bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.09.15.751870

GO-Term Enrichment of Proteome-Scale Docking Profiles as a Biological Search-Space Reduction Layer for Protein Target Discovery

Harms, C. M.·Klein-Seetharaman, J.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Identifying protein targets from phenotype-first or mechanism-uncertain compounds remains difficult because proteome-scale docking can generate thousands of structurally plausible interactions per compound. We developed a workflow that converts ranked proteome-scale docking profiles into stable Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process enrichment signatures and evaluates whether those signatures can reduce the candidate target space while preferentially retaining known drug-target relationships. Docking targets were retained at the PDB-chain level, mapped to unique human gene identities, and analyzed with PANTHER overrepresentation against the screened structural gene universe. GO enrichment was evaluated from the top 25 through 505 ranked proteins in increments of 10, and a stable compound-level GO profile was selected using a Jaccard stability threshold of 0.80 across three consecutive transitions. Benchmarking used Yamanishi drug-target interactions, with 682 mapped compounds assigned to a prespecified development/held-out split (552/130) and evaluated at canonical, mechanistic, and fine-mechanistic biological resolutions. In the full corrected benchmark, 642 compounds with usable canonical GO profiles showed greater within-class than between-class similarity (0.1019 versus 0.0931; delta = 0.0088; 100,000-permutation p = 0.00222), and canonical class explained 1.34% of multivariate GO-profile variation by PERMANOVA (p < 1e-4). Fine-mechanistic labels showed stronger organization in the full dataset (delta = 0.0245; PERMANOVA R-squared = 0.0976; both p < 1e-4). Held-out validation was more modest and metric-dependent: mechanistic labels were significant by PERMANOVA (R-squared = 0.0626, p = 0.0437), whereas the frozen fine-mechanistic analysis showed greater within-class similarity (0.1350 versus 0.1110; p = 0.038) and significant nearest-neighbor recovery (p = 0.0495), but not significant PERMANOVA (p = 0.119). The principal held-out search-space experiment evaluated 107 compounds, 753,492 candidate protein rows, and 424 represented gold-standard targets. A direct GO gate retained 1.26% of candidates while retaining 11.32% of known targets (8.96-fold enrichment); ontology-propagated GO associations retained 5.10% of candidates and 21.46% of known targets (4.21-fold enrichment). At matched candidate-space sizes, GO-associated prioritization retained 27.59% versus 22.41% of known targets at approximately 5% of candidates, 39.39% versus 36.08% at 10%, and 58.73% versus 56.13% at 20%. By contrast, additive protein-level GO reranking was heterogeneous: among 605 evaluable compounds, 21.7% improved their best known-target rank, but mean reciprocal rank decreased from 0.0276 to 0.0189. These results support GO enrichment as an intermediate biological search-space reduction and prioritization layer rather than a universal direct target-scoring function. Keywords: proteome-scale docking; Gene Ontology; target discovery; targetome; PANTHER; target fishing; biological filtering; search-space reduction; Yamanishi benchmark

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Harms, C. M., Klein-Seetharaman, J.. 2026-09-22. GO-Term Enrichment of Proteome-Scale Docking Profiles as a Biological Search-Space Reduction Layer for Protein Target Discovery. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.09.15.751870

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

Inferring cascade drivers of VEXAS syndrome by a causal machine learning tool CauNagi

VEXAS syndrome is an adult-onset severe autoinflammatory disease caused by somatic mutations in UBA1, yet the cascade mechanisms linking primitive hematopoietic abnormalities to mature myeloid dysfunctions remain largely unknown. Identifying master regulators of a progressive disease, a black-box process, from complex transcriptomic data also remains challenging. To address this challenge, we developed CauNagi, a computational framework for prioritizing cascade candidate regulators (CCRs). CauNagi integrates a causal representation learning module derived from CausCell with an iterative deep learning backbone adapted from UNAGI; in addition, CauNagi extends these two components with a unique downstream module for CCRs analysis designed to characterize regulatory propagation across hierarchical cellular states. Mechanistically, CauNagi iteratively integrates causal disentangled representation learning with (1) disease-stage cell-state trajectory reconstruction and (2) dynamic regulatory analysis. Benchmarking on single-cell transcriptomic datasets showed that CauNagi preserved cell-type structure in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and enriched known acute myeloid leukemia(AML)-associated genes among its top-ranked global regulators. When applied to VEXAS syndrome, CauNagi readily revealed inflammatory responses, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and myeloid bias, consistent with the disease features. Furthermore, the CCRs analysis module of CauNagi assisted us in identifying 36 causal drivers, with SPI1, NFKB1, STAT3, and FOS prioritized as high-confidence regulatory hubs linking aberrant myeloid differentiation and inflammatory programs. These findings were further supported by an independent single-cell transcriptomic dataset from a murine VEXAS model. Overall, CauNagi provides a computationally efficient and systematic framework for identifying candidate causal regulators. Beyond hematopoietic diseases, CauNagi may also be applicable to other progressive disorders for which multistage single-cell transcriptomic datasets are available. CauNagi is available at https://github.com/steamed-stuffed-bun/CauNagi.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Inferential boundaries of age prediction: why prediction does not establish biological age measurement

Chronological-age clocks reconstruct age from biological measurements, yet their outputs are interpreted as biological age, gaps as ageing acceleration and intervention-associated decreases as rejuvenation. We show that age supervision identifies an age-task statistic, not a biological-age construct, and establish how this distinction changes biomarker construction and validation. Even at the population optimum, the same observable distribution and age-prediction performance admit incompatible biological-age interpretations. Resolving this ambiguity requires assumptions or evidence beyond the age task. Squared-error age loss penalizes within-age output dispersion without defining its biological direction. Given age and background, a gap re-expresses the compressed score; exact age recovery eliminates it even when heterogeneity remains in the measurements. Shared biological covariance permits genuine prognostic value without establishing construct identity. After allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, recipient-blood scores showed excess donor-lineage affiliation under a score-pairing null. In NHANES, age-trained scores improved held-out five-year mortality prediction beyond age and background, yet direct modelling of source measurements and mortality supervision at matched scalar capacity yielded further gains. The intended biological object must therefore guide study design, measurement selection and representation; validation must establish the claimed measurement relation rather than rely on age-prediction success alone.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

DisenTE: Sparse Pattern-Context Modeling for Interpretable Translation-Efficiency Matrix Completion

Partially observed object-by-context matrices arise across data-rich science, where dominant object effects can obscure smaller but informative context-dependent variation. We study this problem in a translation-efficiency atlas of 9,494 5' UTRs across 78 cellular and tissue contexts. We present DisenTE, a sequence-conditioned neural model that combines separate sequence and context branches with a sparse low-rank pattern-context channel. Each module pairs a sequence-derived activation with context-specific deployment weights, forming a dictionary whose sequence and context components can be examined separately. Under five-fold within-panel entry masking, DisenTE achieves a UTR-centered residual Spearman correlation of 0.641 +/- 0.005, compared with 0.304 +/- 0.003 for the strongest reference model. The learned dictionary retains 11 of 20 candidate modules. CTM 6 has the largest overlap with an external TOP set and a cap-proximal pyrimidine pattern; CTMs 5 and 7 also overlap the set but have purine-containing consensuses. The evidence supports CTM 6 as a TOP sequence anchor and CTMs 5 and 7 as TOP-set-associated factors. On this dataset, DisenTE improves completion over the evaluated references and provides module-level summaries of its fitted context-dependent variation.

bioinformatics↗