PAMalytics: a no-code application for structured validation of bioacoustic detections

Abstract

1. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is increasingly used for ecological research, biodiversity monitoring, assessment, and reporting. Automated species classifiers make it feasible to process large audio datasets but generate numerous detections that often need validation before use in downstream analyses or formal outputs. 2. Method development in PAM has focused on classifier building and downstream models that account for imperfect detection, yet the practical step between these - post-classification validation - remains weakly supported and is often implemented through ad hoc workflows. This increases manual handling, creates scope for transcription or consolidation errors, limits transparency and makes it difficult to document what was reviewed. 3. We introduce PAMalytics, an open-source, no-code, local browser-based application to support post-classification validation as a standardised workflow stage. PAMalytics ingests detections from any classifier, allows users to define how detections are sampled for review, and presents selected detections alongside their spectrograms with audio playback in one unified interface. Sampling strategy and review decisions are tracked alongside reviewer identity improving traceability and reproducibility across the validation workflow. 4. Case studies with Conservation International Cambodia and Imperial College London demonstrate PAMalytics in two validation settings. In Cambodia, gibbon predictions from a large, uneven dataset were sampled within sites, with likely classifier errors prioritised for validation. At Imperial, Amazon bird detections were sampled across each species classifier-confidence range before biodiversity metrics were derived. In both cases, PAMalytics reduced manual handling and validation time. By turning an ad hoc step into an accessible, structured workflow for conservation practitioners, PAMalytics fills a practical gap in the PAM bioacoustics pipeline and strengthens the link between automated detections and evidence used in biodiversity monitoring and reporting.