Using spatial prioritization to navigate current and future tradeoffs when controlling invaders

Abstract

Controlling invasive species is a global conservation priority but is typically resource-limited, necessitating strategies to optimize control. Spatial prioritization methods can improve the efficiency of invader control by quantifying the benefits, costs, and risks of alternative intervention strategies. Yet prioritization designs are sensitive to the distinction between protecting native populations that are currently sympatric with invaders versus safeguarding presently allopatric native populations by preventing invader expansion. Gaining a better understanding of this distinction stands to improve our ability to prioritize the management of invaders whose distributions--and thus impacts on native species--are dynamic. We asked how prioritization designs addressing current versus future invader threats affected tradeoffs among focal species protection, biodiversity conservation, disturbance risk, and overlap with existing conservation infrastructure. As a case study, we spatially prioritized population control of invasive barred owls (Strix varia) in the northwestern US. We found that distinguishing between current versus future threats posed by barred owls to the native spotted owl (S. occidentalis) strongly mediated whether invader control stood to benefit native at-risk animal communities. Furthermore, this distinction also affected the degree to which population control would overlap with fire risk and federally protected forests, both of which plausibly affect the viability and success of conservation action. These results thus illustrate that deciding to prioritize the control of invaders based on their current versus future impacts on native species can dramatically affect the distribution and characteristics of high-priority areas for management. Our findings also directly inform control of barred owls in the northwestern US: we found that prioritizing future threats to spotted owls could protect at-risk amphibian communities from novel barred owl predation, but that high fire risk and minimal protected forest may complicate implementation. Thus, in both our system and more broadly, spatial prioritization methods are an important tool for quantitative, reproducible, and successful invader control.