bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.11.09.765311

The Where and When of Tracking Sound Sources Head-based auditory motion tracking integrates velocity and spatial error within a common delayed frame

Oess, T.·Iriventi, S. K.·Ernst, M. O.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Auditory objects in everyday environments remain seldomly at the same position but move about in the environment and keeping track of their motion is an essential task for the auditory system to maintain a correct representation of auditory space/scene. Following such a moving sound source in two-dimensional space requires the nervous system to guide head movements using delayed and uncertain sensory information. How the auditory system integrates such information for combined horizontal and vertical movements is still debated. 116 117 We recorded head movements from 14 participants tracking a physically moving loudspeaker along unpredictable two-dimensional trajectories. Participants followed source motion with substantial delays and retained measurable spatial discrepancies. To explain these behaviours, we developed a hybrid model combining source velocity with the spatial discrepancy between source and head at the matched, delayed time points. The model predicts head velocity on previously unseen trajectories more accurately than formulations relying on either signal alone. Importantly, using preceding rather than current head orientation improved prediction, highlighting the importance of temporal correspondence between sensory and motor states. These findings suggest that head-based auditory motion tracking depends on complementary motion and spatial information represented within a common delayed reference frame.

Explore related subjects

animal behavior and cognitionPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Oess, T., Iriventi, S. K., Ernst, M. O.. 2026-11-10. The Where and When of Tracking Sound Sources Head-based auditory motion tracking integrates velocity and spatial error within a common delayed frame. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.09.765311

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Deconstructing Boldness: Latent behavioural structure across novelty, predation, and exploration in an endangered species translocation program

Risk-related behaviours including neophobia, exploration, and predator avoidance are often assumed to covary along a general boldness axis. Although some translocation studies have linked one or more of these behaviours with fitness, it is possible that the underlying behavioural structure varies under different selective environments. Conservation breeding programs provide a unique opportunity to evaluate the structure of behavioural correlations in a non-domestic species under artificial conditions. We tested whether risk-related behaviours represent a unified boldness syndrome in a captive population of the endangered Attwaters prairie chicken (APC; Tympanuchus cupido attwateri). We quantified the repeatable behaviours of 257 juveniles and compared 11 models of behavioural covariation structure using multivariate mixed models and confirmatory factor analysis. There was no support for a single risk-taking axis; instead, we found three dimensions representing responses to novelty and environmental stimuli (Engagement), predator avoidance (Threat Response), and maze exploration (Maze Progression). Our results indicate that these risk-related behaviours are not organized along a single axis in captive APCs, challenging assumptions that risk-taking represents a universal behavioural syndrome. To anticipate post-release success accurately, conservation managers should understand the exact behavioural architecture of the captive population rather than assume that the classical bold-shy structure occurs in all contexts.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Shared brain transcriptome signatures of social evolution and plasticity in shell-dwelling cichlid fishes

Inter-individual variability in phenotypic traits is widespread in nature both across and within species, with similar patterns of variation often occurring between and within species. Given that these two types of variation are generated by evolutionary and plasticity processes respectively, it raises the question to what extent the causal mechanisms underlying such variability at these two different levels are shared or not. To address this question, we studied the variation in brain transcriptomes in Tanganyikan cichlids that exhibit both intra- and interspecific variation in social behavior. We compared two facultatively social cichlid species, each containing naturally occurring solitary and social-living individuals, with a closely related obligatory solitary resembling the ancestral state. Differential gene expression and Gene Set Enrichment Analyses were performed in the telencephalon and diencephalon transcriptomes to investigate the molecular basis of both behavioral plasticity and the evolution of sociality. Behavioral plasticity involved few differentially expressed genes but extensive changes in biological pathways, supporting a highly polygenic architecture of social behavior. Across both species, social-living individuals consistently upregulated pathways involved in translation, protein homeostasis, and energy metabolism, whereas solitary individuals showed enrichment of neuronal morphogenesis, cell adhesion, and structural plasticity. Remarkably, these same functional programs were associated with the independent evolution of sociality, revealing a strong overlap between evolutionary and plastic transcriptional responses. This convergence was largely restricted to the telencephalon, while the diencephalon showed limited and inconsistent functional signatures. Together, our results support the repeated recruitment of gene regulatory programs during the evolution of sociality and demonstrate that behavioral plasticity and evolutionary transitions share common neurogenomic responses, consistent with a conserved genetic toolkit for social behavior.

animal behavior and cognition↗
bioRxiv2026

Inductive bias anchors a scaling law for biological learning

The speed of animal learning varies substantially across individuals and task domains, and does not always track intuitive notions of task complexity. A nominally simple binary decision task can take thousands of rewards to reach proficiency, whereas seemingly complex naturalistic tasks can be learned within dozens. A long-standing explanation is that learning speed reflects the alignment between an animal's inductive biases and the task at hand. However, without a precise notion of alignment, it is difficult to translate this idea into quantitative predictions. Here, modeling an animal as a Bayesian learner that improves through iterative reward feedback, we use statistical learning theory to derive a scaling law for biological learning. The law makes two predictions. First, inductive bias multiplicatively sets the speed of learning through a single quantity, the effective complexity. This quantity measures how well the task aligns with the animal's prior, and corresponds to the number of bits required to represent the task solution under that prior. We demonstrate this multiplicative scaling in a human motor learning dataset, where behavioral measurements before learning can precisely predict subsequent learning speed. Second, task performance improves as a power law in experience. We validate this power law in a large-scale mouse learning dataset and show that a two-parameter rescaling collapses individual learning curves onto a universal function predicted by the theory. These results suggest that behavioral measurements before learning can be used to predict task-dependent learning speeds, and they explain why learning speed reflects alignment with prior knowledge rather than nominal task complexity.

animal behavior and cognition↗