bioRxiv Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/bioRxiv

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.05.27.727884

Taxonomic profilers and their influence on metagenomic diversity analyses

Rondeau-Leclaire, J.·Blanchet, G.·Jacques, P.-E.·Laforest-Lapointe, I.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Estimating taxonomic profiles is a central task in microbiome research. Several bioinformatic tools have been developed for this purpose, differing in algorithmic strategy, reference database flexibility, sensitivity parameters, and the type of abundance they estimate. As a result, taxonomic profiles carry an unwanted methodological signal whose driving characteristics remains understudied. While benchmarks have evaluated the performance of some of these tools, they rely on simulated data; little work has been done to compare them using real metagenomes in the presence of noise and uncharacterised diversity. Overall, the impact of taxonomic profiler choice and parameterisation on scientific conclusions remains poorly understood. First, we provide a much-needed characterisation of four taxonomic profilers to help researchers better understand the available bioinformatic tools and inform their methodological choices. Then, we leverage 1,211 shotgun metagenomes from eight datasets to compare these taxonomic profilers across 13 methodological designs. Based on diversity indices, we found substantial variability in estimated taxonomic composition depending on methodological features such as reference database and algorithmic strategy. Alpha diversity analysis was substantially sensitive totool choice (particularly among k-mer-based tools) and reference database. Beta diversity showed sensitivity to both database and parameter choices, yet this variability barely affected statistical inference. Our findings highlight the sensitivity of taxonomic diversity analyses to taxonomic profiling methodology and the importance for researchers to consider assessing the robustness of their results to choice of tool, parameter, and reference database. Crucially, differences in sample diversity across methodologies are symptomatic of differences in estimated taxonomic composition, which can affect any analysis based on taxonomic abundances. Overall, this study underscores the importance of tool selection and parametrisation, and of conducting sensitivity analyses to support robust and reliable scientific conclusions. AUTHOR SUMMARYMicrobiome research relies on bioinformatic tools to determine which microbes are present in a sample and estimate their relative abundances, a process known as taxonomic profiling. Because this task requires comparing tens of millions of DNA sequences against thousands of microbial genomes, a wide range of computational strategies have been developed to make profiling accurate and efficient. As a result, many taxonomic profilers are now available, yet do not provide the same results. Although previous studies have evaluated their precision and sensitivity, less attention has been given to how the choice of profiler may influence the scientific conclusions drawn from microbiome data. Here, we selected four widely used taxonomic profilers to examine whether researchers would reach the same biological conclusions when comparing microbiomes across groups of samples, such as healthy and diseased individuals. We show that different profilers can lead to different biological conclusions and identify key tool characteristics that contribute to these discrepancies. Moreover, we provide a comparative overview of these four profilers, offering practical guidance for researchers seeking to choose the most appropriate tool for their study. These findings highlight the importance of software choice in microbiome research and support more transparent and reproducible data analysis practices.

Explore related subjects

bioinformaticsPreprint

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rondeau-Leclaire, J., Blanchet, G., Jacques, P.-E., Laforest-Lapointe, I.. 2026-05-30. Taxonomic profilers and their influence on metagenomic diversity analyses. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.27.727884

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

bioRxiv2026

A meta-interaction basis for cell-cell communication in tissues

Tissue function depends on signals exchanged between cells and the responses they elicit. Yet whether diverse cell-cell interactions in situ form recurrent sender-receiver programs remains unclear. We present SpiderNet, an interpretable representation-learning framework that discovers such directed programs as a compact basis of cell-cell meta-interactions (MIs) from spatial transcriptomics. SpiderNet jointly learns which sender regulators, ligand-receptor pairs, and receiver targets define each MI and where each program is active across neighboring cell pairs. The resulting representation traces multicellular relays and links communication to cell states, perturbation responses, and phenotypes. SpiderNet recovers ground-truth MIs and their molecular components in simulations and, in real tissues, shows stronger direction-specific agreement with independently curated regulatory programs in senders and receivers than alternative methods. Across more than 5.8 million spatially profiled cells, SpiderNet resolves an SPP1-THBS relay linking monocytes, fibroblasts, and tumor cells within an immune-suppressive ovarian cancer niche, predicts T-cell responses to held-out melanoma-cell perturbations, and identifies a T-cell-associated brain-aging program and age-predictive signals that transfer across regions and platforms. It reveals a recurrent pan-cancer COLLAGEN-linked fibroblast-tumor program whose projected abundance in independent cohorts is associated with poorer survival and non-response to immunotherapy. SpiderNet thus establishes MIs as a reusable organizational layer between molecular interactions and tissue phenotypes, providing a framework to resolve, compare, trace, and perturb multicellular regulation in situ.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning for Drug-Gene-Disease Motif Prediction

Drug repurposing and target discovery offer critical strategies for advancing therapeutic development by uncovering the potential biological pathways and novel associations among drugs, genes, and diseases. However, experimental discovery remains expensive and time-consuming, which limits the scalability of large-scale studies. In addition, existing computational approaches often struggle to effectively integrate heterogeneous biomedical data, capture the complex higher-order topological signatures of biological interactomes, and generalize to unseen entities. Here, we present HANAMI (Heterogeneous grAph coNtrastive leArning for drug-gene-disease Motif predIction), a multi-view deep graph learning framework designed to model complex interactions among drugs, genes, and diseases. HANAMI integrates diverse heterogeneous biomedical knowledge, including chemical structures, genomic sequences, and clinical phenotypes, and leverages relation-aware topology encoding, structure-aware aggregation, and contrastive learning to enable accurate motif prediction with biological context from the network. Systematic evaluation on benchmark datasets shows that HANAMI achieves up to 6% improvements over existing state-of-the-art methods in predicting drug-gene-disease motifs. The framework further demonstrates strong inductive generalization, maintaining an [~]18% performance advantage in zero-shot settings involving previously unseen entities. Beyond predictive performance, HANAMI effectively prioritizes drug-disease relationships investigated in Phase II or III trials while identifying candidate genes that suggest plausible mechanistic links. Together, HANAMI provides a computational framework for interpreting complex biomedical interactions, offering a scalable foundation to accelerate drug repurposing and therapeutic innovation.

bioinformatics↗
bioRxiv2026

PTMExplorer: A Multi-Dimensional Integrative Visualization Platform for Protein Post-Translational Modification Function and Structure

Deciphering the functions of post-translational modifications (PTMs) is a critical bridge connecting large-scale modification proteomics data to mechanistic studies. However, most existing tools for visualizing PTM omics data are limited to site catalogs or single-dimensional feature displays. They lack the capability to simultaneously map user-derived differential modification sites onto multi-dimensional contexts, including protein three-dimensional (3D) structure, evolutionary conservation, functional sites, and disease associations. This limitation makes it difficult for researchers to rapidly assess the biological importance of candidate sites from among a vast number of differentially modified sites. Here, we present PTMExplorer, an interactive platform for the multi-dimensional visualization of protein PTMs. PTMExplorer comprises three core modules: PTM Inspector, built upon ProtVista, provides a multi-track, sequence-feature integrated view incorporating intrinsically disordered region (IDR) prediction (via flDPnn), surface accessibility calculation (via FreeSASA), and UniProt functional annotations; PTM 3D Locator, leveraging the Nightingale/Mol* engine, anchors modification sites onto AlphaFold/Protein Data Bank (PDB) 3D structures through residue mapping via PDBe-SIFTS; and PTM Overview, utilizing the R circlize package, presents a panoramic polar circos plot illustrating modification distribution and inter-group differential regulation. Additionally, three major disease-associated modification databases (PTMD, qPTM, and PhosCancer) are integrated as PTM-Disease Nexus, enabling co-localization comparison between user-defined differential sites and reported disease-related sites. PTMExplorer currently supports eight model organisms, accepts user-uploaded differential analysis results, and provides multi-dimensional annotations and various visualization options (https://www.bioladder.cn/PTMExplorer/). Using a multi-omics dataset from hepatocellular carcinoma (18 patients, 9 modification types) as a case study, we demonstrate the practical utility of PTMExplorer in screening potential biomarkers, revealing multi-modification coordination mechanisms, and distinguishing between absolute and relative quantification patterns.

bioinformatics↗