (BIR) is impaired in the hta1{Delta} mutant, resulting in an altered repair profile. These data reveal differential roles for the H2A subtypes in DNA repair and implicate a new role for H2A.1 threonine-126 phosphorylation in mediating fidelity during HR repair and promoting SCR. Using a fragile, repetive DNA element to model endogenous DNA damage, our results demonstrate that H2A.1 plays a greater role than H2A.2 in promoting homology-dependent repair, suggesting H2A.1 is the true homolog of mammalian H2AX, whereas H2A.2 is functionally equivalent to mammalian H2A.\n\nAuthor SummaryCAG/CTG trinuncleotide repeats are fragile sequences that when expanded can cause human disease. To evaluate the role of S. cerevisiae histone H2A copies in DNA repair, we have measured instability of an expanded CAG/CTG repeat tract and repair outcomes in H2A mutants. Although the two copies of H2A are nearly identical in amino acid sequence, we found that the CAG repeat is more unstable in the absence of H2A copy 1 (H2A.1) than H2A copy 2, and that this role appears to be partially dependent on a phosphorylatable threonine at residue 126 in the C-terminal tail of H2A.1. Further, we show through a series of genetic assays that H2A.1 plays a role in promoting homologous recombination events, including sister chromatid recombination and break-induced replication. Our results uncover a role for H2A.1 in mediating fidelity of repair within repetitive DNA, and demonstrate that modification of its unique Thr126 residue plays a role in regulating SCR. Given the dependence of HR repair on H2A.1 but not H2A.2, we conclude that H2A.1 plays a greater repair-specific role in the cell and therefore would be the true homolog of mammalian H2AX.

genetics↗

Repeat-specific functions for the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II in budding yeast

The C-terminal domain (CTD) of the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is required to regulate transcription and to integrate it with other essential cellular processes. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the CTD of Rpb1p consists of 26 conserved heptad repeats that are post-translationally modified to orchestrate protein factor binding at different stages of the transcription cycle. A long-standing question in the study of the CTD is if there are any functional differences between the 26 repeats. In this study, we present evidence that repeats of identical sequence have different functions based on their position within the CTD. We assembled plasmids expressing Rpb1p with serine to alanine substitutions in three defined regions of the CTD and measured a range of phenotypes for yeast expressing these constructs. Mutations in the beginning and middle regions of the CTD had drastic, and region-specific effects, while mutating the distal region had no observable phenotype. Further mutational analysis determined that Ser5 within the first region of repeats was solely responsible for the observed growth differences and sequencing fast-growing suppressors allowed us to further define the functional regions of the CTD. This mutational analysis is consistent with current structural models for how the RNAPII holoenzyme and the CTD specifically would reside in complex with Mediator and establishes a foundation for studying regioselective binding along the repetitive RNAPII CTD.

genetics↗