Location dependence of protein intrinsic disorder in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract

The relevance of protein structural flexibility in function remains contested, but experimental and computational evidence continues to accumulate. Many efforts to address this investigate intrinsic disorder, which commonly refers to peptide segments or entire protein sequences that presumably lack structure and exhibit high flexibility/conformational heterogeneity under physiological conditions. These efforts face challenges such as conflicting computational predictions and ambiguous relationships among intrinsic disorder locations and other protein properties. We address these challenges at a genome-wide scale in Drosophila melanogaster using residue-level predictions for various protein properties. We employ single and consensus approaches to quantify the prevalence of intrinsic disorder and attempt to infer function by testing for differences along protein sequences. Intrinsic disorder is likely more common at terminals than internal regions, and amino acid frequencies can vary substantially between regions in a manner that plausibly reflects functions of intrinsic disorder, rather than only proteome-wide effects. Tertiary structure potentially underlies the prevalence of intrinsic disorder along protein sequences; this prevalence varies more in a putatively solvent-exposed context than a solvent-buried one. Protein-binding appears to be a main function of intrinsic disorder, and we find support consistent with the notion that structural flexibility fosters binding plasticity, and show that location and protein length are factors in this relationship. Nucleic acid-binding and linker are ostensibly less common disorder functions than protein-binding, but nucleic acid-binding seems more localized at terminals. Residue-level estimates of selection pressure indicate that disordered regions generally evolve under weaker sequence constraints than structured regions, except at the N-terminal region. Biases in disorder prediction are a considerable factor in many of the observations, but unlikely a full explanation. The findings strengthen support for functional relevance of flexibility, offer insight into protein architecture and function, and lend impetus for experimental inquiry.