High-Speed Mass Spectrometers diminish the difference between Data-Dependent and Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics

Abstract

Data-dependent acquisition mass spectrometry (DDA-MS) and data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS) have historically offered complementary strengths in bottom-up proteomics, with DDA providing high-selectivity spectra for post-translational modification (PTM) analysis and DIA enabling more systematic peptide sampling. Here, we asked if this is still the case for the Orbitrap Astral platform that offers high-speed DDA and (ultra-) narrow-window DIA (nDIA) capabilities across proteome and phosphoproteome applications. When DDA and DIA measurements were parameter-matched (to the extent possible), the differences in analytical performance diminished markedly. Across extensive replicate analyses, both methods continued to identify new peptides and proteins without reaching saturation, indicating that the molecular complexity of biological samples still overwhelms even the fastest liquid chromatography-MS (LC-MS) methods. Incomplete sampling also contributed to substantial peptide-level non-overlap between DDA and nDIA and data completeness was only modestly better for nDIA than DDA across many replicates. Quantitatively, DDA and nDIA showed broadly similar precision and accuracy, with nDIA offering slightly higher precision and DDA slightly better accuracy in controlled mixture experiments. MS1-based quantification outperformed MS2-based quantification, particularly for short gradients, supporting MS1 quantification as a robust and general strategy for high-throughput proteomics. In phosphoproteomic samples, DDA and nDIA identified similar numbers of phosphopeptides, but DDA retained a small edge for phosphorylation site localisation. Together, the results show that advances in acquisition speed and sensitivity are narrowing the historical gap between DDA and DIA, while also revealing that current LC-MS workflows remain far from providing comprehensive proteome coverage. Going forward, further gains in dynamic range, scan speed, sensitivity, and transparent software tools will be required to reach systematic, comprehensive and reliable measurements of complex proteomes in a single shot.