Biology subjects

Eichenberg, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Eichenberg, D..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

Automated assessments based on species distribution models can support regional Red Listing but need to be applied with caution: A case study from central Germany

AimExpert-based regional Red Lists (RL) carry conservation legislation globally. Yet, they are often difficult to reproduce and their regular compilation by a dwindling number of expert assessors burdens many regional conservation authorities. Here we batch-estimate RL indicators and extinction risk for >1,100 plant species and test the potential of this automated approach to support the expert-based RL process. LocationState of Hesse, Central Germany MethodsFirst, we estimated current population status, short-term population trend, long-term population trend, and extinction risk by binning existing occurrence probabilities modelled at three time slices with cut-off values derived from RL methodology. Subsequently we compared the results with the latest version of the Hessian expert-based RL using summary statistics and selected example species. ResultsWe find the assessments of extinction risk to agree in c. 60% of the cases, mostly for species not threatened with extinction. Existing mismatch was by one category in most cases, but up to 6 categories in some cases (mean: 1.6 categories). Furthermore, agreement was highest for extreme categories and very abundant species. Main conclusionsAutomated assessments were simplistic for many rare and taxonomically challenging species, but we considered them more accurate than the expert assessments for species with intermediate population size and for species of anthropogenic habitats. Furthermore, the automated assessments are particularly informative for the estimation of long-term and short-term population trends, for which experts are often left to guesstimate based on little data.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

Plant diversity stabilizes soil temperature

Extreme weather events are occurring more frequently, and research has shown that plant diversity can help mitigate impacts of climate change by increasing plant productivity and ecosystem stability1,2. Although soil temperature and its stability are key determinants of essential ecosystem processes related to water and nutrient uptake3 as well as soil respiration and microbial activity4, no study has yet investigated whether plant diversity can buffer soil temperature fluctuations. Using 18 years of a continuous dataset with a resolution of 1 minute ([~]795,312,000 individual measurements) from a large-scale grassland biodiversity experiment, we show that plant diversity buffers soil temperature throughout the year. Plant diversity helped to prevent soil heating in hot weather, and cooling in cold weather. Moreover, this effect of plant diversity increased over the 18-year observation period with the aging of experimental communities and was even stronger under extreme conditions, i.e., on hot days or in dry years. Using structural equation modelling, we found that plant diversity stabilized soil temperature by increasing soil organic carbon concentrations and, to a lesser extent, by increasing the plant leaf area index. We suggest that the diversity-induced stabilization of soil temperature may help to mitigate the negative effects of extreme climatic events such as soil carbon release, thus slow global warming.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Contrasting impacts of urban and farmland cover on flying insect biomass

Recent studies report declines in biomass, abundance and diversity of terrestrial insect groups. While anthropogenic land use is one likely contributor to this decline, studies assessing land cover as a driver of insect dynamics are rare and mostly restricted in spatial scale and types of land cover. In this study, we used rooftop-mounted car nets in a citizen science project ( InsectMobile) to allow for large-scale geographic sampling of flying insects across Denmark and parts of Germany. Citizen scientists sampled insects along 278 10 km routes in urban, farmland and semi-natural (grassland, wetland and forest) landscapes in the summer of 2018. We assessed the importance of local to landscape-scale effects and land use intensity by relating insect biomass to land cover in buffers of 50, 250, 500 and 1000 m along the routes. We found a negative association of urban cover and a positive association of farmland on insect biomass at a landscape-scale (1000 m buffer) in both countries. In Denmark, we also found positive effects of all semi-natural land covers, i.e. grassland (largest at the landscape-scale, 1000 m), forests (largest at intermediate scales, 250 m), and wetlands (largest at the local-scale, 50 m). The negative association of insect biomass with urban land cover and positive association with farmland were not clearly modified by any variable associated with land use intensity. Our results show that land cover has an impact on flying insect biomass with the magnitude of this effect varying across spatial scales. Since we consistently found negative effects of urban land cover, our findings highlight the need for the conservation of semi-natural areas, such as wetlands, grasslands and forests, in Europe.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Widespread decline in plant diversity across six decades

Based on plant occurrence data covering all parts of Germany, we investigated changes in the distribution of 2146 plant species between 1960 and 2017. We analyzed 29 million occurrence records over an area of [~]350.000 km2 on a 5 x 5 km grid using temporal and spatio-temporal models and accounting for sampling bias. Since the 1960s, more than 70% of investigated plant species showed significant declines in nation-wide occurrence. Archaeophytes (species introduced before 1492) most strongly declined but also native plant species experienced severe declines. In contrast, neophytes (species introduced after 1492) increased in their nation-wide occurrence but not homogeneously throughout the country. Our analysis suggests that the strongest declines in native species already happened in the 1960s-80s, a time frame in which usually few data exist. Increases in neophytic species were strongest in the 1990s and 2010s. Overall, the increase in neophytes did not compensate for the loss of other species, resulting in a decrease in mean grid-cell species-richness of -1.9% per decade. The decline in plant biodiversity is a widespread phenomenon occurring in different habitats and geographic regions. It is likely that this decline has major repercussions on ecosystem functioning and overall biodiversity, potentially with cascading effects across trophic levels. The approach used in this study is transferable to large-scale trend analyses using heterogeneous occurrence data.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Winners and losers over 35 years of dragonfly and damselfly distributional change in Germany

Recent studies suggest insect declines in parts of Europe; however, the generality of these trends across different taxa and regions remains unclear. Standardized data are not available to assess large-scale, long-term changes for most insect groups but opportunistic citizen science data is widespread for some taxa. We compiled over 1 million occurrence records of Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) from different regional databases across Germany. We used occupancy-detection models to estimate annual distributional changes between 1980 and 2016 for each species. We related species attributes to changes in the species distributions and inferred possible drivers of change. Species showing increases were generally warm-adapted species and/or running water species while species showing decreases were cold-adapted species using standing water habitats such as bogs. We developed a novel approach using time-series clustering to identify groups of species with similar patterns of temporal change. Using this method, we defined five typical patterns of change for Odonata - each associated with a specific combination of species attributes. Overall, trends in Odonata provide mixed news - improved water quality, coupled with positive impacts of climate change, could explain the positive trend status of many species. At the same time, declining species point to conservation challenges associated with habitat loss and degradation. Our study demonstrates the great value of citizen science data for assessing large-scale distributional change and conservation decision-making.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2017

Strong positive biodiversity-productivity relationships in a subtropical forest experiment

Forest ecosystems contribute substantially to global terrestrial primary productivity and climate regulation, but, in contrast to grasslands, experimental evidence for a positive biodiversity-productivity relationship in highly diverse forests is still lacking1. Here, we provide such evidence from a large forest biodiversity experiment with a novel design2 in subtropical China. Productivity (stand-level tree basal area, aboveground volume and carbon and their annual increment) increased linearly with the logarithm of tree species richness. Additive partitioning3 showed that increasing positive complementarity effects combined with weakening negative selection effects caused a strengthening of the relationship over time. In 2-species mixed stands, complementary effects increased with functional distance and selection effects with vertical crown dissimilarity between species. Understorey shrubs reduced stand-level tree productivity, but this effect of competition was attenuated by shrub species richness, indicating that a diverse understorey may facilitate overall ecosystem functioning. Identical biodiversity-productivity relationships were found in plots of different size, suggesting that extrapolation to larger scales is possible. Our results highlight the potential of multi-species afforestation strategies to simultaneously contribute to mitigation of climate change and biodiversity restoration.

ecology↗