Biology subjects

Alpert, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Alpert, G..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Asymmetric increase in episodic and procedural memory interference in older adults

In younger adults, newly formed procedural memories are weakened by the subsequent formation of episodic memories (E[->]P interference) and vice versa (P[->]E interference; "cross-memory interference"). Older adults experience significant decline in episodic memory but maintain relatively intact procedural memory. This asymmetric decline in memory may also cause an asymmetric change in cross-memory interference compared to younger adults. For example, older adults may experience a significant increase in one type of cross-memory interference while leaving the other unchanged. Additionally, decline in episodic memory may cause E[->]P interference to either increase or decrease depending on how the episodic and procedural memory systems interact. However, no study to our knowledge has compared cross-memory interference between younger and older adults. We investigated cross-memory interference in younger and older adults by measuring E[->]P (Exp. 1) and P[->]E (Exp. 2) interference in 40 younger (18-40 years old) and 40 older ([≥] 55 years old) adults. Compared to younger adults, the results show that older adults experience significantly stronger E[->]P interference while P[->]E interference was statistically indistinguishable between groups. These results confirm that older adults experience an asymmetric increase in cross-memory interference and suggest that the increase in E[->]P interference is related to the asymmetric decline in episodic memory relative to procedural memory.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Failure to reproduce the effect of procedural memory interference on wakeful consolidation of episodic memory in younger and older adults

Brown and Robertson (2007) revealed that skill learning interferes with the wakeful consolidation of episodic memories in young adults. This finding is commonly used as evidence that episodic and procedural memories should not be learned in close temporal proximity but has not been reproduced by an independent laboratory. Additionally, older adults experience episodic memory deficits, but it is unknown whether this group is also vulnerable to this type of interference. We aimed to reproduce Brown and Robertsons (2007) finding in younger adults, while also comparing the magnitude of interference between younger and older adults. Forty younger (18-40 years; n =20) and older adults ([≥]55 years; n = 20) visited the laboratory in the morning and acquired episodic memories (a list of words) immediately before a procedural finger-tapping (procedural) task. Half of all participants were exposed to a learnable sequential structure. In the afternoon of the same day, participants were asked to recall the episodic memories from the morning session. We found weak evidence of interference for both age groups and no statistical difference in interference between groups. Our results suggest that the interfering effects of these memory types may be negligible or overestimated, and that these memory types can be acquired together without interference.

neuroscience↗