Speed judgments during smooth pursuit reflect low gain efference copy

Abstract

During smooth pursuit eye movements, the visual system must compensate for self-generated retinal motion to achieve stable perception of motion in the environment. This compensation primarily depends on an efferent copy of motor commands. Systematically under- or overweighting the strength of efference copy should lead to correlations between eye movement velocity and perceived object velocity. However, previous examinations of these trial-by-trial perceptual correlations have produced mixed results. It remains unclear how effectively the brain compensates for eye movement induced retinal motion during pursuit, and what this reveals about the way efference copy influences perception. To address this, we developed a speed perturbation paradigm in which 29 participants tracked a moving target that underwent brief speed changes. On each trial, we recorded eye velocity along with perceptual judgments of the sign of the speed change (faster or slower) and confidence ratings for those judgments. Across participants, perceptual and oculomotor sensitivity were correlated (r =0.53), but trial-by-trial perceptual and oculomotor responses appeared independent. A logistic regression model incorporating efference copy gain to predict perceptual reports from stimulus speed and eye speed revealed systematic under-compensation for eye movements; faster eye movements were associated with lower changes in perceived speed. Confidence ratings were well-calibrated to perceptual accuracy and showed a consistent negative relationship with eye movement speed. Collectively, these results are consistent with systematic under compensation for eye movements through the use of efference copy during motion perception.