bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.27.721057

Do sex differences in autosomal recombination rates facilitate divergence?

Abstract

Recombination rate varies within and between individuals. One form of such variations is seen between sexes in dioecious populations, with males typically exhibiting a smaller recombination rate than females. This is true both for sex chromosomes and autosomes (so-called heterochiasmy). Although a large body of theory exists on the role of sex chromosomes in adaptation and population divergence, much less is known about the role of heterochiasmy. Recently, it has been suggested that heterochiasmy can facilitate local adaptation and divergence, but if, and when this is true has not been systematically studied theoretically to date. Here we use Individual-based simulations to assess the effect of sex differences in autosomal recombination rates on the process of divergence and adaptation in populations subject to divergent selection and migration. We found evidence supporting that sex differences in autosomal recombination rate between adaptive loci can facilitate, and especially maintain, divergence, but this is true only under very limited conditions, involving strong selection, high sex-averaged effective recombination rates and relatively high rates of migration compared to the strength of selection. We further found that this effect, when present, is typically weak but is amplified in cases of highly polygenic adaptation in comparison to cases with a few adaptive loci of strong effect. We conclude that, in most cases, sex differences in autosomal recombination rate alone are unlikely to noticeably contribute to the process of adaptation and divergence. Further studies are needed to evaluate their effect in combination with other processes not considered in the present study, such as assortative mating between the alike mates, or recombination suppression in heterozygotes. TeaserIn dioecious populations, recombination rate typically differs between males and females. This is true both for sex chromosomes and autosomes. While much theoretical research has focused on understanding how recombination rate differences in sex chromosomes shape local adaptation and divergence, we lack theoretical knowledge of the potential role of sex differences in autosomal recombination rates. Recombination has a dual role in local adaptation. Strong recombination can effectively purge deleterious alleles, but it can also break apart beneficial allele complexes (and vice versa for weak recombination). Thus, one may expect that in the presence of both strong and weak recombination exhibited by females, and males, respectively, population divergence can be efficiently facilitated. But is this true? Here, we study this question theoretically using computer simulations. Our main finding is that sex differences in autosomal recombination can facilitate divergence, but this effect is typically weak and present only under very stringent conditions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hansson, A., Rafajlovic, M.. 2026-04-29. Do sex differences in autosomal recombination rates facilitate divergence?. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.27.721057

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

RELAX does not reproduce its own estimates at default settings, and its output does not show it

Selection-intensity estimates from RELAX are reported as a point value of K with a likelihood-ratio P. We report that, at default settings and on data of ordinary size, the program does not reproduce its own fits. Of 27 enzyme entries refitted under two optimiser configurations, none reproduced its log-likelihood to within 0.01 units; the median change was 103 units, the largest over 3,400, and four verdicts reversed. Eighty null orthologues reproduced none. A byte-identical command returned a distinct likelihood on every repetition, single-threaded, across three releases, and on alignments simulated under the fitted model, where 3.3 per cent of replicates reproduced. The documented random-number seed never reaches the generator when assigned on the command line, yet reads back as the value supplied. PAML localises the cause: its two-ratio model, without site classes, reproduced its log-likelihood for all 288 genes; its site-class models agreed for 27 to 67 per cent. The instability follows the mixture over sites, not the program. The output does not show it: 46 of 410 fits ended with a negative likelihood-ratio statistic, impossible under convergence, and 123 of 410 report a K re-estimated under a domain restriction rather than the unconstrained maximum. Of 234 published studies using RELAX, none reported a seed. Seeding while holding the thread count at one reproduced sixty of sixty runs on twenty genes under two releases; the seed alone reproduced none of five, and no documentation states the second condition. We recommend that fits be repeated and their dispersion published.

evolutionary biology↗

Sequential accumulation of adaptive alleles forms an inversion supergene in deer mice

Supergenes are clusters of co-inherited loci that affect multiple or complex phenotypes. Despite the growing number of chromosomal inversions identified as supergenes in natural populations, their molecular basis and evolutionary history often remain obscure. Here, we identified two candidate genes, Slc45a2 and Npr3, within a 41-Mb inversion supergene in the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) that respectively drive darker coats and longer tails - two traits associated with forest adaptation. Mice homozygous for the inversion (inv/inv) exhibit elevated Slc45a2 expression in melanocytes relative to the congenic standard genotype (std/std), disrupting pheomelanin production. In parallel, downregulation of Npr3 in inv/inv mouse growth plates prolongs postnatal growth of caudal vertebrae, resulting in tail elongation. Population-level analyses further implicate that this supergene arose through the subsequent accumulation of the Npr3 allele within the inversion, rather than by capturing all beneficial mutations at its origin.

evolutionary biology↗

Toxin structure shapes palatability in a chemically defended butterfly

The toxicity of chemical defences is well studied, but the potential contribution of compound structure to predator deterrence remains largely unexplored. Whether predation acts more strongly on toxicity or unpalatability remains largely untested, partly because few systems allow toxin structure to vary independently of quantity. Heliconius sara larvae provide such a system: those reared on Passiflora auriculata sequester cyclopentenyl cyanogenic glucosides (CGs), while those reared on P. biflora biosynthesise comparable quantities of aliphatic CGs. Using two invertebrate predators, Camponotus floridanus ants and Hierodula membranacea mantids, we tested whether this structural difference affects palatability independent of toxicity. Mantids rejected larvae with cyclopentenyl CGs more often than larvae with aliphatic CGs, despite no detectable difference in total CG content. This pattern was mirrored in extract-based assays with ants, independently of cyanide release: extracts with cyclopentenyl CGs remained deterrent, while extracts with aliphatic CGs did not differ in deterrence from water. Live larvae, by contrast, elicited similar responses from ants regardless of CG structure. These results show that variation in toxin structure can strongly affect palatability, with some compounds conferring greater protection than others. This demonstrates the importance of chemical structural diversity in the evolution of chemical defences.

evolutionary biology↗