Systematic evaluation of 24 extraction and library preparation combinations for metagenomic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva

Abstract

Sequencing the respiratory tract transcriptome has the potential to provide insights into infectious pathogens and the hosts immune response. While DNA-based sequencing is more standard in clinical laboratories due to its stability, RNA assays offer unique advantages. RNA reflects dynamic physiological changes, and for RNA viruses, viral RNA particles directly represent copies of the viral genome, enabling greater diagnostic sensitivity. However, RNAs susceptibility to degradation remains a significant challenge, particularly in RNase-rich specimens like saliva. To address this, we conducted a systematic, combinatorial evaluation of 24 distinct mNGS workflows, crossing eight nucleic acid extraction methods with three RNA-Seq library preparation protocols. Remnant saliva samples (n = 6) were pooled and spiked with MS2 phage as a control. The SARS-CoV-2 virus was spiked into half of the samples, which were extracted using the eight different extraction methods (n = 3) and compared using RNA Integrity Number equivalent (RINe) scores and RNA concentration. The extracted RNA was then processed across the three library construction methods and subjected to short-read sequencing to assess all 24 combinations head-to-head. We compared methods based on viral read recovery and found that RINe and concentration did not correlate with viral detection. The Zymo Quick-RNA Magbead kit and the Tecan Revelo RNA-Seq High-Sensitivity RNA library kit were the extraction and library-preparation kits that yielded the most SARS-CoV-2 reads, respectively. Importantly, our combinatorial analysis revealed that any small variability attributable to different nucleic acid extraction methods was heavily overshadowed by differences in quality attributable to the RNA-Seq library preparation methods. These findings challenge the reliance on conventional RNA quality metrics for clinical metagenomics and underscore the need to redefine extraction quality standards for mNGS applications. IMPORTANCEmNGS is a powerful and unbiased approach towards pathogen detection that has mostly been applied to blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples. However mNGS has recently been applied to more areas including the respiratory pathogen detection space, with potential applications in both in-patient diagnostics and public health surveillance. Saliva samples are an ideal sample type for these use cases since they can be collected non-invasively. However, saliva is also a challenging sample type due to its high RNase activity and often yields low-quality nucleic acid. This study explores the feasibility of using saliva specimens in mNGS with contrived SARS-CoV-2 samples to optimize the combination of two factors: nucleic acid extraction and RNA-seq library preparation. Exploration in this area could enhance the sensitivity of saliva-based mNGS assays, with the goal of future expansion of this specimen type in clinical diagnostics and public health surveillance. Key PointsO_LIThe choice of RNA-Seq library preparation kit has a greater impact on pathogen detection than the nucleic acid extraction method. C_LIO_LIThe combination of Zymo Quick-RNA Magbead extraction kit and TECAN Revelo RNA-Seq High Sensitivity RNA library kit recovered the highest percentage of total SARS-CoV-2 reads. C_LIO_LIRNA quantity and RINe score do not correlate with viral read capture, indicating a need for an alternative metric to assess RNA quality for downstream mNGS clinical diagnostics. C_LI