bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.08.19.745843

Classifying CRISPR-Cas9 Off-Target Cleavage Sites from GUIDE-seq Data: A Class-Imbalanced Machine Learning Benchmark

Abstract

Off-target cleavage is a central safety concern for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, particularly in therapeutic applications where unintended double-strand breaks carry clinical risk. We benchmarked five machine learning classifiers: logistic regression on mismatch-count summary features, a random forest and a gradient boosting model on one-hot-encoded sgRNA/candidate-site sequence pairs, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) over the positional mismatch map, and a gradient-boosting/CNN ensemble: on a real, published GUIDE-seq off-target dataset (Kleinstiver et al., 2016, Nature) comprising 95,829 candidate off-target sites for five sgRNAs, of which only 54 (0.06%) were experimentally validated as true cleavage sites. On a held-out, stratified test split (n = 19,166; 11 true positives), gradient boosting on combined mismatch and sequence features performed best (ROC-AUC = 0.997, PR-AUC = 0.355, best F1 = 0.50), outperforming a random forest on raw sequence encoding alone (PR-AUC = 0.083) and a sequence CNN (PR-AUC = 0.129). Because the positive class is extremely rare, we report precision-recall AUC as the primary metric rather than ROC-AUC, which is inflated by the large negative class. A positional mismatch analysis showed that experimentally validated off-target sites carried substantially fewer mismatches overall than non-cleaved candidate sites (mean 3.6 vs. 5.9 mismatches across the 23-nucleotide target), and were markedly more mismatch-intolerant in the 10-nucleotide PAM-proximal seed region (11.3% vs. 27.4% per-position mismatch rate) and at the PAM itself (6.8% vs. 16.0%), consistent with established seed-region and PAM-sensitivity models of Cas9 target recognition. We report these findings, including the low absolute precision achievable in this severely imbalanced, small-positive-class setting, as a realistic picture of what off-target classifiers can and cannot yet deliver from sequence alone.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sarvi, D., Alasyam, J.. 2026-08-23. Classifying CRISPR-Cas9 Off-Target Cleavage Sites from GUIDE-seq Data: A Class-Imbalanced Machine Learning Benchmark. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.08.19.745843

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Generation of a transgenic cephalopod

Coleoid cephalopods (cuttlefish, octopus, and squid) are marine mollusks with elaborate nervous systems that support a diverse repertoire of complex behaviors. These include the neural control of the color, pattern, and texture of the skin, facilitating both adaptive camouflage and innate patterning that may reflect internal state. The development of transgenic cephalopods expressing fluorescent proteins, optogenetic actuators, and reporters of neural activity would contribute a new and important technology to cephalopod biology. The generation of transgenic cephalopods, however, has remained a major challenge. Here, we report the development of stable transgenic dwarf cuttlefish (Ascarosepion bandense) expressing ubiquitous nuclear-localized mScarlet, a red fluorescent protein. We evaluated multiple strategies for transgenesis, and established cuttlefish lines using both CRISPR and the transposons Sleeping Beauty and Minos. The stable expression of transgenes enabled live imaging of cell dynamics during embryonic development. The Minos transposon emerged as the most efficient transgenesis strategy and is adaptable to promoters and transgenes of choice. These strategies now enable the generation of diverse genetic tools for mechanistic studies of cephalopod biology.

genetics↗

Large language model-based bibliometric evaluation of population descriptors in human genetics

As the use of population descriptors such as race, ethnicity, and ancestry have become increasingly common in modern genetics research, there have been growing calls to critically examine their use. Most notably, in 2023, the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a report titled Using Population Descriptors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A New Framework for an Evolving Field, which included eight specific and actionable recommendations for researchers to implement the ethical and accurate use of population descriptors in genetic research. Here, we use the 2023 NASEM report as a benchmark to analyze the use of population descriptors in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We develop a general toolkit for large language model-based bibliometrics, operationalize the report's recommendations into an evaluation framework, and apply this framework to evaluate all 4,007 papers from the GWAS Catalog published between 2007 and 2025 with full text available on PubMedCentral. We find significant improvements in adherence to NASEM report recommendations over time. However, most improvements predate the publication of the NASEM report itself, suggesting the report functioned primarily as a synthesis of existing best practices rather than a catalyst for change. We conclude by highlighting opportunities for growth in the field of human genetics.

genetics↗

Mitigating biases of rescaling in forward-in-time population genetic simulations

Forward-in-time population genetic simulations are widely used in evolutionary analyses, but simulating large populations and long genomic regions remains computationally demanding. To reduce this cost, parameter rescaling is widely employed, in which the original evolutionary process is approximated by one with a smaller population size and fewer generations. Recently, several studies using the SLiM simulator have raised concerns about the accuracy of this rescaling approach. In this study, we show that many of the biases reported in these studies can be mitigated by using a different simulation algorithm. These results reveal that the accuracy of parameter rescaling depends on how well the simulation algorithm preserves diffusion-limit properties under rescaling.

genetics↗