bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.30.721839

PDBe-SIFTS: an open-source tool for Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy, and Sequences, featuring improved alignment, scoring scheme, and accelerated search

Abstract

Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy and Sequences (SIFTS) provides residue-level mappings between UniProt Knowledgebase sequences and Protein Data Bank structures and has historically been generated through internal Protein Data Bank in Europe (PDBe) pipelines. Here, PDBe-SIFTS is presented as a fully open-source, locally deployable implementation of this mapping framework. The pipeline combines fast, scalable sequence search using MMseqs2, an improved bounded scoring scheme for ranking candidate mappings, and residue-level mapping refinement based on backbone connectivity. PDBe-SIFTS is distributed as a Python package with command-line tools for 1) building a sequence search database, 2) identifying the best sequence-structure match, 3) one-to-one mapping at the residue level, and 4) generating SIFTS annotations in PDBx/mmCIF format. Benchmarking on the complete Protein Data Bank archive showed that MMseqs2 reduced archive-scale UniProtKB searches from hours with BLASTP to minutes, approximately 22-36 times faster, while curated mappings were recovered at top rank in 93.1% of cases. The remaining discrepancies mainly involved biologically ambiguous cases such as highly conserved proteins, chimeric constructs, or closely related orthologs. These results show that PDBe-SIFTS enables fast mapping, improving structural coherence in residue-level alignments while delivering the most up-to-date and accurate mappings, comparable to expert curation. Tool: https://github.com/PDBeurope/SIFTS Quick start notebook with example: https://github.com/PDBeurope/SIFTS/tree/master/notebooks Broader audience statementMatching protein sequences to their three-dimensional structures, and mapping annotations across both, is essential for understanding protein function, interactions, and molecular mechanisms. This integrated view enables richer interpretation of biological data and underpins advances in drug discovery, disease research, and protein engineering. PDBe-SIFTS provides an open and functional framework for structure-sequence mapping, allowing researchers and databases to run, inspect, and extend these mappings locally, while benefiting from faster searches, transparent scoring, and structurally informed residue-level alignments. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=110 SRC="FIGDIR/small/721839v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5e6ea6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b2754dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1334f9forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b083a1_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Bellaiche, A., Choudhary, P., Nair, S., Harrus, D., Yu, C. W.-H., Tanweer, S. A., Evans, G. L., Lo, S. W., Martin, M., Fleming, J. R., Velankar, S.. 2026-05-04. PDBe-SIFTS: an open-source tool for Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy, and Sequences, featuring improved alignment, scoring scheme, and accelerated search. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.30.721839

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

deepTools4: Faster, Scalable, and Modernized Genomic Data Analysis

The deepTools suite is widely used for quality control, summarization, and visualization of high-throughput sequencing data. However, as genomic datasets grow in scale and depth, existing tools often become computational bottlenecks. We present deepTools4, a modernized framework designed for high performance, scalability, and enhanced usability, while maintaining seamless integration with the Galaxy platform. Core functionality has been rewritten and thoroughly benchmarked, achieving substantial computational speed-ups. Visualization tools have been modernized to provide more intuitive, high-quality graphical outputs. In addition, our testing framework has been expanded to facilitate continuous development and ensure robustness. We demonstrate the utility of deepTools4 across diverse epigenomics and transcriptomics datasets, highlighting its ability to summarize genome-wide signals, apply a wide range of common normalization methods, and visualize enrichment patterns. The enhanced deepTools4 framework delivers a faster, more scalable solution for reproducible genome-wide analysis and interpretation across many sequencing modalities. Availability: https://github.com/deeptools/deepTools/

bioinformatics↗

Reproducibility and cross-dataset concordance of drug-induced transcriptional responses

Drug-perturbation transcriptomic resources are expanding, but the reproducibility and cross-source consistency of the responses they measure remain critical to their use. We compared six resources using independent replicates, matched-drug analyses, and response decomposition. High agreement in treated expression did not translate into equally repeatable drug-induced changes. Cross-source response concordance was generally limited, including under matched cell and treatment conditions, although some comparisons retained drug-specific information. In Tahoe, a control-expression-only baseline left substantial drug-specific variation unresolved. Measured drug main effects - the average responses across cell lines - provided information for predicting cell-specific interactions, with this relationship retained in a cross-plate validation. Exploratory analyses of structure, target, and external-response representations identified modest signals in selected pipelines. Together, these analyses characterize the reliability and transferability of current perturbation resources and identify prediction of drug main effects as a key bottleneck in the framework examined, motivating shared reference measurements and better recovery of drug-specific responses.

bioinformatics↗

Propensity-Adjusted AUC under Nuisance-Model Misspecification

Propensity adjustment compares medical-image detector scores within groups with similar measured properties, such as stain or focus. We examine its sensitivity to the nuisance model that forms those groups. Under Gaussian latent-index assumptions and exact linear-index strata, a closed-form correlation gives an exact boundary for adjusted AUC to fall below one half. Quadrature matches 36 simulation cells within 0.008. Inflation and attenuation relative to correct adjustment are empirical findings, not general ordering results. An overlap screen and a self-stratified control introduced for this study miss 140 of 141 simulated cells with absolute error above 0.05: checking the fitted propensity cannot certify completeness of the adjustment set. On real pathology corpora, logistic and boosted-tree models using the same 16 features disagree. Among splits where both pass both checks, mean adjusted-AUC gaps are 0.057 on acid-fast bacilli (AFB), 0.048 on Kaggle, and 0.049 on PCam, over three, five, and three splits respectively. These gaps measure model sensitivity; neither estimate is known to be correct. A controlled colour shift moves adjusted AUC relative to model-specific references in the predicted direction in 78 of 80 label-dependent cells. Broader balance and label-fit diagnostics favour trees without certifying their adjusted AUC. We recommend reporting sensitivity across nuisance models alongside these diagnostics. Reversal relative to known truth occurs in constructed stress tests; its frequency in practice remains unknown.

bioinformatics↗