Biology subjects

Dernovsek, M. Z.

Publications and source records attributed to Dernovsek, M. Z..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Cross-validation of technologies for genotyping CYP2D6 and CYP2C19

BackgroundCYP2D6 and CYP2C19 are cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the metabolism of many medications from multiple therapeutic classes. Associations between patterns of variants (known as haplotypes) in the genes encoding them (CYP2D6 and CYP2C19) and enzyme activities are well described. The genes in fact comprise 21% of biomarkers in drug labels. Despite this, genotyping is not common, partly attributable to its challenging nature (CYP2D6 having >100 haplotypes, including those with sequence from an adjacent pseudogene, and gene duplications). We cross-validated different methodologies for identifying haplotypes in these genes against each other. MethodsNinety-two samples with a variety of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes according to prior AmpliChip CYP450 and TaqMan CYP2C19*17 data were selected from the Genome-based therapeutic drugs for depression (GENDEP) study. Genotyping was performed with TaqMan copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis, the next generation sequencing-based Ion S5 AmpliSeq Pharmacogenomics Panel, PharmacoScan, long-range polymerase chain reaction (L-PCR) followed by amplicon analysis, and Agena for CYP2C19. Variant pattern to haplotype translation was automated. ResultsThe inter-platform concordance for CYP2C19 was high (up to 100% for available data). For CYP2D6, the IonS5-PharmacoScan concordance was 94% for a range of variants tested apart from those with at least one extra copy of a CYP2D6 gene (occurring at a frequency of 3.8%, 33/853), or those with substantial sequence derived from pseudogene, known as hybrids (3%, 26/853). ConclusionsInter-platform concordance for CYP2C19 was high, and, moreover, the Ion S5 and PharmacoScan data were 100% concordant with that from a TaqMan CYP2C19*2 assay. We have also demonstrated feasibility of using an NGS platform for genotyping CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, with automated data interpretation methodology. This points the way to a method of making CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotyping more readily accessible.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Assessing 42 inflammatory markers in 321 control subjects and 887 major depressive disorder cases: BMI and other confounders and overall predictive ability for current depression

Inflammatory markers such as cytokines represent potential biomarkers for major depressive disorder (MDD). Many, generally small studies have examined the role of single markers and found significant associations. We assessed 42 inflammatory markers, namely cytokines, in the blood of 321 control subjects and 887 MDD cases. We tested whether individual inflammatory marker levels were significantly affected by MDD case/control status, current episode, or current depression severity, co-varying for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking, current antidepressant use, ethnicity, assay batch and study effects. We further used machine learning algorithms to investigate if we could use our data to blindly discriminate MDD patients, or those in a current episode. We found broad and powerful influences of confounding factors on log-protein levels. Notably, IL-6 levels were very strongly influenced by BMI (p = 1.37 x 10-43, variance explained = 18%), while Interleukin-16 was the most significant predictor of current depressive episode (p = 0.003, variance explained = 0.9%, q < 0.1). No single inflammatory marker predicted MDD case/control status when a subject was not in a depressed episode, nor did any predict depression severity. Machine learning results revealed that using inflammatory marker data with clinical confounder information significantly increased precision for differentiating MDD patients who were in an episode. To conclude, a wide panel of inflammatory markers alongside clinical information may aid in predicting the onset of symptoms, but no single inflammatory protein is likely to represent a clinically useful biomarker for MDD diagnosis or prognosis. We note that the potential influence of physical health related and population stratification related confounders on inflammatory biomarker studies in psychiatry is considerable.

neuroscience↗