bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.11.04.764359

stem.MAP: Identification of cell-type-specific protein complexes in mammalian embryonic stem cells.

Rajaraman, A.·Fischer, S. N.·Woodcock-Girard, M. D.·Garge, R. K.·Drew, K.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Protein complexes carry out critical functions during development. Mapping cell-type-specific protein complexes in early embryogenesis is essential for uncovering the molecular mechanisms of embryonic development. We unfortunately currently lack a catalog of protein complexes specific for embryogenesis including embryonic stem cells. Here we develop a proteomics-based machine learning workflow to predict protein complexes present in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC). Our method integrates data from a cell-type agnostic protein complex resource with co-fractionation mass spectrometry (CF-MS) experiments on mESC. Our resource, stem.MAP, identifies 3,986 complexes encompassing ~133,000 unique interactions, and 8,616 proteins. stem.MAP captures variant complexes critical for stem cell function including the PRC2, BAF and NuRD complexes. stem.MAP also discriminates mutually exclusive interactions specific to embryonic stem cells (e.g. Eif4ebp2 - Eif4e). Finally we observe 1,388 high confidence stem.MAP interactions found only in mESC CF-MS data, many with support from AlphaFold modeling and a gastruloid coregulation network. We make stem.MAP protein complexes available through our web resource: stem.proteincomplexes.org. We anticipate stem.MAP will be beneficial to the study of early development and we expect our proteomics-based machine learning workflow to be applicable to the creation of any context-specific protein interaction network.

Explore related subjects

systems biologyPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rajaraman, A., Fischer, S. N., Woodcock-Girard, M. D., Garge, R. K., Drew, K.. 2026-11-06. stem.MAP: Identification of cell-type-specific protein complexes in mammalian embryonic stem cells.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.04.764359

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

A three-factor model can explain symmetry breaking and the n-1 rule during X-chromosome inactivation

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is a mammalian gene regulatory process that via chromosome-scale transcriptional silencing, leaves active a single X chromosome per diploid genome complement. The mechanisms that enable cells to select the appropriate number of X chromosomes to inactivate while leaving others active remain unclear. We demonstrate that all known chromosomal counting scenarios during XCI can be accounted for by a three-factor mathematical model that includes (1) Xist, the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) responsible for gene silencing during XCI in eutherians, (2) an X-linked transcriptional activator of Xist, and (3) the autosomally-encoded SPEN, an Xist RNA-binding protein that is essential for gene silencing during XCI. In our model, symmetry between active X chromosomes is broken by stochastic differences in the number of Xist molecules that associate with the X chromosomes at the onset of XCI. Subsequently, integrated positive and negative feedback loops amplify then propagate superstoichiometric assemblies of SPEN complexed with Xist on the inactive chromosome(s), and select for levels of X-linked activator that enable only one X chromosome per diploid genome complement to remain active. Thus, asymmetric propagation of the SPEN-Xist ribonucleoprotein complex may play an essential role in symmetry breaking and chromosomal counting during XCI, independently of or in concert with cis-acting networks of DNA regulatory elements. Our results also have conceptual implications for gene regulatory circuits on autosomes.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Gene regulatory architecture in antibiotic resistance is optimized for specific dynamic regimens

Cellular responses to antibiotics face a fundamental trade-off: resistance must be deployed quickly enough to prevent the accumulation of drug inside the cell, but expression of resistance genes is costly in the absence of the drug. Therefore, antibiotic responses are typically regulated, controlling not only whether resistance is expressed, but also when, how strongly, and for how long. These regulatory strategies are implemented through the strength and arrangement of promoters and operators. However, it is still not clear how the dynamics of drug exposure select for specific regulatory strategies. Here, we develop a dynamical model of a typical antibiotic response, where a transcriptional repressor senses the drug and regulates expression of a resistance protein, coupled to the effects of the drug on cell growth and gene expression. We define a cost function that weighs the different burdens imposed on the cell over the course of the response, and perform in silico optimization of the regulatory parameters under different selective pressures for three architectures of increasing complexity: constitutive expression of resistance, repression by a constitutively expressed repressor, and repression by a self-regulated repressor. We find that strong drug exposures favor constitutive expression of resistance, high costs of basal expression favor repression by a constitutive repressor, and self-regulation of the repressor is favored only when the response must provide protection while also restraining overexpression of resistance. Stochastic simulations further show that self-regulation of the repressor protects cells against fluctuations in repressor levels, which cause unnecessary induction of resistance before exposure and failed induction after exposure. This framework links the dynamics of the environment to the evolution of gene regulation, providing a basis to predict which regulatory strategies are expected to arise under specific selective pressures.

systems biology↗
bioRxiv2026

Photographic age gap is associated with frailty and predicts survival in laboratory mice

Ageing studies in mice need biomarkers that are cheap, non-invasive and repeatable. We asked how much of a mouse's age can be read from an ordinary photograph, and whether the part that cannot be explained by age carries biological information. We assembled 2,846 photographs of 1,292 mice (four strains, 1 to 34 months old) from seven facilities and predicted age with a frozen self-supervised vision model (DINOv2) and a ridge regression, always tested on facilities the model had never seen. Absolute age transferred poorly between facilities (median absolute error 138 days), because each facility's photographs carried an offset. Relative age transferred well: among mice photographed in the same session, the older mouse was predicted older in 65% of pairs, rising above 95% for age differences over 500 days, and the later photograph of the same mouse was predicted older in 63% of repeat pairs. Sex, in comparison, was inferred more reliably (87%). Mice predicted older than their age were frailer (+0.12 SD per 100 days) and had shorter survival (hazard ratio 1.14 per 100 days), and fourth generation (G4) telomerase-deficient mice looked 151 days older than their wild-type controls. Routine photographs therefore carry a real biological age signal that can be read at no extra cost, best used to compare mice photographed together.

systems biology↗