bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

bioRxiv · 10.64898/2026.04.16.718907

Differential effects of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid on the regulation of liver endothelial permeability

Abstract

Background and AimsFenofibrate is widely prescribed for hyperlipidaemia and has been associated with rare but severe cases of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), yet its effects on liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) remain to be investigated. LSECs maintain a highly permeable specialized sinusoidal barrier characterized by transcellular pores (fenestrations), regulating the bidirectional transfer of circulating compounds to and from the hepatocytes. As drug-induced alterations in fenestration architecture could influence xenobiotic access to hepatocytes, these changes may modulate pathways associated with DILI. Understanding the effects of fenofibrate on LSEC ultrastructure may therefore provide insights into previously underexplored endothelial contributions to hepatic drug responses. MethodsBoth fenofibrate and its active metabolite, fenofibric acid, were evaluated for their effects on LSEC ultrastructure, mechanical properties, and functional markers. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and were used to quantify fenestration architecture. AFM was additionally used to measure cellular mechanical properties, which were interpreted in the context of fluorescence-based quantification of cytoskeletal organization. Gene expression, viability, and cytotoxicity were assessed using PCR-based and biochemical assays. ResultsFenofibrate reduced fenestration number and porosity at both tested concentration (10, and 25 {micro}M). It also decreased the apparent Youngs modulus of LSECs, accompanied by changes in tubulin and actin architecture, without detectable cytotoxicity. In contrast, treatment with fenofibric acid did not result in significant structural or mechanical effects on LSECs, even at higher concentrations. ConclusionsTogether, these data identify LSECs as a drug-responsive hepatic cell type for fenofibrate, suggesting that LSECs could represent an underrecognized contributor to the complex, multifactorial processes underlying DILI. This work provides a framework for evaluating endothelial contributions to fenofibrate-associated liver effects in more complex models. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=105 SRC="FIGDIR/small/718907v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (51K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f9ec6forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11174a1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1000e2borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a23b00_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG Fenofibrate reduces LSEC fenestrations and metabolic activity at higher concentrations, while its metabolite, fenofibric acid, does not affect LSEC, regardless of its concentration. C_FIG

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Luty, M. T., Borah, D., Szafranska, K., Giergiel, M., Trzos, K., McCourt, P., Lekka, M., Kotlinowski, J., Zapotoczny, B.. 2026-04-20. Differential effects of fenofibrate and fenofibric acid on the regulation of liver endothelial permeability. https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.04.16.718907

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related preprints

Contact-phagy remodels ER-mitochondria contact sites

Membrane contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and other organelles coordinate cellular organization, metabolism and stress responses, yet how these interfaces are selectively remodeled and removed remains poorly understood. Here we identify a selective autophagy pathway that targets defined ER-mitochondria contact-site (ERMCS) subdomains for turnover, a process we term Contact-phagy. The ER-resident chaperone SIGMAR1 forms a functional complex with the ER-phagy receptor CCPG1, and SIGMAR1-CCPG1 nanoclusters define ERMCS-associated sites of autophagy initiation. Contact-phagy is selectively engaged by metabolic and mitochondrial stress and promotes turnover of defined contact-site components without broadly affecting general ER-phagy, mitophagy or bulk autophagy. At these sites, SIGMAR1-CCPG1 function is coupled to mitochondrial fission: MFF promotes DRP1 recruitment to ERMCS, whereas loss of CCPG1 or SIGMAR1 causes abnormal persistence and clustering of DRP1 and MFF, accompanied by altered mitochondrial remodeling. Loss of CCPG1 further disrupts ER-mitochondria organization and mitochondrial function in pancreatic tissue, while pancreatic cancer cells depend on CCPG1 and SIGMAR1 for organelle integrity and bioenergetic capacity. Together, our findings establish Contact-phagy as a selective pathway for the turnover of defined organelle contact site subdomains and suggest a broader principle by which interorganelle interfaces are maintained.

cell biology↗

HUH-tag conjugation enables accessible, site-specific functionalization of DNA origami with signaling-competent proteins

DNA origami enables precise nanometer scale control over the number, spacing, and geometry of biomolecules, making it a powerful tool for dissecting spatially organized biological processes such as receptor signaling. However, functionalizing origami with proteins remains a bottleneck restricting the technology to specialized laboratories. Here we show that viral-derived HUH endonuclease tags, small (~10 kDa) domains that form a covalent phosphotyrosine bond with short unmodified ssDNA, provide a simple and cost-effective route to decorating DNA origami with functional proteins. Using interleukin-1{beta} (IL-1{beta}) as a model ligand, we generated recombinant IL-1{beta}-HUH, achieved efficient site-specific conjugation to unmodified ssDNA within minutes, and coupled the conjugates to a DNA origami pegboard with tunable stoichiometry. IL-1{beta}-functionalized origami triggered ligand-dependent signalling in living cells and allowed visualization of the recruitment of downstream signaling molecules, confirming that HUH-tag conjugation preserves functionality. Because this strategy requires only standard molecular biology equipment and unmodified DNA, it lowers a technical and financial barrier to DNA origami-based experimentation, opening the approach to a broader range of biological questions and laboratories outside the DNA nanotechnology field.

cell biology↗

Multivalent BBSome-IFT proximities support IFT-A-IFT-B coordination in vivo

Intraflagellar transport (IFT) depends on coordinated movement of IFT-A and IFT-B, yet how these assemblies remain coupled within dynamic ciliary trains is unclear. Here, we combine endogenous fluorescent knock-in tagging, quantitative in vivo FLIM-FRET, structural modeling, and targeted mutagenesis to define IFT organization in C. elegans and mammalian cells. FLIM-FRET mapping identifies proximity networks within IFT-B and places IFT144 near IFT172 and IFT88 in intact cilia. Loss of BBSome function is associated with weaker IFT-A-IFT-B proximity signals and divergent subcomplex transport dynamics, consistent with a contribution of the BBSome to IFT coordination in vivo. Split-GFP complementation places BBSome components near IFT-A and IFT-B, while structural modeling nominates complementary charged surfaces on the IFT46-IFT52 dimer and BBS7/BBS9. Charge-reversal mutations targeting these surfaces impair BBSome recruitment and functional rescue. Together, these findings support a model in which multivalent BBSome-IFT proximities contribute to IFT-A-IFT-B coordination during ciliary transport.

cell biology↗