bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.07.29.740903

Equi-depth pooling for standardized and cost-effective Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire sequencing (AIRRseq)

Abstract

Bulk B- and T-cell adaptive immune receptor (BCR/TCR) repertoire sequencing (AIRRseq) enables comprehensive analysis of adaptive immune diversity, but achieving balanced sequencing depth across heterogeneous clinical samples remains a major cost driver. Standard equimolar pooling prior to sequencing disproportionately allocates reads, leading to undersequencing of libraries with high sequence abundance and oversampling of those with few sequences. Here, a quantitative pooling strategy is described in which libraries are pooled based on estimated target-specific unique molecular identifier (UMI) counts rather than library molarity, ensuring a uniform number of supporting reads per target sequence UMI across samples. Libraries were prepared from human RNA using the NEBNext Immune Sequencing (IS) kit and quantified by qPCR during the second amplification (PCR2) step. Deeply sequenced samples from a dengue 1 human infection model (DHIM1) clinical study were used to model the log-linear relationship between PCR2 cycle threshold (Ct) values and detected sequence counts. This model was then applied to a second, independent batch of samples from a dengue 3 human infection model (DHIM3) clinical study to predict UMI abundance and guide equi-depth pooling prior to sequencing. Sequencing of these equi-depth pools demonstrated a near-uniform reads-per-sequence ratio across samples, confirming that this approach achieves balanced depth without oversampling and at reduced cost. Simulations across a range of between-sample UMI-count distributions reflecting real-world sample pools showed that equi-depth pooling is expected to reduce the total number of required sequencing reads by approximately 70% compared with equimolar pooling, with savings increasing as the spread of library sizes grows. Beyond cost efficiency, equi-depth pooling eliminates the complexity-dependent sampling bias inherent to equimolar pooling, ensuring uniform sequencing depth and comparable UMI recovery across small and large libraries. For new workflows or sample types, implementation requires either an existing calibration dataset or a pilot sequencing experiment to establish the relationship between PCR2 Ct values and relative UMI abundance. The equi-depth method thus provides a robust, scalable, and cost-efficient strategy for bulk AIRRseq studies where library sizes vary widely.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Verdonckt, T.-W., Sahulcik, M., Struyfs, C., Vermeersch, A.-S., Bartholomeeusen, K., Van Nieuwerburgh, F., Lagatie, O., Arien, K. K.. 2026-08-01. Equi-depth pooling for standardized and cost-effective Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire sequencing (AIRRseq). https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.07.29.740903

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗