bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.06.18.733155

A shared functional architecture for error-based and reinforcement-based motor learning in the human brain

Abstract

The motor system can flexibly learn from fundamentally different teaching signals, from directional errors to rewards. While computational and neurobiological models have long assigned these to distinct error-based learning (EL) and reinforcement-based learning (RL) processes, whether this separation holds at the level of whole-brain network architecture has not been directly tested. Here, we characterized whole-brain functional connectivity manifolds in the same participants as they performed separate EL and RL motor tasks -- differing in both feedback type and motor structure -- during two fMRI sessions. By jointly embedding covariance patterns from both tasks into a common low-dimensional neural space, we isolated task-general from task-specific learning-related network reconfigurations. We show that both forms of motor learning induce converging changes in the manifold structure of higher-order transmodal cortex, with comparatively limited task-specific modulation. Notably, this convergence extended to the cerebellum and basal ganglia, the canonical substrates of error-based and reward-based learning, which reconfigured comparably across both tasks. Against this shared backdrop, we found that the posterior medial cortex exhibited a unique functional geometry, selectively redistributing its connectivity across distinct brain circuits depending on feedback type and learning stage. We further demonstrate that individual differences in domain-general motor learning ability are associated with stage-dependent reconfigurations within limbic, default-mode, and attentional systems. These findings indicate that flexible motor adaptation, irrespective of the nature of the learning signal, is supported less by changes within task-specific sensorimotor circuits than by the dynamic reorganization of higher-order brain networks that coordinate them.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rowchan, K., Areshenkoff, C. N., Rezaei, A., Ansari Esfeh, M., Gale, D. J., Flanagan, R., Wammes, J. D., Gallivan, J. P.. 2026-06-19. A shared functional architecture for error-based and reinforcement-based motor learning in the human brain. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.18.733155

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Attention Across Scales: From Individual Variation to Social Hierarchies and Brain Networks in Semi-Free-Ranging Macaques

Attention is a fundamental brain function supporting perception, decision-making, and social behavior, and its dysfunction profoundly impairs daily life. It is both dynamic and stable, varying across observations and individuals, changing across the lifespan, and being shaped by social and environmental experience. Yet capturing this complexity remains a central challenge in neuroscience. Here, we integrated longitudinal behavioral assessments of semi-free-ranging macaques living in naturalistic social groups with resting-state fMRI. We quantified performance across days, ages, and social hierarchies and related it to intrinsic brain organization. Distinct attentional phenotypes emerged, including individuals with reduced attentional control. Performance followed an inverted-U lifespan trajectory, improving from childhood to adulthood before declining. Social status modulated attentional performance. Critically, nonlinear lifespan trajectories and associations with individual attentional differences were most clearly expressed in frontoparietal connectivity. Together, these findings reveal how sustained attention is organized across scales, providing a biological framework for its individual diversity, social modulation, and neural basis.

neuroscience↗

Decoding natural scenes from patterned optogenetic responses in mouse visual cortex

A central challenge in developing visual cortical prostheses is to determine how visual stimuli should be transformed into effective patterns of cortical stimulation. Although advances in stimulation technologies, including optogenetics, provide increasingly precise control over cortical activity, it remains unclear whether artificially evoked activity can reproduce the information content of naturally evoked visual representations. Here we establish a quantitative framework for evaluating visual encoding strategies by decoding cortical responses evoked by natural vision and patterned optogenetic stimulation. We developed a novel dual-modal paradigm in awake mice to bridge the gap between endogenous photostimulation and artificial network driving. By co-expressing the high-performance calcium indicator GCaMP6s and the red-shifted, ultra-sensitive opsin rsChRmine-oScarlet in the primary visual cortex (V1), we successfully translated dynamic natural movie frames into patterned, spatiotemporal optogenetic stimulation. Quantitative comparisons of macro-scale dynamics demonstrated that this patterned optogenetic injection evokes cortical states highly comparable and representationally aligned with those driven by actual visual photostimulation. To systematically evaluate the fidelity of these responses, we developed STAR, a deep learning model featuring spatial and temporal attention mechanisms, and successfully reconstructed the frames of natural movies from V1 signals under both experimental modalities. Collectively, our results demonstrate that complex sensory information can be both naturally encoded and synthetically injected into V1 circuits with high decoding fidelity. This work provides an empirical and computational proof-of-concept for intelligent, closed-loop biomimetic encoders, establishing a robust framework for next-generation cortical visual neuroprostheses and bidirectional brain-machine interfaces.

neuroscience↗

Why Is Spontaneous Blink Timing Informative? An Adaptive Scheduling Perspective

Spontaneous eye blinks have long been linked to cognitive processing, yet how task demands shape blink timing and its relationship to behavioral performance remains unclear. We examined spontaneous blink behavior in 576 adults performing two variants of the Continuous Performance Task (CPT). Blink occurrence and timing were most strongly modulated by the experimental condition in the more demanding CPT-AX task, whereas their association with response time was stronger in the CPT-X task, where more consistent blink timing predicted faster responses. This dissociation suggests that task structure changes not only blink behavior but also the behavioral relevance of blink timing. These findings are consistent with an adaptive scheduling account of spontaneous blinking and provide a conceptual framework for understanding when and why blink timing contains chronometric information about ongoing cognition.

neuroscience↗