Rate dependent Effects of AMPH on attentional processes as measured by 5C-CPT task

Abstract

Background: ADHD is characterized by inattention and impulsivity. Stimulants such as amphetamine are the first line treatments for ADHD. Amphetamine (AMPH) works by increasing extracellular levels of dopamine and noradrenaline. Such stimulants are used to test predictive validity of animal tasks, where it has been reported that amphetamine improves rat 5-CSRTT accuracy when the session length is increased to 250 trials. This improvement in accuracy was observed later in the session as control performance declined. Proving that amphetamine can improve 5C-CPT task performance adds to the predictive validity of the task. No previous works has demonstrated the pro-attentional effects of amphetamine on sustained attention in rat 5C-CPT. We have previously shown that pharmacological manipulations of dopaminergic system improve waiting impulsivity in a rate dependent manner and the importance of analysing the data using Oldham method. The present study extends this work to investigate the effect of amphetamine on attentional processes. Objective: to investigate effects of amphetamine on attentional processes as measured by 5C-CPT task using correlational analysis and group performance. Methods: Trained female Lister hooded rats were tested with AMPH (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mg/kg) under reduced stimulus duration schedule (0.25,0.5,1,1.5 and 2s SD) over normal length session (120 trials). Correlational analysis (Oldham method) was used to understand the relationship between baseline performance measures and the change following administration of AMPH. Results: The highest dose of AMPH impaired attentional performance in the 5C-CPT under reduced SD challenge (0.5s,1s,1.5s and 2s). This impairment was due to increase in FAR. Previous studies in 5-CSRTT suggest that reducing the SD increases attentional demand in the form of reducing accuracy without affecting waiting impulsivity. However, the 5-CSRTT does not include non-target trials, therefore, it cannot be used to measure sustained attention (SI) and responsivity index. The 5C-CPT requires greater attentional resources than the 5-CSRTT.This study is the first to report that reducing the SD changes responsivity index (bias) rather than measures of sustained attention (sensitivity index) in the 5C-CPT. Control sensitivity index did not change until the SD was reduced to less than 0.5s and this change was due to a change in baseline responsivity index (bias). Performance under each reduced SD revealed that the highest dose of AMPH (0.4 mg/kg) showed a tendency toward reducing sensitivity index at 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5s SDs. Under 1.0s SD, the highest dose of AMPH changed sustained attention (SI, HR and FAR) and omission in a rate-dependent manner without changing responsivity index. Performance across the session revealed that the impairment in sustained attention was observed at the beginning of the session. In the third trial block, Oldham method revealed an inverse relationship between baseline accuracy and the change following administration of 0.2 mg/kg AMPH, indicative of a rate-dependent effect. Conclusions: This study successfully demonstrates rate-dependent effects of AMPH on measures of attentional performance in the 5C-CPT. This experiment also demonstrates that responsivity index is sensitive to reduced SD challenge. To our knowledge this is the first study to report the presence of a direct relationship between baseline sustained attention and magnitude of improvement following administration of 0.4 mg/kg AMPH and an inverse relationship between baseline accuracy and the change following administration of 0.2 mg/kg AMPH in 5C-CPT task. Future studies should test lower doses of amphetamine (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) over extended session length (250 trials) to reveal the pro-attentional effects of this drug on 5C-CPT performance measures.