bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.05.21.726843

Protein-level prediction of Klebsiella phage adsorption identifies conserved receptor-binding motifs.

Abstract

Bacteriophage therapy offers a potential route to treat antibiotic-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections, but its use is limited by the narrow specificity of phage-host interactions. In Klebsiella, adsorption is largely determined by receptor-binding proteins (RBPs) that recognize bacterial capsular polysaccharides, yet current machine learning approaches often represent whole phages rather than the individual proteins that mediate recognition. Here, we ask whether adsorption can be predicted at the level of single RBPs and whether the resulting models can identify the molecular features responsible for host specificity. Using experimentally validated Klebsiella phage-host interactions, we extended the PhageHostLearn framework from averaged phage-level representations to individual RBP-level predictions. We found that single-RBP models recover the predictive performance of strain-level models when host capsule identity is explicitly represented. However, models trained only on interaction-level labels did not reliably distinguish motif-bearing RBPs from other viral proteins, indicating that protein-level inputs alone are insufficient for mechanistic interpretability. To resolve this ambiguity, we identified serotype-specific conserved motifs among RBPs from phages infecting the same capsular type. Structural modelling showed that these motifs localize to exposed regions of RBPs and resemble carbohydrate-binding modules. Incorporating motif information into a relabelled training scheme improved prioritization of motif-bearing RBPs while preserving interaction-level predictive power. We further identified a candidate multi-motif RBP from phage S8c that may recognize multiple capsular serotypes. Together, these results support a modular model of Klebsiella phage adsorption in which conserved sub-protein elements drive capsule recognition. More broadly, this work shows how protein-level machine learning combined with biological constraints can move beyond accurate phage-host prediction toward mechanistic identification of host-range determinants. Author summaryBacteriophages -viruses that infect bacteria- are being explored as alternatives to antibiotics, especially against drug-resistant pathogens such as Klebsiella pneumoniae. The challenge is specificity: each phage attaches to only a narrow range of bacterial strains, recognising them through proteins on its tail that bind the bacteriums protective sugar capsule. Choosing or engineering the right phage for a given infection therefore requires understanding what these recognition proteins actually do. We asked whether a machine learning model could move beyond predicting which phages infect a given strain and start identifying which protein on the phage drives that recognition. Prediction alone, we found, is not enough: a model can be accurate without pointing to the responsible protein. To bridge this gap, we searched for short shared sequences among recognition proteins from phages that infect bacteria with the same capsule type, and used these shared patterns to guide the model. This combination correctly prioritised the recognition protein far more often than chance. One phage protein, from phage S8c, carried patterns matching five different capsule types, suggesting a candidate broadly-recognising protein for future experimental study.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fumagalli, F., Spigler, G.. 2026-05-23. Protein-level prediction of Klebsiella phage adsorption identifies conserved receptor-binding motifs.. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.05.21.726843

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

BiomiX 3.0: A user-friendly platform for democratized multi-omics integration with graph-based learning.

Background Multi-omics integration has emerged as a powerful strategy to decode the molecular complexity of biological systems. However, the diversity of available methods, each designed with distinct assumptions, objectives, and computational requirements, makes method selection, usage and interpretation challenging for nonexpert users. Here we present BiomiX 3.0, an updated version of the BiomiX platform that extends its integration capabilities with four additional methods: Similarity Network Fusion (SNF), NEighborhood-based Multi-Omics clustering (NEMO), Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker discovery using Latent variable approaches for Omics studies (DIABLO), and PRAMIGO (Phenotyping netwoRk Application for Multi-omics InteGratiOn), a novel supervised heterogeneous graph transformer (HGT) introduced in this work. Results We benchmarked all five methods, MOFA, DIABLO, SNF, NEMO, and PRAMIGO, on two independent multiomics datasets derived from a Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) cohort comparing IGHV-mutated and unmutated patients, and a pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) cohort versus healthy controls. Supervised methods (DIABLO, PRAMIGO) consistently achieved higher condition-specific discrimination as measured by the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) and the Adjusted Mutual Information (AMI). In contrast, unsupervised methods (SNF, NEMO) revealed alternative patient stratifications driven by independent sources of biological variance while MOFA performed in a semi-supervised way occupies an intermediate position, capturing latent factors that explain both disease-associated and orthogonal sources of variance. Systematic gene-centric analysis of the top-ranked features prioritized by each method was supported by manual biological annotation of shared and method-specific signals. Across cohorts, we annotated 154 shared features (116 genes, 38 metabolites) and 60 method-unique features per cohort, demonstrating that no single integration strategy captures the full landscape of biologically relevant signals. In the CLL cohort, shared features spanned B-cell receptor biology, innate immune signaling, RAS/MAPK activation, and epigenetic regulation, while methodunique features revealed supervised-method-specific insights into vesicle trafficking (DIABLO), immune checkpoints (MOFA), and ncRNA regulation (PRAMIGO). In the PTB cohort, a convergent interferon/innate immune signature dominated shared features across all methods. Still, method-unique analysis uncovered DIABLO-specific acylcarnitine metabolic reprogramming, MOFA-specific restoration of lysosomal trafficking, and PRAMIGO-specific {gamma}{delta} T-cell and immunoglobulin repertoire diversity. Across both cohorts, SNF and NEMO proved useful for detecting biological and technical sources of variation that were orthogonal to the primary condition of interest. Ultimately, PRAMIGO uniquely enables the construction of heterogeneous graphs modeling cross-modal molecular interactions, uncovering epigenetic co-regulation programs in CLL and multi-omics inflammatory modules in PTB that are difficult to identify using conventional integration approaches. Conclusions BiomiX 3.0 provides a graphical user interface (GUI) multi-method integration environment that democratizes access to state-of-the-art multi-omics analysis. By combining both unsupervised and supervised integration strategies within a unified platform and introducing graph-based learning through PRAMIGO, BiomiX 3.0 enables researchers across disciplines with complementary tools to interrogate the biological sources of variation in their data, without requiring bioinformatics expertise.

bioinformatics↗

Perfect 21-nucleotide matches to beneficial fungi are common in canonical antifungal dsRNA targets: an in-silico off-target hazard screen for spray-induced gene silencing

Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) biopesticides that silence essential fungal genes by spray-induced gene silencing (SIGS) are advancing towards registration, underpinned by the claim that silencing is confined to sequence-matched target organisms, a claim that has never been tested systematically against beneficial fungi. We screened twelve dsRNA constructs (the whole transcripts of eleven canonical antifungal target genes of Fusarium graminearum: three CYP51 sterol 14-demethylases, six chitin synthases and two {beta}-tubulins, plus a concatenation of the three CYP51 transcripts modelling the flagship CYP3RNA design) for perfect 21-nucleotide (21-nt) identity, the primary match criterion of recent regulatory bioinformatics frameworks, against the transcriptomes of seven non-target fungi, including commercial biocontrol agents (Trichoderma harzianum, T. virens, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, M. brunneum), the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eleven of the twelve constructs carried off-target hazard; only CYP51C was completely clean. TUB2b carried 580 perfect 21-nt matches and contained no hazard-free window of 250 consecutive 21-mer start positions, whereas 26.6-60.0% of screened windows were hazard-free in the designable genes. Hits landed overwhelmingly on orthologues of the targeted gene and concentrated in the Hypocreales; R. irregularis and S. cerevisiae were nearly clean. These are hazard findings, not risk findings: perfect siRNA-length matches to beneficial fungi are common in canonical antifungal dsRNA targets, and current regulatory screening panels contain no fungus that would detect them.

bioinformatics↗

Fitting dynamics is not identifying causal edges: a white-box masked ODE benchmark for trans-omics digital twins of drug action mechanisms

Multi-component drug regimens, with traditional Chinese medicine formulas as the hardest case, act across signalling, transcriptional, proteomic and metabolic layers, and elucidating their mechanisms requires dynamic models that predict molecular trajectories rather than static association networks. Trainable ordinary differential equation (ODE) systems fitted to time-series omics are increasingly used for this purpose; yet their validation remains fit-based: at genomic scale, no ground truth has existed to test whether a good fit implies correct mechanisms. Here we build that ground truth: a white-box masked ODE benchmark on the real trans-omics topology of insulin action in mouse liver (transcriptome GEO GSE166336, proteome ProteomeXchange PXD022728, phosphoproteome PXD022823, metabolome source-publication Tables S2-S3; 2,106 molecular species; 4,912 ground-truth edges), with controllable noise, missingness and sampling budgets. Four instruments quantify identifiability: an oracle-perturbation basin curve, a held-out-layer corruption assay, a saturation audit, and an ideal-budget ceiling test. We find that a static baseline (FD + LASSO) performs at chance (AUROC ~ 0.50, except GE at 0.567); that from-scratch training remains at chance even with noise-free, fully observed, densely sampled data (per-layer AUROC 0.48-0.53); that held out layers act as corruption sinks whose failure decomposes into an information floor, a scale-mismatch amplifier, and an edge-gradient drag, curable only jointly; that tanh saturation silently zeroes entire regulator columns; and that a 12-knockout validation battery decomposes intervention reliability by network distance. We distill these into operational prescriptions. The binding constraint is not fitting but structural identifiability. Benchmark, code and audit tools are planned for open release upon publication.

bioinformatics↗